Ukrainian War Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.

Richard Santos

Captain
Registered Member
you can throw in 2 million troops it wont solve the problem when there is a strategic failure

when you have a water leak you first fix the leak then repair the damage

you dont repair the damage before stopping the water coming in because its a losing battle

same with the weapons pouring in like water from Western Ukraine, Norway alone sent 6,000 ATGM

Russia is fighting a losing battle with Ukraine awash with so many guerrilla weapons MANPADS + ATGM excellent for this type of warfare

the weapons shipments must be stopped as soon as they enter, once they are in they disperse and away no way to track them

Russia should have sent a army to secure the Western border
actually, pretty sure 2 million troops will do the trick, especially when the greatest failure is the want of maybe half a million troops.
 

Jingle Bells

Junior Member
Registered Member
you can throw in 2 million troops it wont solve the problem when there is a strategic failure

when you have a water leak you first fix the leak then repair the damage

you dont repair the damage before stopping the water coming in because its a losing battle

same with the weapons pouring in like water from Western Ukraine, Norway alone sent 6,000 ATGM

Russia is fighting a losing battle with Ukraine awash with so many guerrilla weapons MANPADS + ATGM excellent for this type of warfare

the weapons shipments must be stopped as soon as they enter, once they are in they disperse and away no way to track them

Russia should have sent a army to secure the Western border
What's worse is that the REAL guerrilla-warfare people's war hasn't really started yet.
 

Aegis21

Junior Member
Registered Member
They are keeping troops in reserve for other provocations like what we see with Azerbaijan or a rerun of Kazakhstan. Or worse, a direct intervention by NATO.
Ehh I don’t really agree with this.
1. Russian intervention in Azerbaijan is just unlikely. I don’t think they want to burn that bridge for Armenia.
2. Kazakhstan can be dealt with paramilitaries.
3. NATO intervention would basically mean nuclear retaliation, starting with the use of tactical weapons.
 

jvodan

Junior Member
Registered Member
The only explanation that I can make sense of on why he didn't send enough troops to encircle Kiev, is because its a diversion, to keep Ukrainian troops there to prevent them from sending reinforcement to the East.
And now Russia is pulling back from Kiev I wonder if they hope the Ukrainians send reinforcements east as more victims for the encirclement.
 

jvodan

Junior Member
Registered Member
It's President Elensky now....

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Kiev calls on world to ban ‘Z’​

Ukraine’s foreign minister says the letter symbolizes Russia’s military offensive
Kiev calls on world to ban ‘Z’

A column of Russian military equipment on the highway in the vicinity of Kherson. © Sputnik

Ukrainian Minister of Foreign Affairs Dmitry Kuleba has urged the global community to ban the Latin letter “Z” since, from Kiev’s point of view, it represents Russia’s military attack on the country.

“I call on all states to criminalize the use of the ‘Z’ symbol as a way to publicly support Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine,” Kuleba wrote on Twitter on Tuesday. He added that ‘Z’ means “Russian war crimes, bombed out cities, thousands of murdered Ukrainians” and said that “public support of this barbarism must be forbidden.”
Russian symbols with a 500-euro fine.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Meanwhile, according to the German newspaper Bild, the letter “Z” as a symbol of Russia’s military operation has already been banned in some regions of Germany, including Berlin, Bavaria, Lower Saxony, and North Rhine-Westphalia.
Realise that is going to hurt the USA more than they realize
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
What's worse is that the REAL guerrilla-warfare people's war hasn't really started yet.
The current occupation zones have near zero uprisings as they're ethnic Russian.

The best time for guerilla war is when the conventional war is still going on because weapons can move freely. Yet nothing in Donbass, Zhaphorizhzhia or Kherson Oblasts beyond peaceful picketing.
 

Abominable

Major
Registered Member
The current occupation zones have near zero uprisings as they're ethnic Russian.

The best time for guerilla war is when the conventional war is still going on because weapons can move freely. Yet nothing in Donbass, Zhaphorizhzhia or Kherson Oblasts beyond peaceful picketing.
Kherson is mainly ethnic Ukrainian, no uprising there even though they've brought in roubles and made the Russian language official.

There won't be any guerrilla warfare in the Ukraine even if the whole country is taken. Maybe some civil unrest in the west.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top