The Kashmir conflict 2025.

sabiothailand

New Member
Registered Member

Mt1701d

Junior Member
Registered Member
I don’t think the Indians really seem to understand the concepts behind these MRAP armoured vehicles.

The shell is intact, if we are talking IED, then it means the explosive and shrapnel have been mostly blocked, meaning the personnel inside likely survived the blast, meaning the vehicle did exactly what it was supposed to do, tanking the damage and making sure the people inside survived.

Otherwise if we talking artillery or RPG then most of these type of MRAP won’t survive either way.
 

defenceman

Junior Member
Registered Member
Yes, that is true. However, since the PLAAF operates a small batch of Su-35, the PLAAF is very familiar with the radar. Initially the PLAAF exercised frequently with the Su-35s, but concluded that its radar was prone to jamming by the J-10C/J-16 and found the Su-35 ineffective at operating in the heavily contested EM environment that PLAAF fighters were expected to operate in.

India would be better off funding its indigenous AESA development efforts and focusing on bringing the Uttam into production. Uttam + Astra Mk2 on MKI should prove to be a fairly capable and modern combo. Add in some networking/CEC, and India might end up with something close to a poor man's J-16.

The lesson that India should have learnt from the recent clash is that it needs to stop wasting money on foreign platforms and focus on building indigenous systems.
Hi,
your analysis si perfect for a airforce who want to astride, in case of india utam Astra, long way to go
for india better is to get make for them, so as I mentioned in one of my post either Rafale F4/5 configuration
or some Russian help, though even Russian are no so good in modern warfare but much better then Indians
so something plug and p,any kind of situation for india is either Rafale upgrading which I think eventually we
will see very soon in new Rafales order my Indian Navy or May be 18/24 MKI send back to Russia for
wingtips AESA pods with more robust radar like su35 to fire R37
thank you
 

KampfAlwin

Senior Member
Registered Member
Last edited:

Hitomi

Junior Member
Registered Member
Lol even the base Stryker or BTR-80A would struggle to resist RPG strikes without the add-on cage armours and I wondered why the Americans started developing V-hulled strykers in the first place. A bunch of villagers could not possibly do that much damage to the world's strongest army at the time right?
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Lol even the base Stryker or BTR-80A would struggle to resist RPG strikes without the add-on cage armours and I wondered why the Americans started developing V-hulled strykers in the first place. A bunch of villagers could not possibly do that much damage to the world's strongest army at the time right?

Don’t worry, ever since Trump negotiated cease fire Jai Hinds have been calling American gear junk too and have been gloating about how Houthis almost shot down F-35/F-16 and caused attrition of two F-18s.
 

Observer1

New Member
Registered Member
IAF Rafale kill mark on one of PAF's J10-C

1000020634.jpg


French dude is coping hard spamming this everywhere, read this:

"J-10 has very low result , launching dozens missiles PL-15 vs rafales bombing pakistan's air bases. There is only 1 Rafale damaged (rear empenage BS001 cut), no longer maneuverable, Indian pilot forced to eject. = very low result vs Rafale Spectra countermeasures."

"J-10 did almost nothing, it launched a missile and returned to hide in its safety zone. Pakistan used an Awacs to direct their missile PL-15 opening their radar very late near the Rafale. Rafale has good countermeasures Spectra avoiding dozens missiles with may be 1 rafale lost"

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top