PLA Small arms

testing123

New Member
Registered Member
I have to apologize for my earlier posts. I mixed up the photos from the SL-T3X and the QMK-171A. The QMK actually has a different reticle, with hash marks at different distances and no illuminated post below the chevron. The QMK also has brighter fiber optic illumination.

Below is a daytime comparison between the QMK-171A and the Elcan OS4X (fixed four power model). The camera wasn't perfectly aligned because I still don't have my equipment, so you'll have to excuse the chromatic aberration. I'll have a video review ready shortly and will keep you posted.

I've heard great things about the Elcan glass, and I wasn't disappointed. I thought the QMK might have better glass than the ACOG and wanted to compare it with something that I knew did. I'm extremely impressed. The QMK and T3X have glass comparable to an Elcan at the $400~ price point.

The QMK is made of forged aluminium and feels dense and solid in the hand, just like an ACOG. It's more svelte than the T3X which is billet machined and has a larger body and ocular lens housing despite being the same weight. Neither optic has a diopter, even though the T3X appears to. Both the T3X and QMK weight exactly 333g (11.75oz) with their mounts. Both the picatinny and proprietary Type 95 rail adapter are the exact same weight.
 

Attachments

  • qmk.JPG
    qmk.JPG
    1,022 KB · Views: 98
  • elcan.JPG
    elcan.JPG
    920.3 KB · Views: 96
  • qmk-slt3x.jpg
    qmk-slt3x.jpg
    298.2 KB · Views: 105

sabiothailand

Junior Member
Registered Member
I have to apologize for my earlier posts. I mixed up the photos from the SL-T3X and the QMK-171A. The QMK actually has a different reticle, with hash marks at different distances and no illuminated post below the chevron. The QMK also has brighter fiber optic illumination.

Below is a daytime comparison between the QMK-171A and the Elcan OS4X (fixed four power model). The camera wasn't perfectly aligned because I still don't have my equipment, so you'll have to excuse the chromatic aberration. I'll have a video review ready shortly and will keep you posted.

I've heard great things about the Elcan glass, and I wasn't disappointed. I thought the QMK might have better glass than the ACOG and wanted to compare it with something that I knew did. I'm extremely impressed. The QMK and T3X have glass comparable to an Elcan at the $400~ price point.

The QMK is made of forged aluminium and feels dense and solid in the hand, just like an ACOG. It's more svelte than the T3X which is billet machined and has a larger body and ocular lens housing despite being the same weight. Neither optic has a diopter, even though the T3X appears to. Both the T3X and QMK weight exactly 333g (11.75oz) with their mounts. Both the picatinny and proprietary Type 95 rail adapter are the exact same weight.
How do you just have access to all these stuffs?? I've never seen any QMK scopes used outside the PLA at all.
 

QIUSIYU

Senior Member
Registered Member
I have to apologize for my earlier posts. I mixed up the photos from the SL-T3X and the QMK-171A. The QMK actually has a different reticle, with hash marks at different distances and no illuminated post below the chevron. The QMK also has brighter fiber optic illumination.

Below is a daytime comparison between the QMK-171A and the Elcan OS4X (fixed four power model). The camera wasn't perfectly aligned because I still don't have my equipment, so you'll have to excuse the chromatic aberration. I'll have a video review ready shortly and will keep you posted.

I've heard great things about the Elcan glass, and I wasn't disappointed. I thought the QMK might have better glass than the ACOG and wanted to compare it with something that I knew did. I'm extremely impressed. The QMK and T3X have glass comparable to an Elcan at the $400~ price point.

The QMK is made of forged aluminium and feels dense and solid in the hand, just like an ACOG. It's more svelte than the T3X which is billet machined and has a larger body and ocular lens housing despite being the same weight. Neither optic has a diopter, even though the T3X appears to. Both the T3X and QMK weight exactly 333g (11.75oz) with their mounts. Both the picatinny and proprietary Type 95 rail adapter are the exact same weight.
Still a comparison of 200 meters?
 

QIUSIYU

Senior Member
Registered Member
Still using Airsoft Garbage to demonstrate models? How are they gonna sell their guns if they don't allow real guns on the showcase no wonder none of the investors paid attention to it.
Who told you that it was an airsoft? These guns were exhibited at the 2024 Zhuhai Air Show
 

QIUSIYU

Senior Member
Registered Member
Shaoxing SWAT
Gk3_1H1XgAAFhOa
Gk3_2KuacAA0qGC
 
Top