Last edited:
So? Do you know what it was hit with? Was it torched after the soldiers evacuated? You could look up Roshel Senator in Ukraine. They fare no better. These are MRAP, not APC.
Me when a Mine Resistance Ambushed Protected vehicle does not fare against missiles or artillery strike (It's literally just designed to protect its passengers from mines and even then it will still absorb massive damage to not let its passenger get hurts):
I don’t think the Indians really seem to understand the concepts behind these MRAP armoured vehicles.
Hi,Yes, that is true. However, since the PLAAF operates a small batch of Su-35, the PLAAF is very familiar with the radar. Initially the PLAAF exercised frequently with the Su-35s, but concluded that its radar was prone to jamming by the J-10C/J-16 and found the Su-35 ineffective at operating in the heavily contested EM environment that PLAAF fighters were expected to operate in.
India would be better off funding its indigenous AESA development efforts and focusing on bringing the Uttam into production. Uttam + Astra Mk2 on MKI should prove to be a fairly capable and modern combo. Add in some networking/CEC, and India might end up with something close to a poor man's J-16.
The lesson that India should have learnt from the recent clash is that it needs to stop wasting money on foreign platforms and focus on building indigenous systems.
That's straight up not a Mengshi gen 3. Also mighty ironic for them to talk about quality. They are the same country that manage to lose 2 ships in dry dock, kill their own chief of army, and frequently crash modern fighter jets (let's not forget recent events)
Lol even the base Stryker or BTR-80A would struggle to resist RPG strikes without the add-on cage armours and I wondered why the Americans started developing V-hulled strykers in the first place. A bunch of villagers could not possibly do that much damage to the world's strongest army at the time right?