US INF withdraw and possible new land-based missiles deployed in Asia.

Discussion in 'World Armed Forces' started by Pika, Aug 3, 2019.

  1. Brumby
    Offline

    Brumby Major

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    3,591
    Likes Received:
    3,707
    The benefits are immediately obvious. The increased options and flexibility with more complex threat vectors will complicate adversarial missions planning from both offensive and defensive perspective.

    .
     
  2. Broccoli
    Offline

    Broccoli Junior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2012
    Messages:
    868
    Likes Received:
    542
    Because plutonium production requires differend kinda ractors what have unique heat signature, they release all kinda things into athmosphere where such things can be sniffed by sensors, infastructure isn't easy to hide and so on. All compact weapons China tested in 90s used plutonium or composite pits. HEU manufacturing is much easier to hide as centrifuges or other enchrichment ways don't have those problems plutonium production.


    There are many possibilities.

    - China's older plutonium based warheads what are/were used on DF-3, DF-4, DF-5 had lot of plutonium so they can get quite a lot by recycling.

    - It's also possible that they use composite pits on their 90s warheads aka making more by using both HEU + plutonium so each new warhead takes a smaller nible of fissile material stock.

    - Another possibility is that Chinese scientists have developed new HEU based weapon and trust that it works as well on real world as it does on computer simulations, etc.
     
    antiterror13 likes this.
  3. antiterror13
    Offline

    antiterror13 Colonel

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,208
    Likes Received:
    4,578
    true ....., but if the uncle Sam ask Japan, the constitution would change overnight in hurry and no question ask
     
  4. Anlsvrthng
    Offline

    Anlsvrthng Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2017
    Messages:
    1,221
    Likes Received:
    285
    -it require approx. 3TWyear to make one tonnes of Pu-239. This is a lot of heat , and as easy to hide as an elephant . The North38 periodically checking the NK pu reactor with satellite thermal images from commercial sources, I presume there are many hobbyist NGO who can afford the thermal images of 32°29'36.92" N 105°35'39.14" E. Up to date no one started to cry loudly due to heat emission from there.
    -The U235 primary require way more uranium, that reduce the load of ICBMs, and most likely require new tests to prove the design. It should be audible from many seismic observatory .


    But, interestingly, at the Chinese Oak Ridge they made a new building on the reactor site, they finished a new access bridge to the isotope separation site, and demolished the old bridge to the reactor site and there is building activity on a new bridge.

    So , there has been lot of investment activity into the site.

    But still no news about extreme level of continuous heat emission
     
  5. ZeEa5KPul
    Offline

    ZeEa5KPul Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    746
    I don't trust these plutonium stockpile figures for China at all. It's claimed that China has only 3 tons of Pu - for comparison, "pacifist" Japan has 46 tons. This is outlandish and if it's true then the Chinese government has been monstrously negligent. The most dangerous thing about China's nuclear doctrine is that it's morphed into a quasi-religion in the minds of Chinese strategists, rather than a policy that was suitable for its time and place. Now is no longer the time or place.

    Which facility are you referring to? There's the plant at Jiuquan and the one at Guangyuan.
     
  6. SamuraiBlue
    Online

    SamuraiBlue Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2013
    Messages:
    2,083
    Likes Received:
    1,967
    You really do not know how things work do you.
    To change the constitution you need 2/3 of both houses to agree to even take a national referendum in which majority of the general populous needs to agree.
    No it won't change just because the US demands it.
    It's up for the Japanese citizens to decide not the US.
     
    Brumby likes this.
  7. antiterror13
    Offline

    antiterror13 Colonel

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,208
    Likes Received:
    4,578
    it certainly will ..... why do you think the US has over 50k soldiers stationed in Japan ?
     
  8. localizer
    Offline

    localizer Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2018
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    1,069
    And Israel doesn’t have any.

    It’s pointless speculating how many.

    Does India and Pakistan have hydrogen bombs?
     
    antiterror13 likes this.
  9. antiterror13
    Offline

    antiterror13 Colonel

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,208
    Likes Received:
    4,578
    Neither India and Pakistan has a hydrogen bomb ... however India claimed have tested a thermonuclear weapon in 1998, however this is disputed by many
     
    Broccoli and localizer like this.
  10. TerraN_EmpirE
    Offline

    TerraN_EmpirE Tyrant King

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    12,368
    Likes Received:
    10,707
    Because it’s cheaper to house them there than California.
    Seriously. Two weeks back I heard an interview with the Japanese foreign minister who said just that.
     
    antiterror13 likes this.
Loading...

Share This Page