US INF withdraw and possible new land-based missiles deployed in Asia.

Discussion in 'World Armed Forces' started by Pika, Aug 3, 2019.

  1. SamuraiBlue
    Offline

    SamuraiBlue Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2013
    Messages:
    2,071
    Likes Received:
    1,964
    Ignorance and arrogance goes hand in hand I see.
     
  2. Brumby
    Offline

    Brumby Major

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    3,575
    Likes Received:
    3,680
    There are many good reasons to forward deploy. However I would seriously doubt whether it is cheaper if objectively based on cost data. I have been posted to many locations in my lifetime and I can confidently say expats are very expensive once you factor in international schooling, home leave, housing, tax equalization and relocation expenses.
     
  3. SamuraiBlue
    Offline

    SamuraiBlue Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2013
    Messages:
    2,071
    Likes Received:
    1,964
    Sorry but deploying an IRBM requires a large storage facility and manpower whether it be stationary or mobile.
    I further doubt it will be mobile since it will require to transit through populated areas which will hit top news which will instantly call for an uproar in which the cabinet will be ousted and have the missiles removed.
    Same with stationary IRBM since you'll need to construct a large bunker structure which will be most visible to the general populous.
     
    Brumby likes this.
  4. Viktor Jav
    Offline

    Viktor Jav Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2017
    Messages:
    1,036
    Likes Received:
    730
    Agree with Samurai here, you can't just park a bunch of IRBMs and its supporting facilities in another nation and not expect the local populance to be oblivious about it. And we are going to cut out the whole "Japanese politicians are deceptive/conniving" argument not just because it is ridiculous but also
    1) It is a very blatant racist/nationalistic ad homenim that the forum rules are strictly against.
    2) It is a very vague and requires such a huge amount of presupposition that it renders the entire argument moot
     
    SamuraiBlue, Brumby and TerraN_EmpirE like this.
  5. TerraN_EmpirE
    Offline

    TerraN_EmpirE Tyrant King

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    12,282
    Likes Received:
    10,628
    Thus far the US has yet to announce any new IRBM, the closest program known is the MLRS launched Precision Strike Missile. But that’s at the lower end of the game more of a Cruise Missile.
     
    antiterror13 and Brumby like this.
  6. antiterror13
    Offline

    antiterror13 Colonel

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,171
    Likes Received:
    4,542
    and it takes at least 5-10 years to approve budget, design. prototype, testing and testing ..... if not much more and at that time the new government (not Trump) will emerge and cancel the program
     
  7. TerraN_EmpirE
    Offline

    TerraN_EmpirE Tyrant King

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    12,282
    Likes Received:
    10,628
    That’s a long run program. If it’s a fast program then by year 5 the program could be in production with The current administration possibly finishing a second term and starting fielding.
     
  8. Dolcevita
    Offline

    Dolcevita Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2007
    Messages:
    1,012
    Likes Received:
    1,990
    Yet reality is the Japanese government refuses to ask if any Japan-based US facilities stores or transit nuclear weapons because it violates the constitution. That is the nuclear weapon and not the asking part. Do you see the irony?

    Japanese Government is known for being meticulous but not for this instance. It was intentionally overlooked with intent to deny. LOL

    Let's just pretend these are vehicles with empty shell.

    see no evil hear no evil and acknowledge no evil.
     
    #58 Dolcevita, Aug 11, 2019
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2019
    antiterror13 likes this.
  9. Anlsvrthng
    Offline

    Anlsvrthng Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2017
    Messages:
    1,203
    Likes Received:
    284
    Japan stockpile is high burn up commercial grade Pu, with lot of 240/242, HEU more usable for bomb, and commercial grade it is useless for hydrogen bomb.

    40°13'27.32" N 97°21'37.75" E
    32°29'41.73" N 105°35'28.89" E
     
  10. ZeEa5KPul
    Offline

    ZeEa5KPul Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    712
    Plutonium enrichment by centrifugation is generally considered infeasible because of the mass difference between isotopes - 1 for Pu 240/239 vs. 3 for U 238/235 - but there's an interesting laser enrichment technology that utilizes the difference in magnetic properties of the nuclei, not the mass difference, to preferentially ionize one isotope which can then be captured by an electric field. All the work I've seen on it uses uranium enrichment as an example, but it might be feasible to use it to enrich an existing commercial grade Pu stockpile.

    The 2.9+- 0.6 figure I've seen for China's plutonium stockpile is the weapons grade stuff, I wonder how much commerical grade plutonium it has.
     
Loading...

Share This Page