US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

that's tough ... is all I dare to say:
The U.S. needs to revisit our PTSD treatment guidelines
Post-traumatic stress disorder is arguably the most challenging problem combat veterans face. Estimates vary, but experts believe that between 10 and 20 percent of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans suffer from the disorder. This puts the actual number of men and women affected in the hundreds of thousands.

Considering that PTSD wreaks havoc on the veteran and their loved ones, and costs billions of dollars each year, finding and using the most effective treatments are critical.

Historically, medications and talk therapy have been considered "first-line treatments." This basically means they should be used first, and if they fail, then you try something else. In fact, the joint treatment guidelines published by the Department of Defense and Veterans Affairs Department puts medications and psychotherapy on equaling footing. The same is true for the American Psychiatric Association.

Not all agree.

Organizations from the United Kingdom and Australia and the World Health Organization take the position that trauma-focused psychotherapies such as prolonged exposure, cognitive processing therapy, and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing are most effective when it comes to PTSD treatment. Basically, their stance is that the evidence for meds is just not as strong. A recent study carried out by military and VA researchers, and published in the journal Depression and Anxiety, supports this position.

After weeding through more than 60,000 possibilities, the researchers identified 55 psychotherapy and medication studies for PTSD. This added up to around 6,300 total study participants.

What did they find? Trauma-focused psychotherapies outperformed psychotherapies that do not specifically discuss the trauma. They also beat out medications.

This does not mean other psychotherapies are useless. For example, the researchers noted that stress inoculation training is effective for PTSD. SIT is a credible talk therapy that has been around for decades. It just may not be as effective as the trauma-focused therapies.

The same is true for medications. Zoloft and Effexor are commonly used for PTSD, and they do work for some people. But again, they may not be as useful as certain psychotherapies.

The bottom line is that the current United States-based treatment guidelines for PTSD may need to join the ranks of their European and Australian counterparts. Specifically, medications likely need to be identified as "second-line" treatments. In other words, they should only be used if an effective talk therapy is not available.

The results of this study challenge the current status quo with regard to treating our combat veterans. It is time to take a close look at how we prioritize PTSD treatments and make adjustments to our national treatment guidelines as necessary.
source is yesterday's NavyTimes:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
A fighter can be compared to a sport car we want it pretty and damage now in general less nice painting, more rare for stealth maybe normal but however damage, acccordings pics we can see US Naval Aviation retains more this tradition often her fighters get it for me they are now the specialist for painting and i enjoy much look it in general it is the fighter of the boss of the unit which get it and very frequently.

Mainly Western countries do it Russians, Chinese very few tradition matter possible.

In 1960's completely different for tactical matter etc... i have a F-104 the rocket... with tiny wings, dangerous ! in 1/72 in full aluminum color unusual but not very discreet vs a Mig :D

This USAF F-15 i have posted several times get an amazing look, in France as others AF specials painting for some events, anniversary of the unit especialy but we go soon for a nice new NATO Tiger Meet and i am going for catch it :p
 
Last edited:

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Very good

When the new Sqn on F-35B will be complete in july AV-8B Sqns get again 16 right now temporarily 14 same after for F-18 10 to 12.

3rd MAW Preparing To Deploy F-35B While Struggling To Keep Older Planes Ready: An Operational Perspective

This article is part of a two-story package on the current state of Marine Corps aviation. Please read
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
for the headquarters perspective.

The flight line at Yuma Marine Corps Air Station, Ariz., got busier on Monday when two operational F-35B Joint Strike Fighter jets arrived at their new West Coast home. The single-seat jets are the first to join Marine Attack Squadron 211, which has flown the AV-8B Harrier II jump jet as part of 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing (MAW).

Next month, the “Avengers” of VMA-211 will be redesignated as Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 211 (VMFA-211) and continue to grow with additional jets, marking a key milestone as the Marine Corps’ second operational squadron to transition to the F-35B Lightning II.

The desert base is a temporary home for the Corps’ first operational squadron of the next-generation jet. In January, VMFA-121, the first tactical unit to get the F-35B, will relocate from Yuma to Japan, Maj. Gen. Michael Rocco told an audience at Point Loma Naval Base in San Diego on Tuesday.

The squadron, nicknamed the “Green Dragons,” will be forward-deployed to Iwakuni MCAS, where it will join 1st MAW and support 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit and III Marine Expeditionary Force.
The Marine Corps is working “hand in hand” with the Navy to prepare for the F-35B to deploy aboard ship with an amphibious ready group, or ARG, later next year. “The ships are being reconfigured for the JSF,” Rocco said. That includes modifying flight decks to handle the heat from the jet while it’s in the VTOL, or vertical takeoff and landing, mode, as well as incorporating various communications and electronic warfare suites.

“The first deployment on an ARG will be out in WestPac (Western Pacific) on the 31st MEU in the fall of ’17,” Rocco said.

“We’ll get the squadron out there, a 10-plane squadron, in January 2017. We’ll put six more aircraft out there in the summer of ’17 and then in the fall of ’17 is when the ship will be ready” to take on the jets.

Rocco, who commands 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing at Miramar MCAS in San Diego, said the F-35 presence in the western Pacific will bolster military capability in the region. The jet is equipped with advanced sensors and provides greater digital interoperability and improved lethality against air and ground targets than older legacy aircraft it will replace. Much of the jet’s capabilities are “so classified, you can’t even talk about it,” Rocco said during the monthly meeting of the San Diego Military Advisory Council, a non-profit group supporting the military and defense community in the region.

“It’s remarkable,” he said. “Most people are not aware of the capabilities of that aircraft. But trust me when I say it: That is a game-changing aircraft.”
The aircraft continues to undergo additional testing and software upgrades, however. The Marine Corps expects to transition its third operational squadron in 2018, with VMFA-122 trading its Hornets for F-35Bs and shifting to Yuma, according to the 2016 Marine Aviation Plan.
The Marine Corps is counting on the multi-role JSF to replace its aging fleets of Harrier attack jets and F/A-18 Hornet jets.

“We at Miramar are going to transition to the JSF a couple of years early,” he told the San Diego audience, with all local squadrons transitioning by 2019, or two or three years earlier than officials initially planned. With that, he noted, “there’s some stuff that needs to happen, like hangars and some big buildings for (military) construction” to support those units.

The Marine Corps, and particularly Marine aviation, is undergoing a major transformation as the service presses ahead to modernize and reset its war-wearied force. It’s doing that while grappling with significant maintenance and parts shortfalls, reduced readiness and continued operational demands.

The Miramar-based 3rd MAW has fully transitioned to the UH-1Y “Yankee” utility helicopter that replaced the Vietnam-era Hueys, Rocco said. It has “one more squadron” to fully transition its attack-utility helicopter fleet from the AH-1W to the AH-1Z Super Cobra, he said. “We’re going to introduce that aircraft to Okinawa pretty soon.”

As for the MV-22 Osprey, which the Marine Corps counts on for medium-lift missions, “we are still in the throes of transitioning the V-22 squadrons,” Rocco said, and the wing will get two additional squadrons

“The V-22 is the most requested aircraft in all of DoD,” he said. “Those Marines that are in the V-22 world — both the pilots and the maintainers — stay extremely busy. If you are a V-22 pilot, a captain, you’re pretty much stuck in the squadron.”

“Their tempo is spending six months overseas or on a MEU or Special Purpose MAGTF, then back for about a year — MEU squadrons get a little more time, Special Purpose squadrons get a little less time. And then they go right back out.”

There’s a cost for that high operational tempo, however. “I’ll tell you who’s tired: The families are tired,” Rocco said. Marines “really don’t get to do much else but say goodbye to their families, and when they get back (home), they do it all over again.”

Another sought-out aircraft is the CH-53E Super Stallion, the Marine Corps’ heavy lifter. But the maintenance-demanding aircraft continues to suffer with degraded readiness and availability, concerns raised by officials in testimony to Congress.

“We can’t do our mission in the Marine Corps without the CH-53. It is the only heavy-lift platform that we have, and it is the last to transition,” Rocco said. Its replacement, the CH-53K, “is doing very well” but isn’t anticipated to arrive until 2019.

The Super Stallion, a “beast of an aircraft,” he said, “is old. It is tired.” Marines maintaining the aircraft “are working their backsides over to get that aircraft flying,” he added, noting “we don’t give (them) enough credit.”

Rocco, a veteran AH-1W Super Cobra pilot, commands a wing that includes about 100 aircraft and 16,000 Marines and sailors in five air groups. Wing Marines currently are supporting operations in Yemen, Iraq, Kuwait and southern Syria, as well as in Japan in Okinawa and Iwakuni, and with the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit.

“It’s a busy wing,” Rocco said. “Do we have challenges? Absolutely. Do we have all the aircraft we need? No, we don’t. Do we have all the parts we need? No, we don’t,” he said. “But when we talk about execution, about ‘be ready’… 99.4 (percent of required flight hours executed) outstrips any other wing in the Marine Corps.”

Still, he said, shortages in parts lead to cannabalizing aircraft for parts and putting more hours on the available aircraft. That practice, though, comes at a price he likened to “eating our seed corn a little bit.”

“Because we’re running that aircraft longer than we ever thought, parts that we’d never anticipated breaking we are breaking,” he added. He’s seeing similar patterns with the CH-53E and MV-22. Shortages of parts lead to cannabalization that then requires at least twice the amount of work and time. “We can’t afford to wait for the parts. We can’t afford to wait for the aircraft,” he said. “We have to be ready. We are on a 1:2 dwell.”

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


US-Navys-eighth-Independence-variant-LCS-completes-acceptance-trials.jpg

Navy Today said:
Australian-based shipbuilder Austal has announced that littoral combat ship 8 (LCS 8), the future USS Montgomery, successfully completed U.S. Navy acceptance trials.

The trials, the last significant milestone before delivery involved comprehensive testing of the vessel’s major systems and equipment by the U.S. Navy.

According to Austal, delivery of the ship to the Navy is planned for later this spring.

During the four-day trial, the Navy conducted comprehensive tests intended to demonstrate the performance of the propulsion plant, ship handling, and auxiliary systems.

While underway, the ship performed launch and recovery operations of the 11-meter rigid hull inflatable boat (RHIB), a four-hour full power run, surface and air self-defense detect-to-engage exercises, and demonstrated the ship’s maneuverability performing tight turns and accomplishing speeds in excess of 40 knots.

“Ship after ship, we continue to see improved performance at lower cost,” said LCS program manager for the US Navy, Capt. Tom Anderson.

“Montgomery’s strong performance during acceptance trials is a testament to the Navy/Industry team that has labored to incorporate lessons learned and deliver this exceptional and affordable ship.”

After LCS 8, Austal will deliver a further nine Independence-variant littoral combat ships from its shipyard in Mobile, Alabama, under a U.S. Navy contract for 11 ships worth over US$3.5 billion. Of those, Gabrielle Giffords (LCS 10) and Omaha (LCS 12) are preparing for trials, Manchester (LCS 14) was recently christened, final assembly is well underway on Tulsa (LCS 16), and modules for Charleston (LCS 18) and Cincinnati (LCS 20) are under construction in Austal’s module manufacturing facility.

Lockheed Martin, the other shipbuilder in the littoral combat ship program, is responsible for the construction of Freedom-variant LCS.
 
Screen-Shot-2016-05-16-at-12.03.08-PM-e1463415824321.png

Screen-Shot-2016-03-31-at-6.43.59-PM.png

I haven't heard of it until now:
AeroVironment to Supply Blackwing Mini UAVs for Navy Attack, Guided Missile Submarines
The Navy has selected the unmanned aerial vehicle manufacturer AeroVironment to supply miniature UAVs for the service’s fleet of attack and guided missile submarines and unmanned underwater vehicles, the company announced on Monday during the Sea-Air-Space 2016 Exposition.

The three-inch Blackwing UAVs, “are part of Advanced Weapons Enhanced by Submarine UAS against Mobile targets (AWESUM) demonstrates submarine launch, data sharing and control across the Joint Force,” read a March statement from the Navy to USNI News on the program.

The company did neither disclose the numbers of UAVS nor the contract amount.
AeroVironment had begun developing Blackwing in 2013 using technology inherent in the company’s backpack transportable Switchblade design, according to the Monday statement.

“Blackwing employs an advanced, miniature electro-optical and infrared (EO/IR) payload, Selective Availability Anti-spoofing Module (SASSM) GPS and AeroVironment’s secure Digital Data Link (DDL), all packaged into a vehicle that launches from manned and unmanned submarines,” read the statement from the company.

The service recently decided to move from a test program to operationalize the program and start acquiring more units for the entire submarine fleet,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

“So there’s 150 small unmanned aerial systems coming in on submarines, so we’re now buying them,” Richard said.
“It’s not something that you would [just] see on a PowerPoint presentation. These are fully integrated they’ll go in talk back to the ship, talk to the combat control system.”

In a 2013 briefing on the AWESUM program, the Navy said the Blackwing could communicate with submarines antennas and provide targeting information to aircraft through Link 16 data links. The Blackwings can also be weaponized to provide additional protection to submarines operating closer to shore. The program was developed in conjunction with U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) and could also provide information, surveillance and reconnaissance for Special Operations Forces (SOF).
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
related to Apr 6, 2016
is it that bad, or just an attempt to get more money?
Budget cuts are forcing the Army to lose its competitive edge

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
plus Apr 8, 2016
related:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and to disinterest here :) is the article date May 12, 2016
The U.S. Army’s War Over Russia
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
LRASM news:
Release No: CR-091-16
May 13, 2016


CONTRACTS


NAVY


Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control, Orlando, Florida, is being awarded a $321,847,403 cost-plus-incentive-fee contract for research and development in support of the Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM) integration and test phase. The integration and test phase completes all remaining hardware and software detailed design; systemically retiring any open risks; building and testing missile test articles to verify compliance with capability requirements; and preparing for production and/or deployment. This phase also completes full system integration; incorporates an affordable and executable LRASM manufacturing process into the existing Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile – Extended Range production process; examines and defines the logistics footprint; designs for producibility; ensures affordability; protects critical program information by implementing appropriate techniques such as anti-tamper and cybersecurity; and demonstrates system integration, interoperability, safety and utility. Work will be performed in Orlando, Florida (60 percent); Troy, Alabama (30 percent); and Ocala, Florida (10 percent), and is expected to be completed in August, 2019. Fiscal 2016 research, development, test and evaluation (Navy) funds in the amount of $42,000,000 will be obligated at time of award, none of which will expire at the end of the fiscal year. This contract was not competitively procured pursuant to Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.302-1. The Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Maryland, is the contracting activity (N00019-16-C-0035).
source is very official:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


and if you wanted to bet your money on LM :) you should perhaps read
Lockheed Martin Unit Wins $322M Deal for LRASM Support
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
But your funny dude :D

USMC aviation 2nd part :cool: long the more intereting

USMC Emphasizing Spare Parts, Maintainer Training To Regain Aviation Readiness: A Headquarters Perspective

This article is part of a two-story package on the current state of Marine Corps aviation. Please read
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
for the operational perspective.


...

Harriers
The Marine Corps tackled its Harrier readiness problem first. In the summer of 2014, when the independent readiness review started, the service had only 48 Ready Basic aircraft in its gun squadrons – not including planes for the training squadrons – and the independent review determined the Marine Corps would need 66 Ready Basic aircraft to meet its flight hour goals for Harrier pilots.

After beginning a two-year readiness recovery plan in January 2015, “we’re at 61 Harriers today, so we are executing our plan with great help from Congress and a very measured approach to how we’re doing business,” Davis said, adding the service is on track to reach 66 within the two-year window.

Today pilots are flying 15.4 hours a month with 11 Ready Basic aircraft in each squadron, and they’re on a path to get to 16 hours a month with 12 ready aircraft per squadron, thanks to the Marine Corps implementing 84 actions in the readiness recovery plan – most of them related to ensuring the right spare parts are available to fix planes as soon as they go down, he said.

In fact, the plan is going well enough that the Marines may hang on to some of the Harriers a bit longer than planned, allowing the service to transition some F-18 squadrons to F-35B squadrons ahead of schedule to compensate for the severe readiness problems in the Hornet community, Davis said.

“We will probably slow down the Harrier transition a little bit and emphasize F-18,” he said, noting that the Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 122 Hornet squadron’s transition has been accelerated.

“We have a decision point in 2019 to say do we want to change it up some more? So we have the flexibility inside the Marine Corps to change up the transition schedule” as conditions in the legacy tactical air community dictate.

V-22
Next in line for readiness recovery is the V-22 Osprey – which reached initial operational capability only nine years ago but is “the most in-demand airplane in the world, and we’re loving it to death.”
Davis said this fleet has been operating at surge capacity since it was fielded and shows no sign of slowing down. Readiness has degraded because the tiltrotors are being used faster than ready forces can be generated. In theory, for every V-22 squadron deployed in a Marine Expeditionary Unit, one is just getting home and another is training to go out next. With three MEUs out at any given time, the Marines would need nine squadrons to sustain this 1:2 deployment-to-dwell ratio.
However, the V-22s are now also used in land-based Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Forces (MAGTFs) in U.S. Central Command and U.S. Africa Command – meaning five squadrons are deployed and 15 would be needed to sustain.

“I’ve got 14. For a long time I had 13,” Davis said.
“So what that means is, we were moving maintainers from unit to unit to unit. Our [deployment] tempo is 1:2, or less than 1:2 in V-22. Going aboard the ship, going to Special Purpose MAGTF, basically we have no breathing space for our pilots or our maintainers in V-22. We have been at surge since 2007. … The airplane’s been incredible, just been incredible, but we’re basically outstripping our ability… to sustain it with spare parts and train the maintainers.”

The deployment tempo has not only taken its toll on the planes themselves, but also the personnel. There are no V-22 captains at the Expeditionary Warfare School and none serving as forward air controllers – both great career advancement opportunities – because they’re so busy operating at a surge rate.

The Defense Secretary recently approved a decision to cut the number of V-22s in the Special Purpose MAGTF- Africa from 12 to six, as well as cutting the number of C-130Js from four to two, giving the Marines a little more capacity for proper training at home.

“They’re still standing up squadrons and trying to make a move to Hawaii and everything else,” Davis said of the V-22 community.

“So we’re going to pull back a little bit from our overseas commitment in order to plus-up our training base and basically give us some breathing room.”

Any emerging requirements that can’t be met by the half-sized Osprey squadron in the Special Purpose MAGTF would be taken on by the nearest MEU, he said.

The service is still developing its V-22 readiness recovery plan now and will implement changes as needed, Davis said, but he’s optimistic that a slower operational tempo will help. Marine Helicopter Squadron (HMX) 1, the presidential helicopter squadron, is prioritized for obvious reasons. It has a stable base of maintainers with a stable workload, and it gets all the spare parts it needs in a timely fashion. As a result, HMX-1 had a 94 percent readiness rate over the last six months and only a 2.6 percent not mission capable- supply rate – a tenth of what the rest of the V-22 fleet saw – showing that the planes work just fine when properly cared for.

A Marine inspects an F/A-18C Hornet from Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 323, Jan. 7, 2015. US Marine Corps photo.

F-18
The Marine Corps’ challenge with the Hornet fleet is unique. It is the biggest user of the legacy Hornet – the Navy is using its newer Super Hornets while the older planes are stuck in a depot logjam, whereas the Marine Corps is just not meeting its flight hour goals.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
as the legacy planes go through a Service Life Extension Program (SLEP), and with depot productivity up “now it’s about just kind of burning through the backlog,” he said.

“We’re just shy of what we need to be producing out of the depots to do that, but I’m not sure that throwing any more money at the depot is the answer to that, we’ve just got to encourage them to do good work and to basically make their gates,” Davis said.

“But also too the answer for the Marine Corps to the readiness challenge inside TACAIR is, we have some really old airplanes” that average 26 years old and have “some life left in them but not a lot, so the answer is to recapitalize with F-35 as quickly as we can.”

VMFA-121 is already up and running, with VMFA-211 standing up next month and VMFA-122 next after that. VMFA-314 will then become the Marines’ first F-35C carrier variant squadron. Though the squadrons have been slow to stand up so far, they will begin transitioning faster.

“We are going now from I would say is a very anemic production ramp rate on the F-35 to a healthy ramp rate. Could be healthier, but between 20 and 24 airplanes a year for both the F-35B and C – and all the Bs go to the Marine Corps – so that’s in excess of two squadrons a year that we can stand up and get going. So real goodness there,” Davis said.

That rate will “allow me to shut down F-18 squadrons faster” and “get out of the old metal into the new.”
Davis has said since before the Marine Corps declared initial operational capability on the F-35B that the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, and he said he’s paying close attention to that supply logistics chain to avoid the problems plaguing the rest of Marine aviation.
As for the maintainers, he said there’s a lot of excitement today about the F-35 transition and “right now we have just an exceptionally well trained F-35 fleet of mechanics. They are world-class. I’m going to go out of my way to retain them.”

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


.
 
Yesterday at 11:12 PM
Screen-Shot-2016-05-16-at-12.03.08-PM-e1463415824321.png

Screen-Shot-2016-03-31-at-6.43.59-PM.png

I haven't heard of it until now:
AeroVironment to Supply Blackwing Mini UAVs for Navy Attack, Guided Missile Submarines

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
related:
US Navy plans to launch drones from submarines
US-Navy-plans-to-launch-drones-from-submarines-320x308.jpg
The U.S. Navy is looking to deploy a small, tube-launched unmanned aircraft system that deploys from under the surface of the sea, on manned submarines and unmanned underwater vehicles.

The system is named Blackwing™ and is being developed by the American technology company AeroVironment.

AeroVironment developed the Blackwing system as part of a 2013 Navy and United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) sponsored Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD) called Advanced Weapons Enhanced by Submarine UAS against Mobile targets (AWESUM).

Blackwing employs a miniature electro-optical and infrared (EO/IR) payload, Selective Availability Anti-spoofing Module (SASSM) GPS and AeroVironment’s secure Digital Data Link (DDL).

Apart from from being capable of launching from manned and unmanned submarines, Blackwing can also be integrated with and deployed from a wide variety of surface vessels and mobile ground vehicles.

“AeroVironment’s new Blackwing unmanned aircraft system is a valuable new capability that resulted from our team’s close collaboration with, and responsiveness to, the U.S. Navy’s undersea warfare community and the Special Operations community,” said Kirk Flittie, AeroVironment vice president and general manager of its Unmanned Aircraft Systems business segment.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

strehl

Junior Member
Registered Member
The navy decided the Top Gun school for fighter tactics could be used as a model for other disciplines and started up a surface warfare school based on the same principles. Different locations are used for specific areas of expertise including anti-mine warfare and surface combat in addition to others.

 
Top