US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Can be interesting no spécifications for final RFP end of year

Navy Issues New MQ-25A Stingray Draft RFP to Industry Ahead of Final RFP in the Fall
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
EMALS completely unable to be used or a bit/limited ? and with new arresting system always a problem ?
I cannot imagine EMALS being completely unusable. They shot numerous...and continue to do so...aircraft with all sorts of varying loads off of the ground based equipment, which is the same equipment. They tested pretty much the entire air wing.

They shot the test tugs off of the Ford while she was still in port and loaded those up with the same weights.

So, there is something at issue, no doubt, but it IMHO, is not the viability of the design or its absolute capability. They are tweeking it, and IMHO, there is now urgency building for them to correct it soon.

Time will tell.
 

PiSigma

"the engineer"
I cannot imagine EMALS being completely unusable. They shot numerous...and continue to do so...aircraft with all sorts of varying loads off of the ground based equipment, which is the same equipment. They tested pretty much the entire air wing.

They shot the test tugs off of the Ford while she was still in port and loaded those up with the same weights.

So, there is something at issue, no doubt, but it IMHO, is not the viability of the design or its absolute capability. They are tweeking it, and IMHO, there is now urgency building for them to correct it soon.

Time will tell.
I think EMALS will work. The general design and theory all checks out. Only need to do some fine tuning now.
 
I read with interest
CNO Richardson Envisions Network of Sensors, Payloads for Fleet Commanders to Access as a Service
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Chief of Naval Operations Adm. John Richardson is working to increase both the size and the capability of the fleet, with part of his plans relying on the notion to “network everything to everything” and allow sensors and weapons payloads to become a service available to fleet commanders.

Richardson, speaking Friday morning at the 2017 Naval Future Force Science and Technology Expo hosted by the Office of Naval Research and the American Society of Naval Engineers, said he looks at not just the number of ships in the fleet but the overall output of naval combat power. While a traditional shipbuilding-only approach gets the Navy to the right level of naval power by the late 2030s, Richardson said the Navy and industry need to work together to reach that same level of combat power much faster.

“Under the most traditional shipbuilding profiles – if we kept building ships at the profile, the rate at which we do right now – you can see that we get to 350 somewhere in about late 2030s, which is way late to need. We need to get sort of this equivalent of naval power, but we need to get it in the 2020s. that’s the decade of competition for us,” Richardson said.
“How do we get this level of performance out of the Navy but get up there quicker so that we’re reaching that amount of naval capability, naval power in the 2020 vice the late 2030s?”

More shipbuilding is the first of three ways to boost naval combat power, he said. Noting the many studies that have been conducted to determine the right size for the Navy going forward, CNO said, “we can argue about whether it’s 350, 351, 355, but it’s all really a pretty tight cluster around that mid-300s. And so we’ll let that discussion ensue, but as the person who’s consumed with building … the next navy, I’m saying let’s get building. All of the estimates, all of the assessments say it’s bigger than we are right now by a significant amount, and we’ve taken a look and coordinated and engaged the industrial base, and they’re ready for this challenge. If it’s about platforms, we can probably build 30 more ships than are in the program right now in the next seven years. If it’s about aircraft, hundreds more aircraft. The industrial base is ready to handle this challenge, we just have to make sure we can resource it.”

The second way to increase the output of combat power is to add more capability per ship: more advanced sensors, longer-range munitions, advanced technologies like directed energy weapons. And the third piece of the plan is to increase the ability of the ships and planes to operate together as a fleet, with Richardson saying that he leans towards the end of the spectrum that calls for netting together “everything to everything.”

Once that netting takes place, Richardson outlined his vision for operational commanders – from the numbered fleet commander to an individual pilot in a cockpit – being able to tap into a collection of all the sensors operating in the theater and make use of all the weapons on ships in the area, with both the incoming data and the outgoing munitions being a “service” for operators to use as needed.

“The fleet commander will have all of the sensors in his [area of responsibility] or her AOR at his or her disposal. If you’re properly networked too, all of the platforms, the blue platforms, are at that fleet commander’s disposal as well, and on those platforms are payloads, and so now you’ve got a system where, hey, I’ve got connectivity to all those payloads, it’s a service approach to payloads,” Richardson explained.
“And the tricky part is in the middle; how do I take that tremendous amount of data from all my sensors, my service of sensors, and connect it in the most effective and efficient way to my payloads, which are going to be the thing that I use to influence that environment? And so now you start to see the challenge for all of the science and technology [community].”

Using the OODA Loop reference – the fighter pilot process of observing, orienting, deciding and acting – he said the observe portion would be covered by the network of sensors and the act portion would be covered by the network of payloads. What will win an engagement, he said, is whatever technological developments industry can come up with to make sense of the massive quantities of data and create an actionable plan for leveraging those payloads.
but with all this networking ... as an armchair admiral, I think about jamming and other measures of Opfor to disrupt the communications
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
USS Milius deployment to Japan delayed amid ‘incredible’ workload in Asia-Pacific
The destroyer USS Milius’ forward deployment to Japan has been pushed back to 2018, despite a need for additional ships in the busy Asia-Pacific region.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Official release
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Today at 8:35 AM
I read with interest
CNO Richardson Envisions Network of Sensors, Payloads for Fleet Commanders to Access as a Service
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


but with all this networking ... as an armchair admiral, I think about jamming and other measures of Opfor to disrupt the communications
now related:
U.S. Navy boss: Network everything
The Navy’s top officer wants to expand the reach of each of his ships, and he’s looking towards networking to make it happen.

Chief of Naval Operations Adm. John Richardson said the Navy is going to look to increase its networking between platforms and systems as a way of gaining an advantage over the potential adversaries more quickly, given the long timeline associated with a massive naval buildup.

The current trajectory of his shipbuilding program gets the Navy to 355 ships sometime in the late 2030s, and that's just too long to wait, Richardson told an audience at the Office of Naval Research’s Science and Technology Expo.

“[That] is way late to me,” Richardson said Friday. “We need to get to that equivalent naval power but we need to get there in the 2020s, that’s the decade of competition. … As the person who's consumed with getting the Next Navy, I’m saying ‘let’s get building.’”

The industrial base could support an extra 30 ships over the next seven years to help get to the goal, he said, but even such an extravagant expenditure – which wouldn’t be likely under Budget Control Act spending caps – would still leave the fleet about 40 ships short of its 355-ship goal.

Richardson argues that increased competition with China and Russia and the proliferation of surveillance technology means that the Navy is going to have to create new advantages by both growing the fleet and increasing both the capabilities the interoperability of each of its ships.

“How do all these platforms work together?” Richardson asked. “In the extreme, I’d want to network everything to everything.”

Richardson said increasing both the number of ships and the capabilities on them provided a linear path forward to grow U.S. naval might, but increasing networking would bend the curve towards achieving the capabilities of a larger fleet faster.

Interoperability and networking were major considerations contained the request-for-information on the Navy’s next-generation frigate, known as FFG(X).

The RFI called for a frigate able to establish a complicated picture of a tactical environment with its on-board sensors, unmanned systems and embarked aircraft, and then beam that information back to the fleet through secure communications.

To achieve that, the Navy is planning to use systems that already in wide use in the fleet and that integrate seamlessly.

“We've got to make sure that these ships can fit into a future distributed maritime operations and be a contributor to that wider network of systems,” said Rear Adm. Ronald Boxall, the Navy’s surface warfare director, in a Defense News interview July 10. “And to do that you need some commonalities. There is a big move afoot to get more common systems and to think about these things on the front end.”
source is DefenseNews
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top