Wearing vests backwards, overall improper usage of weaponry, etc.Like what exactly?
Wearing vests backwards, overall improper usage of weaponry, etc.Like what exactly?
For every one of those, 90% of everyone else is doing it correctly, but you people love amplifying any mistakes made by the minority onto the whole branch. This also applies to every time the PLA does something experimental or new; some of you people act as if it were standard practice.Wearing vests backwards, overall improper usage of weaponry, etc.
Something in China: ewwwwwwwFor every one of those, 90% of everyone else is doing it correctly, but you people love amplifying any mistakes made by the minority onto the whole branch. This also applies to every time the PLA does something experimental or new; some of you people act as if it were standard practice.
Even worse, somehow you found a way to complain about giving troops suppressors with that snide side comment. I don't think the PLAGF are the ridiculous ones here.
That logic only applies Recon or Special Operations where stealth matters. In an assault it dosen't make any sense aswell as for patrols where detection matters. Plus I can imagine the logistical and maintance nightmare.Suppressors are most important in regular combat in helping to minimise the fireball and dust signature of firing to make it much harder for opfor to pinpoint shooters for effective return fire and suppression. This is a valuable lesson learnt in Ukraine where both sides’ soldiers prioritise getting suppressors over every other attachment including optics. That’s why you see lots of AKs with iron sights and cans.
And you really show your own lack of knowledge and bias against the PLA with that silly and utterly unwarranted dig about clear schedule.
no, this has absolutely been proved out in Ukraine, both sides are throwing as many suppressors on as possible to try to reduce the units signatures. The US is sending millions of suppressors to Ukraine for just this purpose.That logic only applies Recon or Special Operations where stealth matters. In an assault it dosen't make any sense aswell as for patrols where detection matters. Plus I can imagine the logistical and maintance nightmare.
Ok, coming from someone who larps and collect milgear, obtaining PLA stuff is kinda average, if you know who to talk to and have the means to get it out of China its very easy because low level corruptions like that just exists. Just like you can with US and Russian stuff (although US and Russia are kinda messy, ITAR with the US and Russia with Ukraine, there was a brief moment in time where the war got so desperate they were confiscating anything camo-related. That's how stupid it got)Fools cannot conceive of things they have never seen. In your capitalist world, where Russian and American troops engage in the illicit trade of military supplies, you presumptuously assume that the People's Liberation Army and the People's Armed Police Forces of China would do the same. In the People's Republic of China, enlisting in the military is an honorable and noble calling. Those who join do so not for high salaries. Your nonsense is as ridiculous as a clown's antics in my eyes.
You are thinking of movies. Suppressors do not transform soldiers’ rifles into suppressed pistols like you see in John Wick movies (their crap made me cringe). They reduce the sound signature enough to allow the user to communicate with others and to prevent the enemy from rapidly pinpointing their location. You need specialized ammo and a suppressor to achieve what you are thinking of at minimum.That logic only applies Recon or Special Operations where stealth matters. In an assault it dosen't make any sense aswell as for patrols where detection matters. Plus I can imagine the logistical and maintance nightmare.
No? Suppressors hardly add that much wear and cost to a kit but it's astronomically better when it comes to reducing a soldier's signature, every modern military with decent funding should be handing out as many Suppressors as possible, especially since the VQX191 is already a flow through design, I don't get how is it even possible to frame handing out suppressors as anything but a straight improvement. It's really fucking bizarre how the Ukraine conflict demonstrated this for years and somehow people still need this explained to them.That logic only applies Recon or Special Operations where stealth matters. In an assault it dosen't make any sense aswell as for patrols where detection matters. Plus I can imagine the logistical and maintance nightmare.
Just double up on ear protection, earplugs + earmuffs. Great for reducing concussion from rifles with shorter barrels though.Suppressors are almost a necessity shooting indoors where barrels are next to each other's ears.