US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
The moment the US ever feels it holds and can bring undeniable military superiority over China in China's frontyard, it will bring itself into a kinetic war with China. It's already created the psychological justifications and the hatred is properly brewed. It won't go to war unless it's convinced that it has a sure thing.

As Mark says in Peep Show, "You don't just declare war, Jeremy. You prime the press, you square things with the UN, you make up your reasons." Well they've already done enough of that (but no doubt will continue to do so) and they're only waiting for the technological superiority that makes a war a sure win. If what NEMESIS is capable of doing with any decent reliability, it's something PLAN and PLARF needs to quickly overcome and counter unless they don't mind fighting off a US invasion.
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
It may not be a copy of DF-17's HGV, the HGV under the cone is probably smaller and not designed to carry nuclear warheads. They're different and for different tasks. Probably the US equivalent to something like Zircon or other "DF-ZF" programs that include antiship HGVs which are smaller than the HGV on DF-17. Avangard is Russia's versatile boosted HGV of larger size.

The Americans have recently tested at least one small Zircon class HGV from a bomber. This land based one might be larger but not massive like the one on DF-17 which can't even be enclosed.
 

gelgoog

Brigadier
Registered Member
The DF-17 can carry a conventional warhead too and the performance parameters, both speed and range are about the same.
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
The DF-17 is mostly going to be carrying conventional warheads. It's just the vehicle itself is huge and HGVs don't need to be that large. It can carry a lot of things including more formidable electronics. But actually having thought about it, it's much more likely that the US land based HGV discussed in the article is indeed a larger HGV like Avangard or the vehicle on the DF-17. That's as opposed to being something much smaller like their air launched HGV that is inside the booster rocket of AGM-183.
 

SlothmanAllen

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


According to this Aviation Week report (will need to have a free account to view), the General Electrics XA100 "three three-stream adaptive combat engine" has completed its initial tests. The article mentions that, depending on how the efficiency gains of the engine are used, it can translate in to 30% greater range or 50% more loiter time. The engine is currently designed as a 45,000 lb thrust output, and can be dropped in to the F-35 with minimal changes.

Found an excellent image of the XA100 test article below:

XA100.jpg
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


According to this Aviation Week report (will need to have a free account to view), the General Electrics XA100 "three three-stream adaptive combat engine" has completed its initial tests. The article mentions that, depending on how the efficiency gains of the engine are used, it can translate in to 30% greater range or 50% more loiter time. The engine is currently designed as a 45,000 lb thrust output, and can be dropped in to the F-35 with minimal changes.

Found an excellent image of the XA100 test article below:

View attachment 72009

Lol that adds another additional two decades for China to catch up.
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
ADVENT has been nearly ready for a while. The US is at least as ready with ADVENT as China is with WS-15 it's F135 class engine. It's overall around 2 decades since ADVENT isn't quite ready for operation. I suspect WS-15 and ADVENT will be operational around the same timeframe give or take a year. If they didn't totally redo WS-15, it should have been operational already :(
 

voyager1

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


According to this Aviation Week report (will need to have a free account to view), the General Electrics XA100 "three three-stream adaptive combat engine" has completed its initial tests. The article mentions that, depending on how the efficiency gains of the engine are used, it can translate in to 30% greater range or 50% more loiter time. The engine is currently designed as a 45,000 lb thrust output, and can be dropped in to the F-35 with minimal changes.

Found an excellent image of the XA100 test article below:

View attachment 72009
Wow this is actually crazy.

Tha gap is even bigger between the US and China
 
Top