The Pentagon’s long-awaited
has been delayed more than just a few times, but the under secretary of defense for policy said he’s hopeful it’s coming out very soon.
“It will be coming soon to a theater near you,” John Rood, told an audience at a Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance event on Capitol Hill Sept. 4. “Hope to have that out in the very near term, in the next few weeks, as we just are wrapping up some of the remaining items.”
The Defense Department seems to have been wrapping up the review for the better part of a year, as it was
but was then delayed to February and again pushed back to a mid-May release.
Many expected the review to come out shortly before the Space and Missile Defense Symposium in early August, but, once again, it didn’t come, leaving an elephant in the room at the Huntsville-based event.
At the symposium, Pentagon leaders also managed to avoid questions related to reasons for the delay. Questions submitted via text by the audience there were handpicked by conference moderators throughout the event.
And because DoD leadership has been tight-lipped over the reasons for delaying the review, it has led many in the missile defense community to speculate reasons from a lack of satisfaction over the state of drafts to an increasingly complicated relationship with North Korea stemming from the Trump administration’s more recent dealings with the country’s leader, Kim Jong Un, who said he might be willing to back off some of his nuclear missile development.
Much of the U.S. homeland ballistic missile defense capability was developed in response to the growing threat of possible ballistic missile attacks from North Korea and Iran.
In April, Deputy Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan said the review had not yet come out due to quality. He characterized the delay as a mix of wanting to be thorough, the logistics of working on multiple reviews over the last six months and the need to have people in place, most notably Rood himself, who was confirmed in early January.
Shanahan added the Pentagon leadership spent the better part of the fall working on the
and the
, both which have now been out for months.
While Rood did not discuss the reasons for the delay of the congressionally mandated review, he did say the review has expanded from a focus on ballistic missile threats to all missile threats from cruise missiles to hypersonics.
The review will
from “what is that policy framework, what are the developments in the international security arena that have led us to make alterations to our approach, how are we approaching it in terms of working with friends and allies, looking at trades across the department for competing needs or competing ways to address some of the security concerns that we have,” he said, “and in some case they are not competing, they are complementary.”
Simply put, the review, he said, will contain the Pentagon’s policy intent going forward and its plans.
Rood added he was eager to push out the review “as soon as we can, believe me, on a personal level, I am, and hopefully we will get through the final hurdles in the department to do that very soon.”
