US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Site of GBU-43/B (MOAB), Nangarhar, Afghanistan

Footage provided by Afghan Local Police, from the site where the U.S. Forces - Afghanistan conducted a strike against an ISIS-K complex in Achin District, Nangarhar Province, Afghanistan on April 14th 2017.

The strike is part of the U.S. campaign to destroy ISIS-K in Afghanistan in 2017. The munition used, the GBU-43, is designed to destroy caves and tunnels, which ISIS-K had been using to move around the battle field and protect themselves from attacks from Afghan and U.S. Forces.

Blast rating is equal to 11 tons of TNT It's an Air burst effect though as opposed to a MOP or Massive ordnance penitrator. MOAB's effects against personal undercover though are not to be underestimated as it would blow the air out of caves and caverns suffocating any one inside said structures. less stable structure would also be effected by the Vacuum and shock wave effects.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
F-35s, F-15Cs Arrive in Bulgaria

Twelve F-15C Eagles landed in Bulgaria April 26 as part of a theater security package. The package, including 300 airmen from the Louisiana and Florida Air National Guard and the 12 aircraft from the 122nd Expeditionary Fighter Squadron, arrived at Graf Ignatievo Air Base in support of Operation Atlantic Resolve,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Two days later, USAF sent two F-35As to Bulgaria, along with 20 supporting airmen, for training purposes, according to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. The F-35s, from the Air Force’s 34th Fighter Squadron and the Air Force Reserve’s 466th Fighter Squadron, are based at Hill AFB, Utah. The F-35As deployed to RAF Lakenheath, England, on April 15, marking the type’s first overseas deployment, and previously made a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. “This deployment clearly demonstrates our nation's contribution to the security and collective defense here in Europe,” said Army Gen. Curtis Scaparrotti, EUCOM commander and NATO’s supreme allied commander for Europe, in the release. “It shows we are serious about territorial integrity and will defend our interests with the most advanced capabilities our nation has to offer.”

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Trilateral, Cross-Generation Integration at Langley

The Air Force’s fifth generation F-22s and F-35s flew alongside the best British and French fighters for the first time in a large-scale exercise here, but the aircraft is not the focus of the event.

For USAF commanders planning and flying regularly in Exercise Atlantic Trident 2017, the pilots and maintainers themselves are the important focus of the trilateral exercise.

“There’s been a lot of interest in the machines. Which airplane is better? What are their capabilities? How are you using them?” Col. Peter Fesler, commander of Langley’s 1st Fighter Wing, told Air Force Magazine on April 27 as the exercise wound down. “The thing I think is particularly interesting, the man in the machine matters tremendously. You can have the most capable aircraft in the world, but with a pilot who can’t perform, he will be beat. That’s why training matters, it’s why we have to do things like [this exercise]. You can’t just buy airpower.”

Atlantic Trident first began in December 2015, with Eurofighter Typhoons from the UK and French Dassault Rafales flying alongside F-22s at Langley. The inaugural effort focused more on deploying the aircraft and focusing on how they could bed down and operate at a new base. This time around, however, the aircraft built on that corporate knowledge and immediately jumped into training.

And this time, USAF F-35As from Eglin AFB, Fla., joined in.

Over the course of three weeks, USAF F-22s and F-35s flew alongside Eurofighters and Typhoons against USAF F-15Es from Mountain Home AFB, Idaho, and T-38s at Langley acting as “red air.” The first week focused on basic fighter maneuvers, the second on defensive counter air operations, and the third on offensive counter air.

F-22s and F-35s used stealth and advanced sensors to coordinate the speed and firepower of the Eurofighters and Rafales in combat against F-15Es and T-38s that had to develop different tactics to take on the advanced aircraft, said Lt. Col. Brad Bashore, commander of the 58th Fighter Squadron at Eglin.

“Sometimes sheer numbers are more important than the actual technological capabilities of that airframe,” Bashore said.

T-38s are “sneaky” and able to get closer, while F-15Es used their sensors to try to track the adversaries from distance.

“A big way to challenge fifth generation aircraft is to give you numbers, you put a lot of aircraft in the air,” Fesler said, adding that makes F-22 pilots plan better because of their limited number of weapons. “You can run Raptors out of munitions, and make pilots have to work.”

Eglin’s F-35s were called to participate in the exercise because the Air Force’s only operational F-35s, assigned to Hill AFB, Utah, were busy, on the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. The intense exercise helped the squadron’s instructor pilots better understand the capabilities and limitations of their aircraft and in turn improve their ability to teach new F-35 pilots.

Eglin’s F-35s are flying on the Block 2B software suite, which is more limited compared to the Block 3i suite on Hill’s F-35s. The jets were limited to Mach 1.6, 50 degree angle of attack, and 7Gs, however the F-35s were still able to use stealth and sensors to make a difference, Bashore said.

But the jets themselves don’t tell the whole story of the three-week exercise.

“All these aircraft have tremendous capabilities, but if we don’t plan them and integrate them and understand each other’s capabilities and limitations, and use them to their full potential, then we could lose in any combat scenario,” Bashore said. “It’s more about the human element.”

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
The Army's 82nd Airborne is preparing to use a Marine vehicle for airdrops
By:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
April 28, 2017
For what’s likely the first time in history, the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division is having Marine armored vehicles modified for airdrops as the paratroopers consider adding the vehicle to their Global Response Force toolkit.

Last year and earlier this year, soldiers with the 82nd Airborne's 5th Squadron, 73rd Cavalry Regiment conducted simulator training with Marines at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, hands-on driver training at Camp Pendleton, California, and maintenance training at Fort Lee, Virginia, said Capt. John Moore, a spokesman for the division’s 3rd Brigade Combat Team.

The paratroopers like the Light Armored Vehicle 25 for its lighter weight — compared to the Army's Strykers — and superior firepower as compared to what they have on hand at the division, Moore said. He declined to comment on the number of vehicles or airdrop testing but did say that the airdrop ability would be a “significant capability increase.”

The 82nd is part of the Global Response Force, with units ready to deploy to contingencies around the world on short notice. Under the mission, a battalion-sized element must be able to deploy within 18 hours, with others following soon after.

The LAV is an eight-wheeled vehicle that weighs 31,000 to 38,000 pounds, depending on the variant. The models being tested by the 82nd Airborne have a 25 mm gun. The vehicles also use a three-person crew and can carry an additional six troops, according to General Dynamics Land Systems data.

The Marines have sent four LAVs for testing and training by soldiers at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, said John Myers, the deputy program manager for the Marines' LAVs. Three other LAVs are at General Dynamics, the private company that produces the LAV and Stryker, where they are being modified for air drops, he said.

General Dynamics Land Systems has already delivered one of the modified LAVs and expects to have the other LAVs ready in the next few months for a scheduled air drop, likely at Fort Bragg, in November, said Michael Peck, director of the company’s Enterprise Business Development.

This is the first time Peck knew of, he said, that any military client requested the LAV be used in an airdrop. But the company did its own successful airdrop tests of both the LAV and the Stryker in the early 2000s.



No clients had made requests for the modifications until now, Peck said. Most of their foreign nation clients use the LAV variants for homeland defense and don’t have a need for airborne operations.

Peck said that the modifications require chassis work that involves parachute rigging attachments. The work takes about one month per vehicle.

He said that four LAVs or three Strykers, depending on the model, could fit into a C-17.

Interestingly, the LAV was originally going to be provided for both the Army and Marines when the Department of Defense began exploring the vehicle as an option. However, the Army opted out of the LAVs at the time.

The Army has expressed interest in taking up to 60 LAV-25s, contingent upon test results, said Barb Hamby, spokeswoman for Marine Corps Systems Command in Quantico, Virginia.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The LAV 25 is a 14 (short)Ton 8x8 wheeled vehicle currently used by the USMC based off the MOWAG Piranha I It's light armor only offers protection from small arms up to 12.7mm, In it's stock configuration Although due to operations in Iraq and Afghanistan they have been increasingly up armored but at the cost of increased weight which in the LAV25A1 and A2 configurations caused the Marines to withdraw it's amphibious swim certifications.
The Turret on the LAV25 is more or less the same as the Bradley IFV. and like the Bradley it has a crew of 3 1 driver, 1 gunner 1 commander + 6 infantry scouts.
Interestingly one of the Ideas kicked around from time to time was to use the LAV25 and Ch53E aircraft external aircraft to create a air mobile Marine Corps, It never went anywhere though as the Ch53 lacks the legs and LAV25 lacks the protection to take on a real mechanized force.
for the Army this would not work either as the LAV25 is too heavy for sling loading on the CH47 Chinook.
LAV25 for the marines is part of a Family of vehicles including, Recovery, Mortar, AGTM, Command and electronic warfare vehicles. It would be interesting to see if the 82nd picks these up as well.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Lav 25 has more firepower than Stryker?
Yes and no but more important is Context.
superior firepower as compared to what they have on hand at the division
Compared to what the 82nd Airborne had in its motor pool which was reduced post cold war.

until 1996 the 82nd operated M551A1 Sheridan light tanks. Those were phased out. The 82nd has had Abrams and Bradleys even a few Strykers and MRAPS tacked on from time to time but they don't seem to stick as the 82nd is an Infantry division and none of these vehicles can really remain organic to a unit that emphasizes Para drops.

The Vehicles that have stuck are light utility, HMMWV's, M113 ( phase out ) the very popular Razr. the Stryker is too heavy for Airdrops, same for Bradley and don't even ask about an Abrams.
So compared to Hummvees yeah this is a major fire power advantage.

Also compared to the Stock ICV Stryker which is an APC not the new Gunslinger model this is again step up as the stock Stryker is armed with a 12.7mm or 40mm Machine gun. Where the Upgunned Gunslinger with a 30mm Autocannon would outgun an LAV 25.
Not the Army had launched a couple programs for the 82nd Airborne as a Special needs unit.
The Mobile protected firepower, Light Reconnaissance vehicle and the now Ground Mobility Vehicle formerly the Ultra Light Combat Vehicle.
These were supposed to fill the mission gaps.
The MPF is still conceptual. with offerings from BAE and GDLS but no ready to go systems.
the GMV is in bidding with contract aimed for the end of this year.
That just leaves the LRV. the funny thing is the LRV was supposed to have been canceled in favor of JLTV's with 30mm Bushmaster cannons.
It seems like the 82nd Airborne is kinda pulling a little bit of a underhanded procurement here, Either they don't want the JLTV with a cannon or They are pushing to add there own IFV.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Yes and no but more important is Context.

Compared to what the 82nd Airborne had in its motor pool which was reduced post cold war.

until 1996 the 82nd operated M551A1 Sheridan light tanks. Those were phased out. The 82nd has had Abrams and Bradleys even a few Strykers and MRAPS tacked on from time to time but they don't seem to stick as the 82nd is an Infantry division and none of these vehicles can really remain organic to a unit that emphasizes Para drops.

3-73rd Armor Battalion (Airborne): 58 M-551, 7 HMMWV .50 Cal, 6 M-106, 4 M-577, 14 M113, 6 Dragon
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


During Desert Storm 43 Sheridan and a Brigade plus 18th FA Br. rattached to Daguet Division in fact 6th Light Armored reinforced :)
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
58 M-551, 7 HMMWV .50 Cal, 6 M-106, 4 M-577, 14 M113, 6 Dragon
M551 ( retired 1996) M8 intended replacement never procured, Stryker MGS was procured for Stryker Brigade combat teams but in limited numbers and never Airdrop rated. MPF is hoped to fulfill mission.
M106 ( Retired 1990's replaced with M1064 based on M113 Vehicle to retire 2018) Intended replacement is Bradley Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle Mortar Carrier Vehicle and M1129 Stryker Mortar neither is Airdrop capable.
M577 ( upgraded to M1068 based on M113 vehicle to retire 2018) replacements are Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle Mission Command and Stryker M1130 Commander Vehicle either Drop capable.
M113 ( to retire 2018) Replacments AMPV and Stryker.
M47 Dragon (Retired replaced by Javelin)
HMMWV active projected to remain so until 2050 but Reduced Roles and reset needed with JLTV and other vehicle coming in to selectively replace.
 
Last edited:
Saturday at 12:25 PM
Yesterday at 8:26 PM
and more informative
("... Trump abandoned a demand for money for a border wall with Mexico ...")
article is
Congress OKs Bill Averting Saturday Gov't Shutdown
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

just the link the link here though
now I noticed (Updated 12:13 AM ET, Mon May 1, 2017)
Congressional negotiators reach deal on government funding through September
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"... The plan would add billions for the Pentagon and border security but would not provide any money for President Donald Trump's promised border wall with Mexico,
Votes in both chambers are expected by the end of the week. ..."
 
Top