US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Yesterday at 7:46 PM
Today at 8:06 AM

while
DOD demurs on production go-ahead for CH-53K

source is FlightGlobal
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
but
Marines’ CH-53K Heavy Lift Helicopter Approved To Enter Production
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Pentagon today formally approved the Marine Corps’ CH-53K Super Stallion heavy lift helicopter program to move into production.

The aircraft, which replaces the CH-53E, provides about three times the external lift capability, greater ranges and better reliability for the Marine Corps, in support of the service hauling heavier equipment at greater standoff distances from ship to shore.

“On April 4, 2017, the Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L)) approved the Navy’s request for the CH-53K King Stallion program to enter into the Production and Deployment phase,” Pentagon spokesman Cmdr. Patrick Evans said in a statement.
“From the review, the Senior Official Performing the Duties of the USD(AT&L) determined that the program is ready for the Production and Deployment phase.”

“The team has worked really hard to ensure we could get here, to Milestone C, and to begin low-rate initial production,” Deputy Commandant for Aviation Lt. Gen. Jon Davis said in a statement.
“I’m very proud of all of them, and I’m looking forward to getting the most powerful heavy-lift helicopter ever designed into the hands of our Marines.”

Ahead of that Milestone C acquisition decision, program manager Col. Henry Vanderborght told reporters at the Navy League’s annual Sea-Air-Space exposition that “there are so many improvements that have been made to this aircraft” to boost lift capability, safety, reliability and maintainability.

“This capability right here is really going to be an incredible step increase for the warfighter and the [Marine Air-Ground Task Force],” he said.
“Basically 3X the lift capability in the same ambient conditions as the legacy aircraft, meaning the K will be able to lift three times more than the 53E in that 110 nautical mile environment, 103 degrees Fahrenheit at sea level with [a landing zone] of 3,000 (feet) … above sea level, with 91.5 Fahrenheit at that LZ. That’s basically our key performance parameter.”

Beyond the sheer numbers, Vanderborght said automation, both in the control modes and in tracking and predicting maintenance needs, will make the aircraft safer and easier to operate.

“Basically the 53K will be able to fly to an LZ pretty much hands off and pick up a hover in total brownout conditions – and that’s one of the areas where we’ve lost a lot of aircraft, a lot of Es,” he said.
“So from a safety standpoint, survivability, it’s just incredibly more capable than what we have today, and the Marines pretty much can’t wait to get it.”

He said the new aircraft would cost about the same as its predecessor in operations and sustainment costs, but for that money the Marines would get a much higher sortie generation rate.

A Fleet Common Operating Environment (FCOE), which has been running for years on the CH-53E, collects aircraft maintenance data and ultimately may help the Marines get to a condition-based maintenance environment.

“There’s so much data coming off this airplane, that the idea will be the airplane will tell you when you need to start removing things, when the operator needs to start removing things, and that will save a lot of money and time,” Vanderborght said.

For example, he said, the main rotor gear box on the legacy CH-53E used to be overhauled every 2,000 hours, but a study with FCOE data proved maintainers could overhaul it at 2,400 hours instead.

“What that equates to is five less main rotor gear boxes that we’ve got to pull every year at a savings of about $4.7 million,” the program manager said.
“That’s just one example, there are many others.”

Michael Torok, Sikorsky’s vice president of CH-53K programs, said at the same media briefing that “the amount and magnitude of sensors that are on the aircraft,” plus the computing power in FCOE, “really allows the maintainers, when the aircraft comes back in, to debrief, you stick the [cards] into the laptops and all of that diagnostics on the ground station basically will really focus in on any maintenance that is required. So false removals go down, false alarms go down. Really focuses and reduces mean time to repair. So that automation, that technology is really going to play a significant role” in keeping operations and sustainment costs down.

Torok said the first four CH-53Ks have been “mapping out the rest of the edge of the envelop” for how the aircraft can operate beyond its basic requirement of 27,000 pounds for 110 nautical miles. Additionally, aircraft 5 and 6 are already under contract, and Sikorsky is buying long-lead materials for the first Low-Rate Initial Production contract of two aircraft. Sikorsky’s production line, which will consolidate to their Connecticut facility, will eventually build 24 aircraft a year and reach full-rate production in 2020.

Overall program costs for the CH-53K come to about $87 million per helicopter and $133 million per unit when research and development, spares, and other program costs are included. The first four helos that had been used for testing will deliver to the Marine Corps next year, with LRIP aircraft delivering starting in 2021, the Marine Corps said in its statement.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
inside
"Ohio-class subs could be unfit underwater in a decade ..."
oh really?
The First generation of Ohio entered service in 1981, the first four off the line were converted to SSGN's in 2004. now if we zoom out the LA class is already being phased out and plenty of those hulls were just as old. not only that but if we look at the Russian fleet the Typhoon class SSBN entered service at the same time and all but 1 have been decommissioned and or Scrapped. Those first Ohio boats were already slated for retirement in the next decade. existing plans have the Columbia entering service after the Ohio's start heading to the ghost fleet if not scrap in about 2031. so it's not that much of an over statement.
speaking of which. columbia_class.jpg
Columbia-class on track, but Navy keeps wary eye on budget maneuvers
By:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
April 4, 2017 (Photo Credit: General Dynamics Electric Boat)
NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. – The Columbia-class nuclear submarine program is on track to meet its expected deadline, but the Navy is keeping a nervous eye on budget negotiations on the Hill.

The program, which will replace the Ohio-class nuclear submarine fleet, is progressing towards the start of construction in 2021 – and patrols by 2031 – Vice Adm. David Johnson, principal military deputy assistant secretary of the Navy for research, development and acquisition, said at the annual Navy League Sea-Air-Space conference Tuesday.

But, he acknowledged, the current budget uncertainty could throw a wrench into that situation, particularly with the possibility that the government could spend the rest of fiscal year 2017 operating under a continuing resolution, or CR.

Under a CR, budget levels are frozen at the previous year’s figures, unless a program is given a special anomaly exception from Congress. In a past CR, the Columbia-class was given that pass by Congress, but even so, Johnson is taking nothing for granted this year – or next year.

“The issue for Columbia is, let's say we got all the [funding] for the year,” Johnson told reporters after his speech. “Then we have the same thing in 1 October, 2017. … It’s not a sustainable, long-term strategy. That’s the issue.

“We can execute, but we need a budget,” he added.

During the panel, Johnson reiterated concerns put forth by the department that without a major increase in funding, the Columbia program will eat into the current shipbuilding plan for the Navy – let alone plans to get to 355 ships, something more in line with what President Donald Trump has indicated he supports.

However, Johnson said the budget questions are not having an impact on how the Navy is negotiating contracts with General Dynamics Electric Boat, the primary contractor for Columbia, nor with Huntington Ingalls Industries Newport News Shipbuilding, which will build roughly a third of each Columbia.

“That work is progressing on plan. The contract negotiations are very close to being done, and they are not at all impacted by a CR or any of that,” Johnson told reporters. “It’s just straight work in the business of designing and building submarines.”

The U.S. plans to design and build 12 Columbia-class submarines for a total acquisition cost of $100 billion in 2017 dollars – or $128 billion, as measured in total year dollars through the program, which stretches into the mid-2030s.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Any way those videos from Sea Air and Space had some much more interesting stuff. Ingals still offering there San Antonio II for Future Surface Combatant. Boeing offering a new Unmanned diesel sub, a possible replacement seal delivery vehicle, air dropped MK54 options.

In push to normalize space domain, Air Force adds new three-star position
By:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
April 4, 2017
COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. — Change is coming to the Air Force’s space enterprise, starting with the creation of a new three-star position on the Air Staff that will help enhance the visibility of space issues in the Pentagon.

Air Force Space Command head Gen. John Raymond announced the new deputy chief of staff for space position during a speech at the Space Symposium.

“Just like we have a deputy chief of staff for operations, and a deputy chief of staff for intel, we’re going to have a deputy chief of staff for space,” he said Tuesday. “He or she will work at the Pentagon, it will be a three-star general, and they’ll come to work every day focused on this, making sure that we can organize, train and equip our forces to meet the challenges in this domain.”

The service has yet to fill the newly minted “A11” position, but the Air Force hopes whoever takes the role will serve as its “space advocate,” making sure the needs of operators are heard and helping to facilitate cultural change.

In a statement, Air Force Chief of Staff David Goldfein said the A11 “will increase decision making speed and help ensure freedom from attack and freedom to maneuver.”

The A11 position is part of the Air Force’s larger push to make the domain of space more normalized and easily understandable, with less bureaucracy, stovepipes and technical jargon. Although space is tied into every aspect of Air Force operations, from communications between fighter jets to flying unmanned aircraft, the service has sometimes struggled to articulate the importance of space capabilities and maintaining their technical edge. It hopes to start remedying that, releasing a new “space warfighting construct” today that calls for greater integration of space in areas such as training or requirements development.

In a news release, the service highlighted ways it plans to reform space acquisition, including steamlining the approval process for space programs and plans, and embedding professionals on the teams that create requirements for non-space programs. It also plans to “expand the use of the Operationally Responsive Space (ORS) organization to rapidly field systems, as well as procure existing commercial capabilities.”

The addition of the A11 position wasn’t the only change to the Defense Department’s space enterprise announced on Tuesday. The unwieldly-named Joint Interagency Combined Space Operations Center (JICSpOC) will now be known as the National Space Defense Center, Strategic Command head Gen. John Hyten said earlier in the day.

The change will help “eliminate confusion” and “better describe its actual purpose,” which is to unify the Defense Department’s efforts in space with that of the intelligence community and National Reconnaissance Office, Hyten stated in testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee. The center started its initial operations phase in November 2016.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:
inside
...
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



...
... the Navy is keeping a nervous eye on budget negotiations on the Hill.
I read somewhere today there're four "working" days left to avoid the CR ...

EDIT
now found this "somewhere" (it's full of Politics, so just the link)
HASC Seapower Leaders ‘Optimistic’ Congress Will Avoid a Full-Year CR For Military Services
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Navy has Found Fix for USS Zumwalt Engineering Problem

The Navy has found and tested a fix for an engineering problem that sidelined USS Zumwalt (DDG-1000) several times during the ship’s voyage to its homeport, Zumwalt-class program manager Capt. Kevin Smith said on Tuesday.

During its transit, Zumwalt’s lube oil chillers failed resulting in water leaking into the propulsion system several times – once resulting in loss of power moving through the Panama Canal. The seawater lube oil coolers prevent the lubrication of rotating shafts from breaking down due to heat and friction.

“Like other ship platforms today, when you mix seawater with steel… bad things can happen,” Smith said.

“What we did was shift to fresh water for the coolers. Before we got to San Diego we realized that’s one way of fixing this problem. It’s not a large demand on cooling so we decided to go down that path.”

While the complex electrical propulsion system on the ship was extensively tested pier-side at the General Dynamics Bath Iron Works shipyard, the lube oil chiller problem was only discovered after the ship had spent time underway, Smith said.

The Navy tested the fresh water fix to the chillers during two underway periods the ship has had since it arrived in San Diego in December.

Smith said the periods proved the repair worked and the change has been implemented on the under construction Michael Monsoor (DDG-1001) and Lyndon B. Johnson (DDG-1002).

“As far as ships two and three – and Bath can attest – we’re making sure to make the temporary changes now to make sure we don’t have any issues with the class,” he said.

In the longer term, Naval Sea Systems Command is evaluating a longer-term solution to ships beyond the three-ship class.

“We are looking at next generation, what do we want to do as far as new cooler design,” Smith said.
“Not just for this ship but for other ships in the Navy. There are other things we’re looking at [creating] a better MILSPEC standard cooler that we can put in that will last the lifecycle of the ship – 30 plus years.”

Zumwalt is in San Diego undergoing a maintenance period in which the ship’s combat systems will be activated and tested ahead of a planned first deployment in 2021.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top