US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Last edited:

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
18 ways the Army wants to make you deadlier
Kyle Jahner, Army Times5:42 p.m. EDT June 1, 2016
If you look at a soldier from World War II or Korea or Vietnam, you will see similarities to today’s infantryman: helmet, rifle, bullets, boots: the basics.

Naturally, there’s a lot of differences, too. In five years, there will be more, and 15 years, more still, as the Army works to keep the technological edge of the dismounted combat troop.

As wide-ranging as they are, both near-term and long-term advances sought by the Army reveal some emerging themes.



The Army wants soldiers better protected, but also lighter and more agile.
The Army wants better situational awareness, including improved vision at night.
The Army wants to empower smaller units with more portable versions of tech now available to higher echelons.
But what about your guns? Improvements may be more incremental. Physics have limits and so do budgets. But the Army is upgrading carbines with a more reliable barrel, it has picked out a new sniper rifle and it is working to do the same for a new handgun.

These improvements come from a variety of sources, including the Army’s Research, Engineering and Development Command (working closely with industry and academia), the Maneuver Center of Excellence (infused with ideas direct from the battlefield) and of course Program Executive Office Soldier, which develops prototypes and procures field equipment as technological advances become available.

The result: an Army constantly developing and prioritizing new gear to make the dismounted soldier safer and more lethal. Here are just some of the programs underway that could mean new gear to the front lines — sooner than you think.

1. M4A1

The upgrade offers a heavier barrel; some soldiers reported M4s overheating, becoming warped and then jamming during extended use, particularly in Afghanistan. It also adds ambidextrous safety controls and converts the weapon’s three-round burst option into fully-automatic.

Will this actually happen? Yes. Here's what won't happen, however: The Army also ran a market survey in March 2015 for additional M4 upgrades dubbed M4A1+. Ideas included: an extended Picatinny rail, a floating barrel for enhanced accuracy, and an optional sniper-style single-stage trigger for marksmen, flash suppressor, removable sights, and more neutral colors, among a variety of other enhancements. But the “plus” died with the survey; there’s currently no formal requirements, program of record nor funding.


ARMY TIMES

Army aims for positive improvements with M4A1+


2. XM17 (Modular Handgun System)

What does it do? This will replace the Beretta M9 as the Army’s sidearm.

How heavy is it? The 351-page requirement document does not specify a weight, but presumably similar weight to a standard striker-style handgun, between 1.5 and 2 pounds.

When might you have one? The Army plans for full-rate production in 2018.

Why should you care? The Army has used an iteration of the M9 as its standard sidearm since 1985. The new pistol will feature better modularity, ergonomics, and accuracy. The requirements require a striker-style firing mechanism. The modular aspect will include ability to adjust grip size, and to add accessories via a Picatinny rail. The competition is open caliber, so the 9mm NATO standard round could be upsized to a .40 or a .45 caliber weapon. In addition the Army, which has stuck with full metal jackets for decades, has not ruled out hollow-point or fragmenting ammunition.

Will this actually happen? Probably. But not definitely. Companies (the Army won’t say how many) have submitted their candidates for the contract for the Army to evaluate, so the wheels are in motion. But that was also true of the Individual Carbine program canceled in 2013, and soldiers still carry M4s with no replacement plans in sight. Complaints of cost/waste have already emerged: Army Chief Gen. Mark Milleyquipped he could find a new pistol with $17 million and a trip to Cabela’s, and Sen. John McCain slammed the MHS program in his series of “Americas Most Wasted” reports. If such complaints intensify in a tight budget environment, the Army could pull the plug.

3. Compact Semi-Automatic Sniper System

What does it do? It shoots people from far away. The Army has selected a variant of Heckler & Koch’s G28 for the role, replacing the M110.

How heavy is it? Roughly 12.7 pounds, or 3 pounds lighter than the M110.

4. XM25

What does it do? The XM25 grenade launcher and its five-25mm grenade magazine offers a programmable round and fire control.

How heavy is it? Roughly 14 pounds, unloaded.

When might you have one? Perhaps as soon as 2017. Assuming funding (which the Army has requested for the coming fiscal year) and testing stay on track.


Why should you care? This stand-alone weapon offers the ability to set a laser on a target, gauge distance automatically, program a grenade to go that distance (with manual adjustments) and fire the grenade. Fire control takes into account various ballistics and environmental factors to aid accuracy, as do magnified optical and thermal sights. In short, aim at a wall, push a button to program the point you want the grenade to explode. From there, aim fire. The 25mm grenade is designed to explode right where you told it to, from up to 500-600 meters away.

Will this actually happen? More likely than not. It’s been in the pipeline for years; it was pulled from the battlefield in Afghanistan in 2013 due to injury-causing malfunctions. The company and Army hope the kinks are worked out: it’s a program of record recently named in the 2017 budget as a priority that meets a critical capability gap, so this isn’t far out.
reposting as parts got lost.
I think I read enough of Land Warrior, Future Warrior and other "transformational" hahaha EDIT promises to care about how, according to
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/us-military-news-reports-data-etc.t1547/page-564#post-400380

but yeah, only time can tell

Well there is a major difference between programs like the FCS and these, that being that There is no monster over all program here. FCS was all encompassing with a whole army rebuild in mind these are more in system changes and most are ready to go. lets take a second and go over it
  1. M4A1 Carbine, Already in system and being phased as full Army infantry weapon. Off the shelf upgrades available like rail systems optics and sights.
  2. XM17, Controversial but not reaching for the stars, could be scaled down to a off the shelf offerings using a standardized calibre short list Smith and Wesson M&P series, Beretta P4X, Glock, FNH FNX series, HK VP series. or stay with the developmental, although There is the old fall back to upgrade the M9.
  3. CSASS, Off the shelf product Already in service with Germany and available to the civilian market.
  4. XM25, Established program of Record, recently updated electronics and operation. was fielded to afghanistan for field trials.
  5. IRAP (Increase Range Anti-Personnel) the Israelis and singapore are already working along similar lines, the Marines want as they do not look into XM25. and given that the XM25 fires 25mm well these would be larger 40mm it seems realistic.
  6. XM1112 Again seems possible if you can airburst explosives than why not less lethal?
  7. XM1116 smaller program for rubber slugs.
  8. Integrated Head Protection System/Light Weight Army Combat Helmet The Army has been working on this for almost a decade, They have offerings available from Revision Military, Crye Precision, Opscore and 3M.
  9. Torso and Extremities Protection system Again been under work for a decade with parts from off the shelf. Heck the brits are fielding something very similar
  10. Joint Effects Targeting System, developmental but on track with all the services.
  11. ENVG III Already in down select.
  12. FWS Individual Likely to be around sooner than latter
  13. FWS crew serviced if the individual is go then why not?
  14. FWS-Sniper again.
  15. Pocket-drones Prox Dynamics' PD-100 Black Hornet is ready to go already fielding.
  16. Lightning Pack Rucksack Harvester... Possible I am not too sold on the idea but It's possible
  17. Wearable Solar,
    Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

  18. harvest knees I prefer the pack over this as it's like the reverse of a lower extremity exosuit ( IE making it harder not easier to move. ) but in testing.
Almost every thing on this list is actually ready to field or at high practical reality. the Author did not add any heavy concept systems
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Carrier Eisenhower Deploys for Europe, Middle East
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Replace Truman in 5th Fleet

CSG 10, is comprised of the aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69)., the nine squadrons of Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 3, Destroyer Squadron (DESRON) 26 staff, the guided missile cruisers USS San Jacinto (CG 56) and USS Monterey (CG 61), and the guided-missile destroyers USS Stout (DDG 55), USS Roosevelt (DDG 80), USS Mason (DDG 87) and USS Nitze (DDG 94).

Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 3
VFA 32 “Swordsmen,” 12 F/A-18F
VFA 86 “Sidewinders,” 12 F/A-18E
VFA 105 “Gunslingers,” 12 F/A-18E
VFA 131 “Wildcats;” 10 F/A-18C
VAQ 130 “Zappers;” 5 EA-18G
VAW 123 “Screwtops;” 4 E-2C
VRC 40 Dét “Rawhides;” 2 C-2A
HSM 74 “Swamp Foxes;" 7/8 MH-60S
HSC 7 “Dusty Dogs.” 7/11 MH-60R


To 10th mn
 
...
Well there is a major difference between programs like the FCS and these, that being that There is no monster over all program here. ...

... picking up which has like date on it, your #15 above
(in https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/us-military-news-reports-data-etc.t1547/page-564#post-400382)
15. Pocket-drones
...
When might you have one? By 2018.
...

which you described, and I put in boldface, below:
FCS was all encompassing with a whole army rebuild in mind these are more in system changes and most are ready to go. lets take a second and go over it
  1. M4A1 Carbine, Already in system and being phased as full Army infantry weapon. Off the shelf upgrades available like rail systems optics and sights.
  2. XM17, Controversial but not reaching for the stars, could be scaled down to a off the shelf offerings using a standardized calibre short list Smith and Wesson M&P series, Beretta P4X, Glock, FNH FNX series, HK VP series. or stay with the developmental, although There is the old fall back to upgrade the M9.
  3. CSASS, Off the shelf product Already in service with Germany and available to the civilian market.
  4. XM25, Established program of Record, recently updated electronics and operation. was fielded to afghanistan for field trials.
  5. IRAP (Increase Range Anti-Personnel) the Israelis and singapore are already working along similar lines, the Marines want as they do not look into XM25. and given that the XM25 fires 25mm well these would be larger 40mm it seems realistic.
  6. XM1112 Again seems possible if you can airburst explosives than why not less lethal?
  7. XM1116 smaller program for rubber slugs.
  8. Integrated Head Protection System/Light Weight Army Combat Helmet The Army has been working on this for almost a decade, They have offerings available from Revision Military, Crye Precision, Opscore and 3M.
  9. Torso and Extremities Protection system Again been under work for a decade with parts from off the shelf. Heck the brits are fielding something very similar
  10. Joint Effects Targeting System, developmental but on track with all the services.
  11. ENVG III Already in down select.
  12. FWS Individual Likely to be around sooner than latter
  13. FWS crew serviced if the individual is go then why not?
  14. FWS-Sniper again.
  15. Pocket-drones Prox Dynamics' PD-100 Black Hornet is ready to go already fielding.
  16. Lightning Pack Rucksack Harvester... Possible I am not too sold on the idea but It's possible
  17. Wearable Solar,
    Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

  18. harvest knees I prefer the pack over this as it's like the reverse of a lower extremity exosuit ( IE making it harder not easier to move. ) but in testing.
Almost every thing on this list is actually ready to field or at high practical reality. the Author did not add any heavy concept systems
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
three years from now, TE? would be 6/2/19

EDIT
I'm fed up with those US-Military-about-to-get-this-and-that-fancy-equipment announcements: they're actually pathetic if one noticed the respective program had been killed soon after such an announcement was made ... but I'm of course giving the benefit of the doubt to #15 so that it wouldn't be me who was pathetic :)
 
Last edited:

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
I have to back track a bit.
Army wants mini-drones for its squads by 2018
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, Army Times4:57 p.m. EDT April 3, 2016
The Army is moving forward with a plan to put pocket-sized drones in the hands of its dismounted soldiers by 2018.

The service on March 1 requested information papers from industry on what technology might be available for what it’s calling Soldier Borne Sensors. The Maneuver Center of Excellence at Fort Benning, Georgia, has a preliminary set of requirements and plans to go back-and-forth with industry on what already exists or could become quickly available.

“We’ve had numerous studies as well as experimentation within our battle labs. We continue to see that soldiers are kind of lacking at the squad level for relevant information that’s immediately around them,” said Phil Cheatum, deputy branch chief of electronics and special developments at MCoE.

But he also added: “We don’t know what we don’t know about what’s out there right now.”

Unmanned aerial systems such as the Gray Eagle and Shadow, which are part of larger units, have improved situational awareness for the Army. But a squad trying to clear a city block or go over a hill can remain blind to more detailed and rapidly changing threats. A quickly-deployable SBS would give squads real-time ability to inspect its most intimate threats.

The technology and concept are not new. British and Norwegian forces have been using PD-100 Black Hornet drones since about 2012, and the British have heavily leaned on them in Afghanistan. Last spring, the Army
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
along with a number of other gadgets at Maneuver Battle Lab Army Expeditionary Warrior Experiments at Fort Benning. U.S. special operations forces have deployed with them.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, soldiers said the Black Hornet would have been invaluable during past deployments.

“I was in Basra [Iraq]. There's a lot of roads that you don't really know where they go," Staff Sgt. Andrew Smith told Army Times. "In Afghanistan, I can't tell you the number of times you just want to know what's on the other side of a hill."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Requirements for SBS — informed by experimentation efforts like AEWE — remain preliminary and fluid at this point; the Army isn’t publicizing specifics. But Cheatum laid out some basics:

• Max weight of 150 grams:The device should weigh less than a third of a pound and ideally fit into a cargo pocket to avoid adding any additional burden to soldiers already loaded down with gear.

• Deployable within 60 seconds:Soldiers should be able to get it in the air quickly.

• A 15-minute flight time:The Army needs the SBS to stay in the air long enough to capture relevant information and, ideally, return to its operator.

• Capable camera:Cheatum said it should be able to detect a human-sized object within 50 to 75 feet with “90 percent probability.” The camera will provide soldiers a real-time feed.

• Wind tolerance of 10 to 15 knots:While such a small UAS likely won’t fly in rough conditions, Cheatum said the SBS should be able to operate in light winds.

• Range of 500 to 1,200 meters:With line of sight, the drone should be operable from a reasonable distance, with the ability to bring it home after gathering the intel.

The Black Hornet weighs just over half an ounce (18 grams) and, including the controller, the system weighs just under three pounds (1.3 kg) total, according to maker
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. It can fly for about 25 minutes at speeds of up to 11 miles per hour and has a line-of-sight range of 1600 meters. Cameras can be aimed and send a live feed to the controller while also able to take more detailed still shots.

According to the British Ministry of Defence, a 2013 Black Hornet contract for 160 units
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(roughly $30 million, or about $190,000 per PD-100).
Price bolded, underlined and Italicized for sticker shock.
The problem is that Black Hornet is not quite a production piece. It's actually hand made. I consider it realistic but only if the price drops hence the 3 years to redesign and re gear to a more budget friendly model.
 
I have to back track a bit.
...
you know, TE, I think it would useful for the US Army Public Relations to inform about something what has been actually fielded most recently instead of producing supposedly "cool" info full of "soon", "might", "possibly", "in the pipeline", "futuristic", "unbelievable", ...
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Well Jura, I don't think this was a full In Army listing the objects on the list are more of a summery of programs targeted. The list lacks a number of others in the pipe. The Magazine I pulled the articular from maybe called Army times but it's not part of the DOD or Depratment of the Army it's a Garrett news group magazine that specializes in DOD and Army related news.
 
Well Jura, I don't think this was a full In Army listing the objects on the list are more of a summery of programs targeted. The list lacks a number of others in the pipe. The Magazine I pulled the articular from maybe called Army times but it's not part of the DOD or Depratment of the Army it's a Garrett news group magazine that specializes in DOD and Army related news.
I know I should take it easy :) just wonder when the US Army gets new
  • main battle tank
  • infantry fighting vehicle
  • field howitzer
  • multiple launch rocket system
and so on and so forth, as I think this is what matters, not the pocket drone, bro
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
I know I should take it easy :) just wonder when the US Army gets new
  • main battle tank
  • infantry fighting vehicle
  • field howitzer
  • multiple launch rocket system
and so on and so forth, as I think this is what matters, not the pocket drone, bro
for the US Army major systems
Abrams upgrade is in development.
Stryker is being converted into a IFV
M109A7 is slated for full rate in february with the M777 in service
M270 MLRS is pretty much the world standard.
.Chances of a new vehicle right now are very low as more upgrades for those more than replacements. and given the state of the art That's more or less where the world is.
The biggest changes on the way for the Army right now is drones, sensors, protection, power management and communications.
lookig back at the list 1-7 are small arms updates. 8 and 9 are personal protection, 10-15 are sensors and drones, 16-18 are power management. out of that there is the Future of Rotary wing but that is mid 2020's earliest so... You may not be a infantry guy Jura but that was what was happening.
Thunderbirds F-16 crashes following Air Force Academy graduation
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, Air Force Times4:05 p.m. EDT June 2, 2016

One of the Air Force’s elite Thunderbird pilots crashed Thursday following a fly-over for the Air Force Academy’s graduation ceremony.

The F-16 crashed near Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado, shortly after the flyover, an Air Force official said . A spokesperson for the Thunderbirds, assigned to the 57th Wing at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, said the unit is in contact with its team on the ground.

The pilot of the no. 6 jet, one of the solo pilot aircraft, ejected safely and seems to be unhurt, Air Combat Command confirmed on Twitter.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The pilot of the #6 jet ejected safely and is walking around unhurt. More details will be released as they become available. 2/2

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



The pilot ejected south of the Colorado Springs airport, and is being evaluated by the Colorado Springs Fire Department, according to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Twitter pictures appear to show the F-16 Falcon in the middle of a field following the crash.

The official said the Air Force will perform a "thorough investigation into the causes of the mishap, and those findings will be released when the investigation is complete."

Air Force Times will update this story when more information becomes available.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top