Russian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
It's clear as day to anyone with comprehension skills and ISN'T biased, that Jeff in this post WAS indeed referring to China as one of the "potentially aggressor nations' aircraft carriers" which the countries buying F-35B is aiming to counter. What is so hard to get about this simple point. I'm not talking about anything else literally. Just that this exists and using the word aggressor is also indeed a reflection of personal political position which is also FINE. But it's also okay to point that out.
 
D

Deleted member 13312

Guest
That's really only clear to someone who is thinks that Russia and China are so self important as to warrant immediately allegation and I notice how you conveniently left out Iran when you referred to "aircraft carriers" because Iran does not have any, yet the F-35B is the one that is supposed to counter that ?

It's interesting to see how you methodically shift from the F-35 to the F-35B, while it is true that Jeff focused mostly on the F-35B the main gist of his post is focused on the fact that nations bought the F-35 because of it's perceived value. That is something that you or Anthv has insofar fail to point out.
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
lol pathetic. Why have you moved to putting words into Jeff's mouth now?

Again my posts speak for themselves. You said you couldn't find something, I help you out. A thanks isn't expected from you but distracting and making a whole bunch of irrelevant noise and making a whole bunch of accusations against a person uninvolved with this discussion is beyond pathetic. Sad really.

The only thing I've pointed out is your none-attempt or inability to find a certain word that WAS used as opposed to your "meh meh wah wah I can't find where that was said" post and I used F-35B because that's what Jeff was writing about. Have you noticed I was not involved in this discussion so no there is no me and anthl. Just antl and Jeff and your hopeless comprehension skills.
 
D

Deleted member 13312

Guest
lol pathetic. Why have you moved to putting words into Jeff's mouth now?

Again my posts speak for themselves. You said you couldn't find something, I help you out. A thanks isn't expected from you but distracting and making a whole bunch of irrelevant noise and making a whole bunch of accusations against a person uninvolved with this discussion is beyond pathetic. Sad really.

The only thing I've pointed out is your none-attempt or inability to find a certain word that WAS used as opposed to your "meh meh wah wah I can't find where that was said" post and I used F-35B because that's what Jeff was writing about. Have you noticed I was not involved in this discussion so no there is no me and anthl. Just antl and Jeff and your hopeless comprehension skills.
Nice way to sugar coat a bare attempt of cherry picking placing assumptions as facts where there aren't any.
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
Nice way to sugar coat a bare attempt of cherry picking placing assumptions as facts where there aren't any.

lol way to go covering your failure to find the facts of this discussion. You claimed you could not find the "aggressor" description and now you try muddle it up. Well YOU said you couldn't find it anywhere and I pointed out where. A thanks would be nice but well above what you are able to offer.
 
D

Deleted member 13312

Guest
lol way to go covering your failure to find the facts of this discussion. You claimed you could not find the "aggressor" description and now you try muddle it up. Well YOU said you couldn't find it anywhere and I pointed out where. A thanks would be nice but well above what you are able to offer.
No what you brought up are words which existed nowhere in Jeff's post and are based on your assumptions.
 
Feb 11, 2017
Nov 29, 2016

and now a source told Интерфакс "Zircon" will be test-fired off of an unidentified ship in spring of 2017, and sources told Интерфакс the range of "Zircon" is about 500 km, speed in Mach five to six range:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I guess readers are expected to say: Wow
LOL!
well now ТАСС said
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
had fired one "Zircon" during a test in January of this year:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Mar 1, 2018
new heavyweight (replacing
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) torp ("Ichthyosaurus" LOL) to cost about 100m Rubles:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
pretty advanced if it's true
and it seems it's passed state (government) tests recently:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(the name of a torp is not given in the press-relase
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
)
 

XavNN

Junior Member
Registered Member
Project 955A Borei-A SSBN to Reinforce Russian Navy Pacific Fleet
Project-955A-Borei-A-SSBN-to-Reinforce-Russian-Navy-Pacific-Fleet-770x410.jpg

Borei-A-class SSBN of project 955A will operate in the Far East. Five out of eight submarines will serve in the Pacific fleet. The Russian Navy is restoring the Far Eastern nuclear arsenal which was nearly lost thirty years ago.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top