US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Apr 20, 2017
now I read Long-Range Discrimination Radar passes preliminary design review

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
related:
Lockheed Advances North Korea-facing Radar
Apr 25, 2017
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

As the Trump administration warns North Korea against developing a nuclear-tipped ballistic missile capable of striking mainland America, the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
-developed radar that would help thwart such an attack is moving into the detailed design phase.

The first-of-its-kind solid-state, dual-polarization super high-frequency radar was ordered by the Missile Defense Agency in 2015 to direct anti-ballistic missile interceptors against their targets on the edge of space, specifically those from North Korea.

Lockheed says after 18 months of system-level design and development, all of the critical components and manufacturing processes needed for the Long-Range Discrimination Radar (LRDR) have been ripened to Technology Readiness Level-6, meaning they have been modeled or demonstrated end-to-end in a relevant environment.

Passing the preliminary design milestone review keeps LRDR on track for deployment in 2020, by which point Pyongyang is expected to have a fully developed ICBM capability, as well as nuclear warheads small and robust enough to arm it.

The massive two-sided radar complex is being set up at Clear Air Force Station in Alaska, facing west toward North Korea, Russia and China. Because the U.S. does not have enough interceptors to block a significant nuclear strike by Moscow or Beijing, MDA’s primary focus is on the more limited North Korean threat.

LRDR will be hooked into the U.S.’s global ballistic missile defense network, mainly feeding targeting data to the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
-built
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
element, armed with 44 silo-based interceptors based in Alaska and California.

Chandra Marshall, Lockheed’s LRDR program director, said during a media briefing on April 20 that the two-day preliminary design review wrapped up in March and involved officials from MDA and the Office of the Secretary of Defense. The next milestone is a critical design review in September followed by the final design review two months later.

These reviews ensure that Lockheed and its radar system can successfully transition into full-scale production and fielding without serious technical difficulty.

Marshall says full-rate production is still scheduled for spring 2018.

To support development and testing, Lockheed has constructed a subscale prototype and solid-state radar integration facility in Moorestown, New Jersey. About 90% of the testing requirements can be accomplished in Moorestown and major components will begin moving to Alaska in 2019 for operational deployment.

“The key is this radar’s ability to do long-distance detection and characterization of ballistic missiles,” Marshall says. “This radar will do that better than any radar fielded today. Dual-polarity allows us to discriminate better and provide better track data on what we’re seeing.”

The high-frequency S-Band antenna uses solid-state gallium nitride (GaN) components to achieve higher power levels for greater range and discrimination of potential targets. Being able to more reliably discern between missiles and warheads and other objects such as chaff and decoy countermeasures means that the interceptors are more likely to hit the right object. That could reduce the number of interceptors that need to be fired at each target for a high probability of kill.

Lockheed won the LRDR program in 2015, receiving a $784 million contract for development, fabrication and testing. The project remains within that budget, Lockheed confirms.

The radar incorporates technologies from Lockheed’s ship-based
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Combat System, Aegis Ashore and Space Fence. Marshall says LRDR can be scaled to suit a variety of roles on land or at sea.

If the Trump administration decides to expand the U.S. missile defense complex, Lockheed says it is ready to build however many LRDR sites are needed. “We can offer this for any ground or maritime-based solution the customer is seeking,” she says.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Army Aviation Summit: Night Stalkers Show Their Wares

The US Army’s 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment (SOAR) displayed its mission critical equipment for reconnaissance, assault and attack operations. The 160th SOAR has three primary helicopters in its more than 180 aircraft fleet. They include Boeing’s MH/AH-6M (Little Bird) and MH-47G (CHINOOK) and the Sikorsky MH-60M (BLACKHAWK).

The Fort Campbell, Kentucky-based unit showed the versatility of its MH-60M in both Assault and Direct Action Penetrator (DAP) configurations. In the Assault configuration, the SOAR can conduct a precision air assault, a troop infiltration or extraction of special operations forces worldwide - at night while armed with two Dillon Aero 7.62mm M134 Miniguns. In the DAP configuration, the BLACKHAWK is more heavily armed to conduct clandestine attacks or close-air-support against a variety of targets. DAP armaments include two Miniguns, Lockheed Martin M299 HELLFIRE, Arnold Defense 2.75-inch rocket launchers (M260/M261), and the Orbital ATK M230 Bushmaster Chain Gun.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


MH-60M .jpg
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
We are the 28 :)

Set to expire at midnight on April 28, CR extended for a week a deal remains possible but not easy :rolleyes:

Republican lawmakers offer weeklong bill to avoid government shutdown

U.S. House Republicans introduced a stopgap spending resolution late Wednesday to avert a partial government shutdown through May 5 as leadership continues negotiations on a larger budget deal.
...
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
Well guys, we're in serious trouble, because the PRC is spending about $800 BILLION on its 2017 defense, against only around $600 billion US spends. The number is from Senator David Purdue in a televised meeting with Admiral Harry Harris (1:10 mark of the Youtube video below). The Senator said $800b was based on PPP equivalent of approximately $240 billion nominal dollar by Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

My problem with Purdue's $800 billion PPP claim is it doesn't make much sense, even from a back-of-the-napkin calculation. To wit:
$800b divided by $240b= 3.33 multiples
IMF's estimate of PRC 2017 GDP is about $11.79 trillion nominal dollars
IMF's estimate of PRC 2017 GDP is about $23.19 trillion PPP dollars
$23.19t divided by $11.79t= 1.97 multiples
Therefore, SIPRI's 2017 PRC defense spending of $250bx1.97= $492.5b

Just a straight line calculation show PRC spends less than $500b in defense, which doesn't even match the $600b we currently spend, never mind Purdue's $800b number. Why is that important for our fellow Americans? Because excessive scaremongering is little different from the boy that cried wolf, except in China's case, it's a good bet someday the beast would actually appear.

The moral of the story is tell it like it is and not like one wishes.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Okay so what he is doing is saying that because of the Way the PRC works With everything horizontally integrated and a lower standard of pay/work labor.
The Chinese in his mind have a buying power advantage.
He is not saying that 800 Billion is there actual budget, but that the PLA is so integrated into the the PRC Military industrial complex that they don't bid or go through the process in the same way.
If you look at the pay and benefits for someone working for a defence contractor in the US, It's a really good job lots of pay and benefits a very high cost of doing business to maintain the firm.
Where in the PRC those are different, and Chinese owned or rather Government owned Firms don't operate in the same manner, so they can build a similar product for less in theory, even if said product is not to the same quality or capability. So take a modern product like the M1A2 SEP 2 about $8.92 million now compare that to the VT4 unit price of about 4 million ( using it as the Type 99 and VT4 are very very close, I have no current price estimate for the Type 99 current version but then I am not using the SEP3 or Tusk either ) So same generation of Armor, Similar capabilities half the price.
 
Yesterday at 5:28 PM
Apr 6, 2017
now

"House Appropriations Committee Chairman Rodney Frelinghuysen, R-N.J., said in a statement announcing his weeklong continuing resolution bill that he expects "a final funding package will be completed soon.” Congress has until the end of Friday night to pass the bill and avert a shutdown.

"This continuing resolution will continue to keep the government open and operating as normal for the next several days, in order to finalize legislation to fund the federal government for the rest of the fiscal year," he said."

so let's wait and see ... Republican lawmakers offer weeklong bill to avoid government shutdown
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
while now
Congress passes bill to avert government shutdown through May 5
The U.S. Congress approved a continuing resolution that would extend government funding for another week to buy time to wrap negotiations on the overdue fiscal 2017 spending package.

President Donald Trump was expected to sign the the weeklong stopgap spending bill, which expires May 5. Negotiations are ongoing for the 11 remaining fiscal 2017 spending bills.

Democrats are seeking domestic spending increases in exchange for a White House-requested defense increase and to exclude what they term “poison pill” policy riders. The defense increase in play is reported to be $15 billion, half of the $30 billion Trump requested in March.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., declined to confirm the amount and suggested the matter is not entirely settled. “That's part of the discussions,” Schumer said. “Democrats are not averse to an increase in defense, but we want an increase in other things, too.”

The Senate approved the CR by unanimous consent an hour after the House had passed it in a largely bipartisan vote, 382-30. Democrats and Republicans roughly split the "no" votes.

“I am optimistic that a full-year appropriations package will be completed soon,” House Appropriations Committee Chairman Rodney Frelinghuysen, R-N.J., said following the House vote. “Congress must fulfill our constitutional duty and provide responsible funding for the federal government for the rest of this fiscal year.”

Democrats had threatened to oppose the continuing resolution without a deal in hand, but House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer signaled support even though “there are still significant items that are not resolved.” The Democrat from Maryland said he expected House Republicans to have a spending bill filed Monday night for passage on Thursday.

Fiscal 2017 began at the end of September, but CRs have become the norm in Congress. Lawmakers would almost certainly have agreed to a full-year spending deal in the fall, but at Trump’s request, GOP leadership punted to give the new administration a chance to add its stamp.

Along with Democrats, some Republicans — particularly pro-defense lawmakers — have groused the stopgap bill was needed. Because CRs generally bar new-start acquisition programs and continue funding at the previous year’s level, they can be disruptive to the military.

“The continuing resolution is never anyone’s first choice for funding the government. However, this is our best path forward,” Frelinghuysen said.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
@TerraN_EmpirE : I think Admiral Harris used similar criteria to what you outlined, and said PRC defense spending has reached "parity" with US defense spending. That's within striking range of SIPRI's PPP estimate of PRC numbers: $500 billion vs. $600 billion from Harris. Senator Purdue's $800 billion, on the other hand, is right out of left field, and no amount of (rational) deck chair rearranging could account for it.
 
Top