I feel like Pakistan is better off investing in more maneuverable missiles for point defense capabilities against low flying missiles and drones. They are more economical and will probably address the threat from India better.
More maneuverable as in? HQ17? Yitian? Anyway, drones and some of the new missile can be cheap and can be costly for defenders to shoot every threat down using missile.I feel like Pakistan is better off investing in more maneuverable missiles for point defense capabilities against low flying missiles and drones. They are more economical and will probably address the threat from India better.
More maneuverable as in? HQ17? Yitian? Anyway, drones and some of the new missile can be cheap and can be costly for defenders to shoot every threat down using missile.
HQ-13 (combined gun/missle structure) is a thing in light bdes, which lack organic higher level SAM cover. Until now they were ¬naked to air threat out of manpad reach.
My understanding is that both missile vehicle and combined vehicle (as well as their TAR radar) operate within same units, maybe role-divided within battery(like Buk unit halves: TELARs, TELs+TARs).HQ-13 should just be the missile (i.e. FB-10A). The combined gun/missile vehicle is apparently called LD-35L/SWS3.
I'm not the only one by far who has seen a 2 rows of four missiles tubes SAM circulating since more than two years on China's roads and rails.
Now it's deployed...
View attachment 153847
more & more is emerging...
So we have
HQ-26 (~PAC 3 MSE/SM-6) - 8 tube,
HQ-19 (~ THAAD) - 6 tube,
HQ-29 (~S-500/PL-19 Nudol) - 2 tube, &
PC-19/DN-3? - single tube
(long range ASAT, based on KZ-1)
Now, we all have to wait for 3rd September parade. Probably it might make an appearance.Seems like another user on this forum (plus a post on CDF and Twitter) have also noted several other unknown SAMs/ABMs seem in satellite images. The one that you posted has the rumored designation "HQ-26" attached to it, although I have no idea where that came from.
See here:
Any idea on what the other ones could be?
If the SAM that you observed have been around for a couple of years, chances are that it might make an appearance in their September parade.
Anyone have a rundown of which systems are thought to have capability against ICBM velocity targets?more & more is emerging...
So we have
HQ-26 (~PAC 3 MSE/SM-6) - 8 tube,
HQ-19 (~ THAAD) - 6 tube,
HQ-29 (~S-500/PL-19 Nudol) - 2 tube, &
PC-19/DN-3? - single tube
(long range ASAT, based on KZ-1)
Most likely DN-3.Anyone have a rundown of which systems are thought to have capability against ICBM velocity targets?
HQ-19 should have mid-course intercept capability. In fact, it is equivalent to THAAD-ER, not just THAAD.Anyone have a rundown of which systems are thought to have capability against ICBM velocity targets?