The Snowden Affair

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: World News Thread & Breaking News!!

Maybe because their democracy grew out of the barrel of a gun, so when they export it that's the only delivery option available.
Oh Bravo Sierra, airsuperiority. That's just hogwash. Why take a simple saying, which was mis-quoted anyway because it is "Freedom is not Free," which means people have to sarcifice and sometimes fight and die to DEFEND it, not impose it...as I say, why take a simple saying and turn it into this political, anti-American kaka?

So, let me school you a bit on well known history. When then those colonists were faced with abject tyranny, forcing them to keep foreign soldiers in their own homes to help rule over them, being taxed into oblivion at the time, having their own children pressed into naval service for "his majesty," whether they wanted to or not, having no true representation for their grievances, etc., etc. they first tried for ten years to settle things through the King and the British Parliament...but were given no relief and instead were given even harsher treatment.

Then, when the King finally decided to confiscate their weapons, from a people living on the edge of a wilderness...they resisted and a war ensured.

So it was either fight, or be enslaved even more harshly.

The person(s) who entered "guns" into the equation at the time was the English King and his servants, so if you think as a result that the United States "created" democracy out of the barrel of a gun, you are free to believe what you want, but that belief has nothing to do with reality. They defended themselves.
 
Last edited:
Re: World News Thread & Breaking News!!

Oh Bravo Sierra, airsuperiority. That's just hogwash. Why take a simple saying, which was mis-quoted anyway because it is "Freedom is not Free," which means people have to sarcifice and sometimes fight and die to DEFEND it, not impose it...as I say, why take a simple saying and turn it into this political, anti-American kaka?

So, let me school you a bit on well known history. When then those colonists were faced with abject tyranny, forcing them to keep foreign soldiers in their own homes to help rule over them, being taxed into oblivion at the time, having their own children pressed into naval service for "his majesty," whether they wanted to or not, having no true representation for their grievances, etc., etc. they first tried for ten years to settle things through the King and the British Parliament...but were given no relief and instead were given even harsher treatment.

Then, when the King finally decided to confiscate their weapons, from a people living on the edge of a wilderness...they resisted and a war ensured.

So it was either fight, or be enslaved even more harshly.

The person(s) who entered "guns" into the equation at the time was the English King and his servants, so if you think as a result that the United States "created" democracy out of the barrel of a gun, you are free to believe what you want, but that belief has nothing to do with reality. They defended themselves.

Don't worry sir don't take it serious. It's just a mean tease I made.
 

MwRYum

Major
Re: World News Thread & Breaking News!!

Huh, that takes longer than expected...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Edward Snowden is a 'traitor' and possible spy for China – Dick Cheney

Former vice-president tells Fox he is 'suspicious because he went to China' as senior figures discuss surveillance leaks

Matt Williams in New York
guardian.co.uk, Sunday 16 June 2013 19.33 BST

Edward Snowden
NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden. Photograph: Handout/Reuters

Senior officials from the current and previous US administrations lined up on Sunday to defend the government sweep of phone and internet records and condemn the whistleblower who revealed the secret surveillance programmes.

The White House chief of staff, Denis McDonough, said President Barack Obama was of the mind that the no violations of privacy had taken place in regards to the data collections, the existence of which have been the subject of a series of Guardian reports.

Dick Cheney, vice-president under George W Bush and a key figure in the post-September 11 revamping of US national security, also defended the system. He told Fox News Sunday that it was needed to "gather intelligence on your enemies and stop the attack before it is launched". He went on to condemn the man behind the series of explosive leaks regarding. Having described Edward Snowden as a "traitor", Cheney went on to cast aspersions over the 29-year-old's decision to travel to Hong Kong, suggesting that he could be a spy for China.

"I'm suspicious because he went to China. That's not a place where you would ordinarily want to go if you are interested in freedom, liberty and so forth," Cheney said, adding: "It raises questions whether or not he had that kind of connection before he did this." Cheney suggested that Snowden could still be in possession of confidential data and that the Chinese would "probably be willing to provide immunity for him or sanctuary for him in exchange for what he presumably knows or doesn't know".

McDonough refused to speculate over Snowden's motives, but disputed claims that the former contract worker for the National Security Agency made to the Guardian concerning being able wiretap anyone, including the president.

"That's incorrect," the White House's most senior staffer told CBS's Face the Nation. He added that Obama did not believe that the surveillance system amounted to a government overreach. "We have to find the right balance of protecting our privacy – which is sacrosanct in the president's views – and protecting the country from the very real risk and threats that it faces."

McDonough's comments come a day after US intelligence chiefs wrote to Congress defending the legality and usefullness of the surveillance programmes that were first revealed by the Guardian and the Washington Post. The briefing document claimed that the monitoring of metadata had helped prevent potential terror attacks in the US and in more than 20 countries around the world. Some have complained that this claim is unproven.

Meanwhile, sceptics in Congress have complained that the surveillance programme does not come with sufficient checks to protect innocent individuals. Senator Mark Udall, a leading critic of the secret programme, said that collection of data does not have to be "all or nothing". He intends to put forward a bill that would limit the scope of what is allowed under the Patriot Act.

Udall told NBC's Meet the Press: "We owe it to the American people to have a debate in the open about the extent of this programme – you have a law that has been interpreted secretly by a secret court that then issues secret orders to generate a secret programme."

Udall added that the way the system operated at present wasn't "an American approach" to the problem of balancing privacy with threat reduction.

You know what that means: time for some "trade talks"....
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Re: World News Thread & Breaking News!!

This all about distraction. They're attacking Snowden to divert attention away from the fact, not about the US spying, but because they said they don't do what China does and yet they do. What makes it different? Because they say the US hasn't broken any laws of the US. Yeah China can say the same. If he was a Chinese spy, why would he come out publicly? It goes against anything of China's interests because now the US can change the way it spies that's reveal by Snowden. China would get a lot more if the US didn't know China had that information.
 

MwRYum

Major
Re: World News Thread & Breaking News!!

This all about distraction. They're attacking Snowden to divert attention away from the fact, not about the US spying, but because they said they don't do what China does and yet they do. What makes it different? Because they say the US hasn't broken any laws of the US. Yeah China can say the same. If he was a Chinese spy, why would he come out publicly? It goes against anything of China's interests because now the US can change the way it spies that's reveal by Snowden. China would get a lot more if the US didn't know China had that information.

Of course the US have to do something like that, that's "damage control" at its most basic form and fashion. But like I've pointed out before, where else can Snowden go that could give him the best balance of impact, credibility and safety? Anywhere else would've gift-wrap him to the US embassy within 24 hours, China or Russia or Iran is totally out of question, that leaves Hong Kong - still part of China but not exactly under China per se, other than the problem of living in one of the most costly city in the world, he could safely wait for the arms wrestling between Beijing and Washington to play it out, which won't end anytime soon...

To say the very least, Beijing won't want to give Snowden up so easily, unless the US offers something extremely juicy...
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
Re: World News Thread & Breaking News!!

Meanwhile the Chinese dissident Chen Guangcheng just got kicked out of NYU. I guess they ran out of money or motivation to keep him.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Re: World News Thread & Breaking News!!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



I like the part where he says it's a conspiracy by China to make him work for a living so he couldn't do any human rights work. I guess with NYU paying for everything while he was in the US made him spoiled. Yeah, I'm sure going to Disneyland with Christian Bale is all about human rights.
 

MwRYum

Major
Re: World News Thread & Breaking News!!

Original interview from Fox News...huh, that's hardly even surprising...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The father of NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden says he fears for his son's safety if he releases more information about his former employer. Speaking on Fox News, Lonnie Snowden says he would not have done what his son did. Snowden is in hiding in Hong Kong after revealing via the Guardian how the US spies on its citizens

On the other hand, several local newspapers published that by going through the legal process of extradition (if the US made the demand), with all the due process of hearings and appeals, it can drag on for 4-10 years...not only it'd go beyond Obama's term in office, the next problem will be how this guy going to survive in one of the most expensive city to live on this planet? A white guy in HK stands out like a bollocks on a bulldog, and he can't speak a word of Chinese means his zone of activity is ever more limited...and unlike Julian Assange got his expenses paid for by Ecuador, Snowden is on his own - unless he become somebody's patron...
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top