Ukrainian War Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.

bolkonski

Just Hatched
Registered Member
The way Ukraine is begging for weapons is kinda embarrassing. They are begging nations for weapons like a panhandler in Time Square.
The way they ask for the airspace to be closed, and claim they can just start using F-16's effectively make me cringe, but they are obviously outgunned in this conflict, and are fighting for the future of their country. They know their success is completely dependent on outside help and they are rather lucky to have a president in office who has been so successful at getting all the help they realistically can. If you were fighting a war against an enemy you stand little chance against you wouldn't have a problem asking for this kind of help, it is different from begging America to directly get involved, like closing the airspace.
 

Jingle Bells

Junior Member
Registered Member
Russia is depriving Europe of the resources that ukraine provided like manpower /agriculture/ minerals at relatively minor cost once you quantify old and new. Russia is painting Europeans as hysterical and emotional with too much attachment to Ukraine. Turkey is not getting this love.
Except Europe and Russia are actually on the same boat, while the US is the big bad wolf out there, wanting to eat Europe for dinner.
time and energy will certainly be expanded but the prices of those resources also increased for exports.
Which is not a good thing for Russia. Russia's true family is Europe (Germany and France). Russian--FrancoGerman is one commonwealth of interest. While the USA is the financial apex-predator of the world. USA is literally the Wolves of Wall Street searching for capitals to consume all over the world. Now the USA is inflicting a "civil war" in the Russian--FrancoGerman commonwealth, while reaping the benefit of consuming EU's wealth. Russia as the resources and energy provider, certainly won't feel the pain nearly as fast as Europe will feel. But if Europe is on the route of long term decline, it won't be good for Russia as well.

Of course, Russia has little to lose, because Russia still has South Asia, East Asia and West Asia to engage with.

Soviet Industry was distributed but Russia made the Rail- Road-Airport network improved. so it is rather advantage that these things are built at far cheaper places without too much labor turnover.
Sure, except at a very minimal amount.

we already entering de-globalization. so there is not much market efficiency left. everything will get expensive and military industry cannot compete with commercial industry. Alot of Indian CEO that run global brands none of them has much military industry devlopment background.
Except de-globalization is initiated not by Russia, but by China and USA. Like I said in my last reply to you, the USSR's original more "distributed" way of planning and "landscaping" all over the country would actually be the trend of the future, in terms of physical layout of MIC and other industry. However, in order for Russia to quickly dash into the future and reap the benefit of USSR's "ahead-of-time" industrial landscape, Russia would have to invest heavily on implementation of 5G, AI and industry 4.0, etc, in her current infrastructure.

Russians are very good at research, innovation and management. But in order to realize their grand future, they will need A LOT of time and money invested. I mean an order of magnitude of more investments than what Russia is putting in now.

they certainly have investment in these fields.

Su-25SM3 value will be enhanced once Ka-52M/ UAV integration in real time. than it will be netcentric dynamic battlespace picking smaller mobile targets at considerable distances in simultaneous multishot engagement with AESA radar.
this very rigours training of pilots and machines.
A fully modernized Su-25 would be nice to see. We will look forward to see whether this war could let Su-25 prove its worth in modern and future warfare.

they have tested 22 Vikhr missiles. i think one side of current Ka-52 can take upto 12 missiles. there is another 100km cruise missile in tests.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Well, let's hope these projects are fruitful. Because cutting innovation is not without risks.
 

Abominable

Major
Registered Member
It'll be for the nazis who've barricaded themselves in underground bunkers/tunnels in the industrial sector. Doubt Russians have any chemical stocks, plus using chemical weapons is messy.

Flooding them with seawater is the Geneva convention approved option, but you may lose evidence.

Alternatively just hook up the exhausts of a few tanks to the ventilation system and any nazis who remain will be getting a reenactment of Dachau. Again Geneva convention approved, no hazardous chemicals, no further damage to infrastructure and can be reversed quite easily.
 

Abominable

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
If a country is forced into a default by physically blocking them from making payments, does it even count as a default? Russia is a resource rich country, it should have no problems paying back borrowed money. Unlike western countries, Russia has very little debt.

This war will affect their ability to access international markets no doubt, but I don't see what difference a forced default is going to make. Isn't this just giving Russia a chance not to pay off debts?
 

Abominable

Major
Registered Member
It doesn't matter what the UK claims about WMD, it matters what America says. They have as much say in this as Poland. So far America has twiced denied Ukrainian claims that WMD were used in this conflict. The first was the nuclear plant attack, the second was the chemical weapon attack on Abramovich (which was also championed by the UK).

It'll be interesting to see how America responds to this UK attempt to escalate. They've already stated that a chemical attack will result in a response "in kind", whatever that means. I think they'll deny it has happened.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top