I must say the pattern of screws on the nozzle petals seem like it does correspond a bit more with M88 (first pic, Rafale), than M53 (second pic, Mirage 2000)
View attachment 151363
View attachment 151364
Either one would speak to the quality of China’s radars......
That's definitely M88. It would be interesting to know how Rafale was brought down. Was it an PL-15? or was it HQ9?
If data links are force multipliers, then multiple sets of incompatible data links are force divider. Indians have not or cannot learn the lessons of 2019 due to the inertia of arms procurement.I'm surprised by 0 Pakistani lost already. I'm biased towards Pakistan and I still couldn't believe it
J-20, J-16 and J-35, which is the 4th one? J-11? or Su-35?China has 4 fighters in service which are better than the J-10C and with two others flying but not yet in service.
Vs the IAF, It'll be a triple digit aerial victory with 0 Chinese losses.
If data links are force multipliers, then multiple sets of incompatible data links are force multipliers. Indians have not or cannot learn the lessons of 2019.
CETC's slogan in Chinese: Embrace the System, Triumph the Era. (note: not including Ayi in the middle)View attachment 151367
J-15T. Not sure about the Su-35, but I would say it's tied.J-20, J-16 and J-35, which is the 4th one? J-11? or Su-35?
The J-15T is definitely leagues above the Su-35.J-15T. not sure about the Su-35, but I would say it's tied.