The Kashmir conflict 2025.

C

caudaceus

Senior Member
Registered Member
Joliex10 said:
Who in france confirmed it? Not Dassault or any government officials. Just said some french anonymous person. The CNN article is not enough concrete evidence for anything. Remember when CNN also made up a story of a chinese submarine sinking in Wuhan with no proof.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Lol. I'm not even trying and so many are already crying for mods.

Now imagine how much i would wreck Indians if i actually have evidence of their rafale getting shot down/crashed.
Click to expand...
I mean CNN itself as an organization is rather immaterial, it's the French commentary that is decisive, as them being the original developer of Rafale.
Not only that, we also found multiple photographic evidence of various Rafale components like the Engine and tail. So the French commentary is just the cherry on top.

Honestly the way they detract the photos is rather clumsy. Especially just claiming it's just an old photo.
Please, we even get an update whenever Mig-21 or Mirage-2k are destroyed during drills from time to time, but we never heard about a Rafale going down before?
 
Randomuser

Randomuser

Senior Member
Registered Member
Observer1 said:
According to popular Indian thought: Chinese are abusing their own technology and deeply sad because it was supposedly defeated in Pakistan by India.

Can someone do a psychoanalysis on the Jay Hindos? How are they able to manufacture an entirely different reality and all collectively believe in it?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...
You how deluded NAFO was during Ukraine?

Its a lot worse for Jai Hinds. Honestly the amount of dumb takes they put on twitter will crash SDF servers from sheer size.

So I recommend not caring unless its someone like an important figure or person in authority doing it. There are 1.4B indians so you can expect a lot of them putting dumb takes for the world to see. They don't matter. Its not worth your time. If its an Indian general coping hard, now thats worth seeing.
 
C

caudaceus

Senior Member
Registered Member
sequ

sequ

Major
Registered Member
bsdnf said:
SECOND PL-15E's Ku-band AESA seeker antenna? Or HQ-16?

Relatively intact, But it was manufactured 10 years ago:oops:

Edit: It is not the PL-15E's seeker antenna, date doesn't match and obviously larger than that. Considering the production date, it should be the HQ-16
View attachment 151601View attachment 151602
Click to expand...
10 year old export product. Imagine what they have right now.

*Gotta love the Hong Kong English writing
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top