US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Yes LCS going for get a long stick

Navy: Most Offensive, Defensive Upgrades Surface Force Will Be Fielded by 2023

The next six years will bring numerous offensive and defensive capabilities to the surface fleet, culminating in Fiscal Year 2023 when the Flight III Arleigh Burke-class destroyer (DDG-51) reaches initial operational capability and the first frigate delivers to the fleet, the director of surface warfare (OPNAV N96) said last week.

Surface warfare advances in both the small and large surface combatant, that operate in the air, surface and undersea domains, will help move the Navy towards realizing its vision of distributed lethality, where every ship the Navy sails could pose a serious enough threat that an adversary couldn’t ignore any of them.

Upgunning the guided-missile cruisers and destroyers with new surface-to-surface weapons has been the most talked-about effort, Rear Adm. Ron Boxall told USNI News last week, but additional defensive capabilities are an important part of distributed lethality, he added. The Navy is busy looking at assured communications, unmanned systems and the Surface Electronic Warfare Improvement Program (SEWIP) to bolster the destroyers’ ability to protect themselves. The new SPY-6 Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) at the heart of the Flight III design, with 30-times the sensitivity as the legacy SPY-1D(V) radar, is, in a word, “incredible,” Boxall said.

Still, despite the early focus on destroyers, the Littoral Combat Ship and its eventual upgrade to the frigate design will play a huge role in distributed lethality. By 2030, more than half the at-sea surface force will be the LCS and frigate, Boxall said during a presentation at last week’s Surface Navy Association annual conference, and “you’ve got to make those as survivable and capable as possible. And integral to that is the over-the-horizon missile. If you don’t have an over-the-horizon missile on that ship, no one’s worrying about those ships. If you put a good missile on that ship, people are going to have to pay attention to it. There, ladies and gentlemen, is the crux of distributed lethality in surface warfare.”

USS Coronado (LCS-4) is currently deployed with the Harpoon over-the-horizon anti-ship missile in a bolt-on AN/SWG-1A missile launch control system, a configuration that was tested once over the summer at the Rim of the Pacific 2016 exercise but has not been used operationally during the ship’s deployment, Boxall said. He noted that the Harpoon has been around for a long time and the fleet has a good understanding of how it works – the missile is “a great capability, but we want more. We want longer ranges, we want more capability.”

The Navy missed a window of opportunity to test another over-the-horizon missile, the Kongsberg Naval Strike Missile, on USS Freedom (LCS-1) over the summer, before the ship had to go to the yard for a maintenance availability. Rather than wait for additional testing, though, Boxall said the Navy wanted to move ahead with the frigate request for proposals, which he said would be coming out “very soon” and would include capability upgrades including the OTH missile.

“If we have this missile out there and we can afford to do so, we will try to put it as many places as we can. Again, distributed lethality, the more shooters we have out there,” he said, adding that “anything we put on the frigate we will backfit to the LCS” and that ideally all 28 LCSs would get the OTH missile. He also noted the potential to bolt the SWG-1A launcher on cruisers and destroyers and add an additional missile capability to large surface combatants.

“I was a strike group commander and would have loved to have had, even the LCS with a Harpoon we have out there would be a huge improvement over what we have,” he added.
“Anything we continue to do to improve on that against the threats that are out there around the world right now is a step in the right direction.”

Adding more firepower onto the frigates will be supported by an enhanced air search radar, Lockheed Martin Vice President of Littoral Ships and Systems Joe North told USNI News last week at the SNA conference. Lockheed Martin’s frigate design includes the Airbus Defense and Space TRS-4D multi-mode naval radar, but North said the Navy will ultimately select the radar that will be included in the frigate, with the intention of delivering better sensitivity and range compared to the LCS radar.

North said the AN/SPQ-9 radar was the smallest available during LCS design and was still twice the cost of anything the Navy and its LCS builders wanted to use. Since that time, many international companies have been building small but capable radars, he said, noting that they have “followed what the Navy’s been doing and they’ve been putting a lot of upgrades into their systems.” With the upgraded radar, North said a frigate could provide protection for a five-LCS surface action group, for example, and coordinate with other ships in the area for regional protection.

Additionally, the introduction of the frigate – and the eventual introduction of the LCS anti-submarine warfare mission package – will bring great advances in the undersea domain. The SQQ-89A(V)15 and its multi-function towed array (MFTA) are installed on 35 percent of surface combatants today, including one ship in the Carrier Strike Group Boxall commanded, he said in his conference presentation, and it allows for communication between surface ships and submarines. The LCS anti-submarine warfare package and Lockheed Martin’s proposed frigate design also include a variable-depth sonar, which Boxall said is “what we’re using to put a sensor down below the layer where the submarines hang out. Imagine it in concert with another one above the layer from a MFTA ship … and be able to be communicated to other ships that can receive it out there: submarines, maybe aviation components, maybe sonobouys. So this is amazing stuff; when you look at those numbers and all the ships we’re going to have, LCS becomes critical to this.”

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
now I read
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Sen. John McCain issued a provocative and comprehensive alternative budget for the Pentagon on Monday,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Jerry Hendrix, a strategy and naval expert at the Center for New American Security, crunched the numbers from McCain’s White Paper and authored this analysis for our readers. Read on. The Editor.


The Senate Armed Services Committee’s new White Paper positions the committee as a leader in the Pentagon’s effort to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. The SASC offers a road map with key decision destinations for the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to follow as it pursues its goal of strengthening the nation’s military. The document is both broad and deep in its treatment of defense issues, ranging from the need for a new national grand defense strategy to recommendations on needed investments in cyber security.

Of particular interest and importance is the SASC’s advocacy for the U.S. to buy a high-low mix of weapons systems, a concept
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, as a means of advancing the force technologically for the high-end fight, while also buying cheaper systems in bulk to keep the force size up while addressing day-to-day threats.

In a dramatic move, McCain’s committee recommends
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
by an additional 18 ships over the 41 planned in the next five years. It would add additional submarines, destroyers, a new small surface combatant and a new, smaller, conventionally fueled aircraft carrier to the buy list. The initial plus ups are achieved by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
such as the Virginia-class fast attack submarines (going from two to four per year, for instance) and the Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, made by two shipbuilding companies in two yards in Maine and Mississippi.

The SASC’s openness to a new class of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
is exciting. While remaining committed to building the larger supercarriers to deter and defeat near-peer competitor nations in high-end combat, the SASC recommends that the Navy begin construction of a smaller carrier to more efficiently address daily power sea control, close air support and counterterrorism missions.

The White Paper recommends modifying the design of existing large-deck amphibious assault ships such as the America class, presumably adding catapult and arresting gear capabilities, in order to produce this new class of ship. The America, which weighs in at 44,000 tons presently, is very comparable in size to the USS Midway, which along with its sister ships the Franklin D. Roosevelt and Coral Sea, served as frontline carriers deploying with modern jet aircraft up to the mid-1990s. This avenue, which does not interrupt the construction of larger supercarriers, takes advantage
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to build warships in the 40,000-70,000 ton range and represents a swift and efficient path to get the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to meet all the stated carrier presence requirements of the regional combatant commanders around the world.

“Restoring American Power” also recommends stopping construction of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(LCS) after the 28th ship and shifting immediately to the construction of a new Small Surface Combatant, which for all practical purposes means a multi-mission frigate. The LCS has come under justified heavy criticism for its many material and design faults, but with the fleet falling to 274 ships, it has been difficult to forego the “bird in the hand” with a ship under production in favor of the “two in the bush” promise of a frigate to come.

The SASC report adequately splits the difference by sequencing the truncation of the LCS in step with the start of a new production line for the new frigate design. The Navy should heed this recommendation and should give due consideration of readily available designs,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, such as the National Security Cutter already in production or even the several robust foreign frigate designs that could be easily licensed for production in U.S. shipyards. The United States seems more than eager to sell our products, such as the Joint Strike Fighter, to our allies, but often seems all too hesitant to reciprocate when opportunities present themselves.

Sen. McCain’s White Paper does its due diligence with regard to the growing shortfall in the nation’s aviation fleet, as well as addressing the critical capabilities within that fleet with regard to both the number of aircraft available and the range at which they can operate.

While advocating continued procurement of the F-35, the SASC also recommends purchasing 300 low-cost
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
o make up critical shortfalls that affect the military service’s ability to meet low-end requirements. The White Paper also recommends that the Navy accelerate the development and IOC of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to extend the tactical range of the current carrier airwing. On top of that, the SASC recommends that the Navy rapidly develop a carrier-based unmanned aircraft to perform penetrating strike missions well outside the range and endurance of manned aircraft. It would be natural and wise, in my opinion, if the MQ-25 tanker now under development could be designed to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

“Restoring American Power” goes on to make specific recommendations regarding the Army and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(grow them prudently) as well as the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(modernizing all three legs). It tackles the thorny and complex issues of missile defense and the growing competition in space. It also takes head-on the disastrous impacts of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
on the nation’s defense and strongly advocates the repeal of this damaging law.

Lastly, it proposes additional research and development of new technologies that could rapidly aid the nation’s warfighters. In short, the paper will have influence because of it its specificity and should be in the immediate reading list of every analyst and policymaker who cares about our nation’s defense. It is clear that for those seeking to either reform or rebuild the Defense Department; they will find a ready partner in the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


By By Mike Stone, Reuters
Jan 18, 2017 at 9:31 pm | Print View
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Defense and Lockheed Martin Corp are close to deal for a contract worth almost $9 billion as negotiations are poised to bring the price per F-35 below $100 million for the first time, people familiar with the talks said Wednesday.

The F-35, the Pentagon’s costliest arms program, has drawn fire from U.S. President-elect Donald Trump who has made lowering prices for military equipment a pillar of his transition into office.

Talks are still ongoing for the tenth batch of stealthy fighter jets with a deal for 90 planes expected to be announced by the end of the month, three people said on condition of anonymity.

A Lockheed representative declined to comment and a representative for the fighter program said negotiations are ongoing.

The U.S. Defense Department expects to spend $391 billion in the coming decades to develop and buy 2,443 of the supersonic warplanes. Though the F-35 program has been criticized by Trump as too expensive, the price per jet has already been declining. Lockheed, the prime contractor, and its partners have been working on building a more cost-effective supply chain to fuel the production line in Fort Worth, Texas.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
B-2 bombers kill nearly 100 ISIS terrorists in Libya

A pair of B-2 "stealth" bombers blasted two ISIS training camps in Libya on Wednesday evening, dropping 108 precision-guided bombs and sending jihadists scattering -- many of whom were then "cleaned up" by drone-launched hellfire missiles, U.S. defense officials told Fox News

....

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Nov 25, 2016
"The assembly will be built on the composite warfare concept the Navy uses with its CSG." I'm ... puzzled PACFLT’s Swift: Amphib USS Wasp Will Deploy With Surface Action Group in 2017

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
related (actually one part overlaps :) the one about issues):
Next PAC SAG May Be Multinational; Vinson Strike Group To Continue ‘3rd Fleet Forward’ Ops
The Navy will take lessons learned from the 2016 deployment of a three-destroyer Pacific Fleet Surface Action Group (PAC SAG) that remained under U.S. 3rd Fleet command and stretch itself further, deploying a full carrier strike group under 3rd Fleet command and potentially forming a multinational “PAC SAG 2” this summer.

3rd Fleet Chief of Staff Capt. John Beaver said last week at the annual Surface Navy Association conference that last year’s deployment of USS Momsen (DDG-92), USS Spruance (DDG-111) and USS Decatur (DDG-73) was a good first step in learning how to project power outside the carrier strike group concept and in creating alternate command and control (C2) relationships.

“I would say that what we’re doing is we’re experimenting with different command and control arrangements and different force relationships to be able to get the maximum amount of lethality – so back to distributed lethality, we want to present a problem to a potential adversary beyond their ability to solve, so that’s what we’re experimenting with,” he told USNI News after moderating a panel discussion on the PAC SAG deployment. Distributed lethality is the Navy’s concept that a U.S. force that is geographically dispersed, but where every ship carries a lethal loadout of weapons, severely limits an adversary’s options.

“There is a hardware component to distributed lethality. There is also a [command and control] component,” Beaver said during the panel.

His panelists – the destroyer squadron commander and three destroyer commanding officers involved in last year’s PAC SAG – said the deployment went smoothly on their level, though they relied heavily on international partners for support. For example, without an oiler or supply ship attached to their group, as might be the case with an aircraft carrier, the destroyers often refueled from allies’ oilers, primarily from the Australian navy. They also were told at one point to order food and supplies from the Australian Navy logistics organization.

“It was a PACFLT initiative, the PACFLT supply officer wanted us as we were operating forward to be able to order from kangaroo meat, whatever, all those wonderful things that the Australian Navy has in their supply organization, Destroyer Squadron 31 commodore Capt. Charles Johnson said during the discussion.
“How do we order from them? That was one of the failures, but we got into that and the supply folks are figuring it out now.”

The ship COs said the refueling details were worked out at the DESRON level but that they refueled from a variety of nontraditional sources at sea and pierside and that they also tried out some nontraditional methods of saving fuel to put less strain on the situation.

The three officers – Cmdr. Garrett Miller, who commanded Decatur during the PAC SAG; Cmdr. Manny Hernandez, who commanded Spruance, and Momsen CO Cmdr. Jason Kipp – also described some harrowing casualty evacuation situations they faced without the help of an aircraft carrier’s medical capability. In one situation, a sailor from Decatur experienced a “significant medical emergency,” and being a ballistic missile defense destroyer the ship did not have any helicopters onboard. The ship had to call in a South Korean helicopter to bring the sailor to a hospital, since Momsen and Spruance and their helicopters were too far away and steaming to the closest port would take too long, Miller said in the panel discussion.

Though the idea for an international PAC SAG 2 did not come as a result of the first PAC SAG’s reliance on allies’ and partners’ support, these examples bring a new importance to the potential international collaboration this summer.

Beaver told USNI News that the PAC SAG participated in the Rim of the Pacific 2016 exercise in Hawaii over the summer, and “we had a tremendous response from our partners all around the Pacific Rim during the RIMPAC exercise, there was a lot of back and forth. So from a naval force level, we thought there was a great deal of interest in doing that (multinational PAC SAG 2). Now we understand that ultimately those are policy decisions, and so those navies have to go back and talk to their civilian leadership and get political direction. But as naval officers talking to other naval officers, they saw great possibilities, so we’ve returned those discussions to capitals and are waiting to hear back from the capitals on whether or not that’s doable.”

He noted during the panel that “there are a lot of issues associated with that that are echelons above the 3rd Fleet Commander” as well, and 3rd Fleet is awaiting instructions for how to move forward as well. A “small slice” of the Carl Vinson Carrier Strike Group, which deployed to the Western Pacific on Jan. 4, stayed behind and would serve as the U.S. contribution to the PAC SAG 2, Beaver said.

Additionally, Beaver said 3rd Fleet stood up a new flag-level organization – Commander, Task Force 30 – to command future “3rd Fleet Forward” deployments, where ships deploying from San Diego remain under 3rd Fleet operational control even after passing the International Date Line, where they’d normally move to 7th Fleet control. The 2016 PAC SAG was the first group to do this, and “It has been awesome because we’ve failed at every turn. It’s been such a rich learning environment. We’ve had communications issues, we’ve had integration issues… [Learning] that’s what this is all about,” U
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Rear Adm. Jim Kilby recently took command of CTF-30, and his first challenge will be overseeing the deployment of the Carl Vinson Carrier Strike Group. CTF-30 will fall between 3rd Fleet and the Carl Vinson CSG commander. Beaver said CTF-30 had existed previously but has not been used in any modern operations. Calling it a “revitalization” of the command, he told USNI News after his panel presentation that “what we’re doing is aligning 3rd Fleet operations with operations in 7th Fleet and 5th Fleet and 6th Fleet.”

Johnson, the DESRON commander, said the first PAC SAG was “at the CO level, at my staff level and below, seamless. There were no command and control questions. Obviously there were machinations above, and that’s great, and that’s what the learning process was for. But below at the operations, day to day events, there were no issues anywhere across the board.”

To address those higher-level operations, Beaver said in the panel discussion that “we had a command and control element that made the difference, they were focused on the SAG – it wasn’t an add-do responsibility for the 3rd Fleet N3 (operations) shop, it wasn’t an add-do responsibility for the deployed strike group, for the strike group (operations) shop. This was a dedicated commander unifying the efforts of three ships and communicating effectively up, down and across. … It was the ability to plan and it was the command and control – it’s that additional echelon that I think, on initial analysis, made it better. And so as CTF-30 stands up, we now have a flag staff doing this as opposed to a DESRON staff, and so we’re anticipating a commensurate improvement in that level as well.”

PACFLT, 7th Fleet and 3rd Fleet are now in discussions about how to allocate resources in the theater between the two numbered fleet’s operational assets, but he said the logistics professionals in CTF 33 under 3rd Fleet and CTF 73 under 7th Fleet collaborated well during the PAC SAG deployment and praised CTF 73 as “a national treasure in Singapore.”
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Wow, that is a Winchester!
check this bro:
Air Force Mulls Low-Cost Fighter Experiment
The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
intends to conduct an informal experiment of a potential light attack fighter aircraft the service could use in ongoing counterterrorism air campaigns, the service’s top general said Wednesday.

Chief of Staff Gen. David Goldfein said the Air Force is looking to programs such as Textron’s Scorpion to potentially provide an inexpensive fighter capable of performing close-air support missions.

“We’re right now just having this dialogue with industry partners,” Goldfein told reporters after speaking at an American Enterprise Institute event in Washington, D.C. “Making sure they know that we’re putting this on — dates, still to be determined. But probably around the springtime.”

Goldfein, saying there is no request for information at this time, did not elaborate on how the experiment would be conducted or what it would entail — whether it would be just a viewing of various industry light attack aircraft, simulation trials or flight demonstration.

His comments come days after Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
on how the Defense Department should move forward in military spending.

The former
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
pilot stressed that, while the service should sustain its
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
fighter fleet for close-air support, “the Air Force should procure 300 low-cost, light-attack fighters that would require minimal work to develop.”

“These aircraft could conduct counterterrorism operations, perform close-air support and other missions in permissive environments, and help to season pilots to mitigate the Air Force’s fighter pilot shortfall,”
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. His comments echo those of officials such as Lt. Gen. James “Mike” Holmes, the service’s deputy chief of staff for strategic plans and requirements, who recently said the aircraft could help dilute the fighter pilot shortage and gradually increase readiness.

McCain suggested the Air Force could procure “the first 200 of these aircraft by fiscal year 2022.”

Goldfein said it is important to note, “This isn’t a competition, it’s an experiment.”

“We’re going to do this experiment and see what’s out there, and I’m expecting many of the companies to come forward,” he said.

Brig. Gen. Edward Thomas, director of Air Force public affairs, said Goldfein — who hasn’t officially signed off on the experiment, dubbed OA-X — “believes it does make sense to look at opportunities to provide a … cheaper, attack-type aircraft that can do the close-air support mission, that other countries, allies, can fly also. And do this in a way that doesn’t require an
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
or an
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
over a permissive environment,” he said, mentioning Iraq and Afghanistan.

With the current budget, “I don’t believe there is anything specifically programmed for it right now,” Thomas said, noting the experiment is in its early stages and doesn’t have any funding attached.

The additional light attack aircraft — which would
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
— “would relieve the pressure on other aircraft, maintenance crews, [and] it would give us some turning space with our other combat platforms,” Thomas said.

In September,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that a less expensive aircraft could help the service alleviate the strain of maintaining its infrastructure, growing and training new pilot ranks, and adding more resources while simultaneously contributing to ongoing conflicts.

“We don’t think it would cost a lot of money, and it’s designed just to help us get our arms around [questions like], ‘What can you actually do? Does it actually contribute? Can it survive in different threat environments?’ ” Holmes said at the time.
source is DefenseTech
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
B-2 bombers kill nearly 100 ISIS terrorists in Libya

A pair of B-2 "stealth" bombers blasted two ISIS training camps in Libya on Wednesday evening, dropping 108 precision-guided bombs and sending jihadists scattering -- many of whom were then "cleaned up" by drone-launched hellfire missiles, U.S. defense officials told Fox News

....

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
In the mean time... great !

Libya.jpg
 
Top