PLAN Carrier Strike Group and Airwing

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread

No its not that simple. Shipdesigning is not an easy task, exspecially when designing warships. Warships with huge enough to field an airstirp ontop...

China has been in the warshipbuilding industry since the 1950's but had it's first three decades of showing basicly no progress at all. They were tied to redesing already obcolent soviet warship models and had huge proplems in the very basics of technology not to mention about the workmanship and quality issues. This was ofcourse becouse of the illfavorably conditions. Non existing industrial base and shipbuilding traditions, Breakup with the "big-brother", genious marvels of "great leap forwards" and "cultural revolution"...they were the biggest overall reaosn for the backwardness of the chinese development in almoust all areas. Only in late 80's and early 90's was there any progress. This progress emerged as it would do with in reasonable limits. It was a huge leap to developt the first indegenious destroyer design and it was done so basicly with blind-folden. These babysteps were shaky and unbalanced but still they headed forwards.

Now after 17 years china is still taking those steps (unlike many of you may think). The first indegenious destroyer, Luhu class had it's illfated and ill-logical follower from the Luhai class (which history I explained in the 167 mod thread) and now there's the seccond generation luhu's (which was actually more viable design than its intial follower) are being fielded but all sighs points that China is not so happy with the results.

The babysteps continue, the PLAN has emerged to the "toddler-age" and is now eagerly trying everything new. Also it now seems that its having succes with the 054A and is finally having relatively modern major surface combatant into serial production.

...But to design and build a 93,000 ton aircraft carrier? Its as realistic given to the current state of chinese cababilites as it is to see a Polish Sthealt fighter emerging to challenge the f-22...

China has no experience of building warships of over 10,000 tons. To design a small VSTOL carrier of just above that tonnage would be enourmous and almoust impossiple task to the chinese builders. Aircraft carriers aren't container ships. They are not oil tankers, or any other civilian sector "big ships". Aircraft carriers are the biggest and most complicated warships existing today and to have one that is actually workable ship, you need to know exactly what you are doing. How on earht do you expect chinese to know what it takes to build 93,000 ton supercarrier? Yeas they have studied Varyag...The last offsping of another noob country's effort to do exactly the same as Chinese are doing now. And suprise, suprise they didn't do that well. Soviets carriers were from the shipdesign point of wiev completely unsuccesfull. Moskvas and Kievs had poor seakeeping and handeling proplems and with the politicans screwing the decision making, the air-capabilities were as horrible. Varyag (which followed the hulldesign from the Kiev class) is 60,000 ton carrier with practical aviation cababilites of that of 27,000 ton Centaurio class. Only difference is that at least Centaurios had Catabults before the VSTOL hype...
Studying Varyag is only good if you wish to point out what you shouldn't do. But thats all what China has now and they should make all the efforts of it. But it's not going to help them to make this supercarrier that this "article" promises...

China doesen't need 80 years, but it still needs years....First to get balanced and viable shipdevelopment line with the normal warshisp, then get the Varyag finished and only after then will they be ready for the next challenge which is to developt an indegenious carriers but those will be far more realistic than this mentioned above. It takes decades at least. My obinion and guess is that we see one emerging to the building phase around 2020...


But untill then, lets just wait and get Varyag lauched first, then start dreaming with supercarriers exiding all current designs.
 

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread

No its not that simple. Shipdesigning is not an easy task, exspecially when designing warships. Warships with huge enough to field an airstirp ontop...

China has been in the warshipbuilding industry since the 1950's but had it's first three decades of showing basicly no progress at all. They were tied to redesing already obcolent soviet warship models and had huge proplems in the very basics of technology not to mention about the workmanship and quality issues. This was ofcourse becouse of the illfavorably conditions. Non existing industrial base and shipbuilding traditions, Breakup with the "big-brother", genious marvels of "great leap forwards" and "cultural revolution"...they were the biggest overall reaosn for the backwardness of the chinese development in almoust all areas. Only in late 80's and early 90's was there any progress. This progress emerged as it would do with in reasonable limits. It was a huge leap to developt the first indegenious destroyer design and it was done so basicly with blind-folden. These babysteps were shaky and unbalanced but still they headed forwards.

Now after 17 years china is still taking those steps (unlike many of you may think). The first indegenious destroyer, Luhu class had it's illfated and ill-logical follower from the Luhai class (which history I explained in the 167 mod thread) and now there's the seccond generation luhu's (which was actually more viable design than its intial follower) are being fielded but all sighs points that China is not so happy with the results.

The babysteps continue, the PLAN has emerged to the "toddler-age" and is now eagerly trying everything new. Also it now seems that its having succes with the 054A and is finally having relatively modern major surface combatant into serial production.

...But to design and build a 93,000 ton aircraft carrier? Its as realistic given to the current state of chinese cababilites as it is to see a Polish Sthealt fighter emerging to challenge the f-22...

China has no experience of building warships of over 10,000 tons. To design a small VSTOL carrier of just above that tonnage would be enourmous and almoust impossiple task to the chinese builders. Aircraft carriers aren't container ships. They are not oil tankers, or any other civilian sector "big ships". Aircraft carriers are the biggest and most complicated warships existing today and to have one that is actually workable ship, you need to know exactly what you are doing. How on earht do you expect chinese to know what it takes to build 93,000 ton supercarrier? Yeas they have studied Varyag...The last offsping of another noob country's effort to do exactly the same as Chinese are doing now. And suprise, suprise they didn't do that well. Soviets carriers were from the shipdesign point of wiev completely unsuccesfull. Moskvas and Kievs had poor seakeeping and handeling proplems and with the politicans screwing the decision making, the air-capabilities were as horrible. Varyag (which followed the hulldesign from the Kiev class) is 60,000 ton carrier with practical aviation cababilites of that of 27,000 ton Centaurio class. Only difference is that at least Centaurios had Catabults before the VSTOL hype...
Studying Varyag is only good if you wish to point out what you shouldn't do. But thats all what China has now and they should make all the efforts of it. But it's not going to help them to make this supercarrier that this "article" promises...

China doesen't need 80 years, but it still needs years....First to get balanced and viable shipdevelopment line with the normal warshisp, then get the Varyag finished and only after then will they be ready for the next challenge which is to developt an indegenious carriers but those will be far more realistic than this mentioned above. It takes decades at least. My obinion and guess is that we see one emerging to the building phase around 2020...


But untill then, lets just wait and get Varyag lauched first, then start dreaming with supercarriers exiding all current designs.
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread

No its not that simple. Shipdesigning is not an easy task, exspecially when designing warships. Warships with huge enough to field an airstirp ontop...

China has been in the warshipbuilding industry since the 1950's but had it's first three decades of showing basicly no progress at all. They were tied to redesing already obcolent soviet warship models and had huge proplems in the very basics of technology not to mention about the workmanship and quality issues. This was ofcourse becouse of the illfavorably conditions. Non existing industrial base and shipbuilding traditions, Breakup with the "big-brother", genious marvels of "great leap forwards" and "cultural revolution"...they were the biggest overall reaosn for the backwardness of the chinese development in almoust all areas. Only in late 80's and early 90's was there any progress. This progress emerged as it would do with in reasonable limits. It was a huge leap to developt the first indegenious destroyer design and it was done so basicly with blind-folden. These babysteps were shaky and unbalanced but still they headed forwards.

I don't see what cultural revolution got to do with building a carrier Yes China lost years in technical development during the cultural revolution But the lack of progress in military progress has more to do with funding Don't forget that military funding hardly increase at all during the 70's and 80's In fact it was decreases for most of those years To compare the technical level of China in 70's and now Doesn't do justice at all As the previous poster mention China is the 3rd largest ship building country after Korea and Japan And it built sophisticated ship like LNG carrier and Supertanker

.
China has no experience of building warships of over 10,000 tons. To design a small VSTOL carrier of just above that tonnage would be enourmous and almoust impossiple task to the chinese builders. Aircraft carriers aren't container ships. They are not oil tankers, or any other civilian sector "big ships". Aircraft carriers are the biggest and most complicated warships existing today and to have one that is actually workable ship, you need to know exactly what you are doing. How on earht do you expect chinese to know what it takes to build 93,000 ton supercarrier? Yeas they have studied Varyag...The last offsping of another noob country's effort to do exactly the same as Chinese are doing now. And suprise, suprise they didn't do that well. Soviets carriers were from the shipdesign point of wiev completely unsuccesfull. Moskvas and Kievs had poor seakeeping and handeling proplems and with the politicans screwing the decision making, the air-capabilities were as horrible. Varyag (which followed the hulldesign from the Kiev class) is 60,000 ton carrier with practical aviation cababilites of that of 27,000 ton Centaurio class. Only difference is that at least Centaurios had Catabults before the VSTOL hype...
Studying Varyag is only good if you wish to point out what you shouldn't do. But thats all what China has now and they should make all the efforts of it. But it's not going to help them to make this supercarrier that this "article" promises...

I believe your prejudice got the better of yourself because russia failed doesn't mean China has to fail too It has no correlation at all. Anyway China has better Industrial base except weapon development It is way better than Russia at it's height Shipping company doesn't buy shoddy product

China doesen't need 80 years, but it still needs years....First to get balanced and viable shipdevelopment line with the normal warshisp, then get the Varyag finished and only after then will they be ready for the next challenge which is to developt an indegenious carriers but those will be far more realistic than this mentioned above. It takes decades at least. My obinion and guess is that we see one emerging to the building phase around 2020...

Well let see who is right
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread

No its not that simple. Shipdesigning is not an easy task, exspecially when designing warships. Warships with huge enough to field an airstirp ontop...

China has been in the warshipbuilding industry since the 1950's but had it's first three decades of showing basicly no progress at all. They were tied to redesing already obcolent soviet warship models and had huge proplems in the very basics of technology not to mention about the workmanship and quality issues. This was ofcourse becouse of the illfavorably conditions. Non existing industrial base and shipbuilding traditions, Breakup with the "big-brother", genious marvels of "great leap forwards" and "cultural revolution"...they were the biggest overall reaosn for the backwardness of the chinese development in almoust all areas. Only in late 80's and early 90's was there any progress. This progress emerged as it would do with in reasonable limits. It was a huge leap to developt the first indegenious destroyer design and it was done so basicly with blind-folden. These babysteps were shaky and unbalanced but still they headed forwards.

I don't see what cultural revolution got to do with building a carrier Yes China lost years in technical development during the cultural revolution But the lack of progress in military progress has more to do with funding Don't forget that military funding hardly increase at all during the 70's and 80's In fact it was decreases for most of those years To compare the technical level of China in 70's and now Doesn't do justice at all As the previous poster mention China is the 3rd largest ship building country after Korea and Japan And it built sophisticated ship like LNG carrier and Supertanker

.
China has no experience of building warships of over 10,000 tons. To design a small VSTOL carrier of just above that tonnage would be enourmous and almoust impossiple task to the chinese builders. Aircraft carriers aren't container ships. They are not oil tankers, or any other civilian sector "big ships". Aircraft carriers are the biggest and most complicated warships existing today and to have one that is actually workable ship, you need to know exactly what you are doing. How on earht do you expect chinese to know what it takes to build 93,000 ton supercarrier? Yeas they have studied Varyag...The last offsping of another noob country's effort to do exactly the same as Chinese are doing now. And suprise, suprise they didn't do that well. Soviets carriers were from the shipdesign point of wiev completely unsuccesfull. Moskvas and Kievs had poor seakeeping and handeling proplems and with the politicans screwing the decision making, the air-capabilities were as horrible. Varyag (which followed the hulldesign from the Kiev class) is 60,000 ton carrier with practical aviation cababilites of that of 27,000 ton Centaurio class. Only difference is that at least Centaurios had Catabults before the VSTOL hype...
Studying Varyag is only good if you wish to point out what you shouldn't do. But thats all what China has now and they should make all the efforts of it. But it's not going to help them to make this supercarrier that this "article" promises...

I believe your prejudice got the better of yourself because russia failed doesn't mean China has to fail too It has no correlation at all. Anyway China has better Industrial base except weapon development It is way better than Russia at it's height Shipping company doesn't buy shoddy product

China doesen't need 80 years, but it still needs years....First to get balanced and viable shipdevelopment line with the normal warshisp, then get the Varyag finished and only after then will they be ready for the next challenge which is to developt an indegenious carriers but those will be far more realistic than this mentioned above. It takes decades at least. My obinion and guess is that we see one emerging to the building phase around 2020...

Well let see who is right
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread

No its not that simple. Shipdesigning is not an easy task, exspecially when designing warships. Warships with huge enough to field an airstirp ontop...

China has been in the warshipbuilding industry since the 1950's but had it's first three decades of showing basicly no progress at all. They were tied to redesing already obcolent soviet warship models and had huge proplems in the very basics of technology not to mention about the workmanship and quality issues. This was ofcourse becouse of the illfavorably conditions. Non existing industrial base and shipbuilding traditions, Breakup with the "big-brother", genious marvels of "great leap forwards" and "cultural revolution"...they were the biggest overall reaosn for the backwardness of the chinese development in almoust all areas. Only in late 80's and early 90's was there any progress. This progress emerged as it would do with in reasonable limits. It was a huge leap to developt the first indegenious destroyer design and it was done so basicly with blind-folden. These babysteps were shaky and unbalanced but still they headed forwards.

I don't see what cultural revolution got to do with building a carrier Yes China lost years in technical development during the cultural revolution But the lack of progress in military progress has more to do with funding Don't forget that military funding hardly increase at all during the 70's and 80's In fact it was decreases for most of those years To compare the technical level of China in 70's and now Doesn't do justice at all As the previous poster mention China is the 3rd largest ship building country after Korea and Japan And it built sophisticated ship like LNG carrier and Supertanker

.
China has no experience of building warships of over 10,000 tons. To design a small VSTOL carrier of just above that tonnage would be enourmous and almoust impossiple task to the chinese builders. Aircraft carriers aren't container ships. They are not oil tankers, or any other civilian sector "big ships". Aircraft carriers are the biggest and most complicated warships existing today and to have one that is actually workable ship, you need to know exactly what you are doing. How on earht do you expect chinese to know what it takes to build 93,000 ton supercarrier? Yeas they have studied Varyag...The last offsping of another noob country's effort to do exactly the same as Chinese are doing now. And suprise, suprise they didn't do that well. Soviets carriers were from the shipdesign point of wiev completely unsuccesfull. Moskvas and Kievs had poor seakeeping and handeling proplems and with the politicans screwing the decision making, the air-capabilities were as horrible. Varyag (which followed the hulldesign from the Kiev class) is 60,000 ton carrier with practical aviation cababilites of that of 27,000 ton Centaurio class. Only difference is that at least Centaurios had Catabults before the VSTOL hype...
Studying Varyag is only good if you wish to point out what you shouldn't do. But thats all what China has now and they should make all the efforts of it. But it's not going to help them to make this supercarrier that this "article" promises...

I believe your prejudice got the better of yourself because russia failed doesn't mean China has to fail too It has no correlation at all. Anyway China has better Industrial base except weapon development It is way better than Russia at it's height Shipping company doesn't buy shoddy product

China doesen't need 80 years, but it still needs years....First to get balanced and viable shipdevelopment line with the normal warshisp, then get the Varyag finished and only after then will they be ready for the next challenge which is to developt an indegenious carriers but those will be far more realistic than this mentioned above. It takes decades at least. My obinion and guess is that we see one emerging to the building phase around 2020...

Well let see who is right
 

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread

I don't see what cultural revolution got to do with building a carrier Yes China lost years in technical development during the cultural revolution But the lack of progress in military progress has more to do with funding Don't forget that military funding hardly increase at all during the 70's and 80's In fact it was decreases for most of those years To compare the technical level of China in 70's and now Doesn't do justice at all As the previous poster mention China is the 3rd largest ship building country after Korea and Japan And it built sophisticated ship like LNG carrier and Supertanker

And didnt I just say that oil tankers arent aircraftcarriers;) Cultural revolution as well as other elements of inflexibility in chinese military hierarchy are the most important single factors that counts. China is emerging and by industrial and economical level capaple of building big naval units, why not carriers as well, but that just wont be enough. If you would given ten million dollars, would you be able to build ten million dollar ship?? (presuming that you arent shipengineer)

I believe your prejudice got the better of yourself because russia failed doesn't mean China has to fail too It has no correlation at all. Anyway China has better Industrial base except weapon development It is way better than Russia at it's height Shipping company doesn't buy shoddy product
In economical level China of today migth be in better hands than Soviets at their higth, but trust me, China isent even bar with Soviets at their peak as what comes to naval devolpment/heritage/tradition and capacity to produce balanced fleet.
And still Russia failed... And Im not saying that China will fail, quite contrary, as soon as china gets carrier, the better, no matter how lousy desing it pics. The years of neglegt needs to be taken up, and no time is to be wasted anymore, but the crude fact is that Chinese military shipbuilding isent on that level that It can produce those things that the dupious article promises
 

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread

I don't see what cultural revolution got to do with building a carrier Yes China lost years in technical development during the cultural revolution But the lack of progress in military progress has more to do with funding Don't forget that military funding hardly increase at all during the 70's and 80's In fact it was decreases for most of those years To compare the technical level of China in 70's and now Doesn't do justice at all As the previous poster mention China is the 3rd largest ship building country after Korea and Japan And it built sophisticated ship like LNG carrier and Supertanker

And didnt I just say that oil tankers arent aircraftcarriers;) Cultural revolution as well as other elements of inflexibility in chinese military hierarchy are the most important single factors that counts. China is emerging and by industrial and economical level capaple of building big naval units, why not carriers as well, but that just wont be enough. If you would given ten million dollars, would you be able to build ten million dollar ship?? (presuming that you arent shipengineer)

I believe your prejudice got the better of yourself because russia failed doesn't mean China has to fail too It has no correlation at all. Anyway China has better Industrial base except weapon development It is way better than Russia at it's height Shipping company doesn't buy shoddy product
In economical level China of today migth be in better hands than Soviets at their higth, but trust me, China isent even bar with Soviets at their peak as what comes to naval devolpment/heritage/tradition and capacity to produce balanced fleet.
And still Russia failed... And Im not saying that China will fail, quite contrary, as soon as china gets carrier, the better, no matter how lousy desing it pics. The years of neglegt needs to be taken up, and no time is to be wasted anymore, but the crude fact is that Chinese military shipbuilding isent on that level that It can produce those things that the dupious article promises
 

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread

I don't see what cultural revolution got to do with building a carrier Yes China lost years in technical development during the cultural revolution But the lack of progress in military progress has more to do with funding Don't forget that military funding hardly increase at all during the 70's and 80's In fact it was decreases for most of those years To compare the technical level of China in 70's and now Doesn't do justice at all As the previous poster mention China is the 3rd largest ship building country after Korea and Japan And it built sophisticated ship like LNG carrier and Supertanker

And didnt I just say that oil tankers arent aircraftcarriers;) Cultural revolution as well as other elements of inflexibility in chinese military hierarchy are the most important single factors that counts. China is emerging and by industrial and economical level capaple of building big naval units, why not carriers as well, but that just wont be enough. If you would given ten million dollars, would you be able to build ten million dollar ship?? (presuming that you arent shipengineer)

I believe your prejudice got the better of yourself because russia failed doesn't mean China has to fail too It has no correlation at all. Anyway China has better Industrial base except weapon development It is way better than Russia at it's height Shipping company doesn't buy shoddy product
In economical level China of today migth be in better hands than Soviets at their higth, but trust me, China isent even bar with Soviets at their peak as what comes to naval devolpment/heritage/tradition and capacity to produce balanced fleet.
And still Russia failed... And Im not saying that China will fail, quite contrary, as soon as china gets carrier, the better, no matter how lousy desing it pics. The years of neglegt needs to be taken up, and no time is to be wasted anymore, but the crude fact is that Chinese military shipbuilding isent on that level that It can produce those things that the dupious article promises
 

Obi Wan Russell

Jedi Master
VIP Professional
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread

And still Russia failed...
Let's be clear here. Russia did not fail to deploy a CV fleet for technical reasons, but for financial reasons. They went bankrupt in 1990/91 and money for military R&D dried up. The two Kuznetzovs were built with ski jumps instead of catapults because the cats were still under development (and considering all the soviet spies in the US and Britain over the course of the cold war I'd be surprised if they didn't have a full set of plans for a steam catapult somewhere). The third CV, the Ulyanovsk was to be the sea going test bed for catapults (two in the waist position with a ski jump at the bow) which would allow a wider range of aircraft to be deployed, ie AEW and COD for example. Cats would then most likely be retrofitted to the two earlier ships to allow the same types to be operated by all (economies of scale here). Ski jumps allow QRA fighters to launch at short notice, but without AEW aircraft their value is much diminished, hence the need for cats. The technology involved in steam catapults is not particularly advanced, certainly for a nation (China) with a manned space program, and the expertise necessary could be acquired from several nations around the world (Argentina, Brazil, Australia,-who provided a whole catapult in 1985! Holland, India, UK, USA) although some would be less likely than others to provide their engineering services, money talks.

Could China build a CV as big as a Nimitz? Yes. Would it be of any military value? No, it would be a death trap at their current level of shipbuilding knowledge, but might be useable enough to provide a training CV for a while. Varyag is at leased based on a proven design (albeit one proven inferior to western practice, it works at least) so sensibly she will be the PLANs first step. The Chinese aren't stupid, and they are fast learners, and Varyag will be like going to university for Chinese engineers and seamen alike, as much for what it will show them not to do as for what they will learn positively. Roll on 2008...
 

Obi Wan Russell

Jedi Master
VIP Professional
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread

And still Russia failed...
Let's be clear here. Russia did not fail to deploy a CV fleet for technical reasons, but for financial reasons. They went bankrupt in 1990/91 and money for military R&D dried up. The two Kuznetzovs were built with ski jumps instead of catapults because the cats were still under development (and considering all the soviet spies in the US and Britain over the course of the cold war I'd be surprised if they didn't have a full set of plans for a steam catapult somewhere). The third CV, the Ulyanovsk was to be the sea going test bed for catapults (two in the waist position with a ski jump at the bow) which would allow a wider range of aircraft to be deployed, ie AEW and COD for example. Cats would then most likely be retrofitted to the two earlier ships to allow the same types to be operated by all (economies of scale here). Ski jumps allow QRA fighters to launch at short notice, but without AEW aircraft their value is much diminished, hence the need for cats. The technology involved in steam catapults is not particularly advanced, certainly for a nation (China) with a manned space program, and the expertise necessary could be acquired from several nations around the world (Argentina, Brazil, Australia,-who provided a whole catapult in 1985! Holland, India, UK, USA) although some would be less likely than others to provide their engineering services, money talks.

Could China build a CV as big as a Nimitz? Yes. Would it be of any military value? No, it would be a death trap at their current level of shipbuilding knowledge, but might be useable enough to provide a training CV for a while. Varyag is at leased based on a proven design (albeit one proven inferior to western practice, it works at least) so sensibly she will be the PLANs first step. The Chinese aren't stupid, and they are fast learners, and Varyag will be like going to university for Chinese engineers and seamen alike, as much for what it will show them not to do as for what they will learn positively. Roll on 2008...
 
Top