Kiev can be used as a threat in order to get the Ukrainians into the negotiating table. Do the occasional shelling but don't attack it yetKiev cannot be taken. Kiev is a diversion. Hell, not even Gulf monarchies can take Sanaa in Yemen after years.
Kiev can be used as a threat in order to get the Ukrainians into the negotiating table. Do the occasional shelling but don't attack it yetKiev cannot be taken. Kiev is a diversion. Hell, not even Gulf monarchies can take Sanaa in Yemen after years.
Kiev can be used as a threat in order to get the Ukrainians into the negotiating table. Do the occasional shelling but don't attack it yet
Sounds more like he's referring to the US?
Resolution 2573:
Attacking critical civilian infrastructure is a war crime, period. Your argument that just because the US gets away with it, everyone should do it, is psychotic. It's just as psychotic as the US war criminal leadership.
On top, your argument, as I already noted, doesn't even make sense. All you need to cripple a modern military is to destroy the military itself. Modern systems can't be cheaply and quickly mass produced like they were in the 1940s. So you are incorrect on every level.
"Unanimously adopting — “Protection of Objects Indispensable to the Survival of the Civilian Population” — the Council also strongly condemned the starvation of civilians as a method of warfare, which may constitute a war crime.
I was ATGM trained in Milan and then converted to Israeli Spike.
The way I see, those convoys were easily taken out of action. Ukraine got the timely intelligent on Russian movements and Russia didnt provide adequate air cover in the form of heli gunships.