PRC/PLAN Laser and Rail Gun Development Thread

Hyper

Junior Member
Registered Member
Does anyone have access to the paper(s) from which these illustrations are taken? Thanks in advance.


52723218297_5e1747c748_b.jpg
52724219783_9f801dc0ae_b.jpg
52724151540_84d4cd1925_b.jpg
52724151520_cdf23173b5_h.jpg
52724151530_abfe6726d7_b.jpg
second photo looks similar to BAE systems HVP.
 

kurutoga

Junior Member
Registered Member
second photo looks similar to BAE systems HVP.
There was a report of CIA hired spy stealing Chinese railgun design. If I remember it correctly, it was in year 2014 or 2016. If you search hard enough you can find its video documentary on youtube. It was a Chinese defense engineer published a paper in a English language journal then was bribed by the American spy to steal the documents successfully. Then, the documentary video blamed US of cloning the same design.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
second photo looks similar to BAE systems HVP.
There was a report of CIA hired spy stealing Chinese railgun design. If I remember it correctly, it was in year 2014 or 2016. If you search hard enough you can find its video documentary on youtube. It was a Chinese defense engineer published a paper in a English language journal then was bribed by the American spy to steal the documents successfully. Then, the documentary video blamed US of cloning the same design.

I think you're both assuming that there is any manner in which a railgun munition with sabot can be designed.

There's a reason with most APFSDS from tanks have a similar geometry.
 

hundredyears

New Member
Registered Member
Does anyone have access to the paper(s) from which these illustrations are taken? Thanks in advance.


52723218297_5e1747c748_b.jpg
52724219783_9f801dc0ae_b.jpg
52724151540_84d4cd1925_b.jpg
52724151520_cdf23173b5_h.jpg
52724151530_abfe6726d7_b.jpg

This is apparently 5 different
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
for each of these figures, all from institute 713.

It should be noted the amount of published literature on this topic ("电磁轨道炮"/“railgun") from Chinese authors is quite significant (~300 articles, ~20/year since 2012) considering its relative novelty. Potentially indicative of progresses or at least efforts made towards the field.

Figure for number of papers published per year on "railgun":
1678338795657.png
As a notional comparison, research articles for traditional "舰炮"/"naval gun" systems average around 3 articles per year. Although this likely reflects some research being classified due to relevant systems being in service.
 

by78

General
This is apparently 5 different
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
for each of these figures, all from institute 713.

It should be noted the amount of published literature on this topic ("电磁轨道炮"/“railgun") from Chinese authors is quite significant (~300 articles, ~20/year since 2012) considering its relative novelty. Potentially indicative of progresses or at least efforts made towards the field.

Figure for number of papers published per year on "railgun":
View attachment 108732
As a notional comparison, research articles for traditional "舰炮"/"naval gun" systems average around 3 articles per year. Although this likely reflects some research being classified due to relevant systems being in service.

Oh boy, am I glad to have you here. Thank you again!
 

kurutoga

Junior Member
Registered Member
There was recent reports that Chinese railgun tests showed, it can penetrate 80mm steel plates in 100km distance. Not sure if it is fake or real news. Anyone has the source?
 

kriss

Junior Member
Registered Member
There gotta be something wrong with this report. It's already weird enough they talk about penetrating 80mm steel as it's some kind of accomplishment. Then they say frontal armor of MBT would also translate roughly to 80mm. I don't think we can believe any number come out of this article.
 
Top