UK Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Discussion in 'World Armed Forces' started by FuManChu, Sep 10, 2006.

  1. Equation
    Offline

    Equation Lieutenant General

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    10,936
    Likes Received:
    13,360
    Why would that matter? Do you think the Iranians have gone mad and are just trying to seize random ships? What, now China needs to guard her ships too or the Iranians will try to seize them?
     
    taxiya likes this.
  2. TerraN_EmpirE
    Offline

    TerraN_EmpirE Tyrant King

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    11,906
    Likes Received:
    10,271
    It’s the Protection racket. China pays so they get “Insurance” for now. Those who don’t or worse put up a fight well they are targeted.
     
  3. timepass
    Offline

    timepass Brigadier

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    Messages:
    6,325
    Likes Received:
    10,728
  4. taxiya
    Offline

    taxiya Major
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2006
    Messages:
    3,491
    Likes Received:
    7,622
    I don't believe for a milli-second that China should be worried of "Iranian seizure".

    What I am very concerned is the repetition of Yinhe incident in 1993 by the "world police" in a long-arm "jurisdiction" according to domestic law against Chinese ships heading to or departing from Iran. The very recent hostage taking in Canada does imply that the same thing happens. I do hope PLAN's anti-piracy task force does keep an eye to the area to prevent another state piracy.

    Even if a seizure does not happen, a "mistake" can happen like 1999.
     
  5. Equation
    Offline

    Equation Lieutenant General

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    10,936
    Likes Received:
    13,360
    I'm sorry, what???!! In your imagination, China pays Iran protection/gangster fees so Iran doesn't seize Chinese ships??
     
    KIENCHIN likes this.
  6. Equation
    Offline

    Equation Lieutenant General

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    10,936
    Likes Received:
    13,360

    That was a sarcastic quip at how Brumby seems to think that Iran won't discriminate in its targets and thus Chinese ships are at highest risk due to volume and how Terran seems to think that China had paid Iran "protection" fees to keep its ships safe. Unequivocally, I think both are nonsense.

    I believe that in the 1993 Yinhe incident, what made the Chinese ship stop was that the US cut off GPS guidance; they could not forcibly board it. Because Yinhe could not sail without GPS, she eventually agreed to follow US ships into port at Saudi Arabia for inspection. This launched China's efforts to develop Beidou. Today, a Chinese ship would just sail on into Iran with Beidou; no other country has any authority over it.
     
    t2contra, KIENCHIN and taxiya like this.
  7. Jura
    Online

    Jura General

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    21,562
    Likes Received:
    26,800
    Wednesday at 9:18 AM
    while now the Type 45
    London sending warship to the Persian Gulf https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2019/07/12/london-sending-warship-to-the-persian-gulf/
     
Loading...

Share This Page