Equation
Lieutenant General
Hold the Phone, Call the President Wake the Kids and Hold on to your Socks!!
I assembled a Panel of Experts and surveyed them for there opinions
Will this new Godzilla movie will be Japan's or the American Godzilla?
Hold the Phone, Call the President Wake the Kids and Hold on to your Socks!!
I assembled a Panel of Experts and surveyed them for there opinions
It's going to be Japan's Godzilla. They called Gareth Edwards's Godzilla... fat. Also I'm sure there's a little ego involved which is understandable.
I'd like my monster to have a little girth... Tall and skinny? a little skimpy to me...
I don't think any of the Japanese Godzillas could be considered skinny except maybe in Revenge of Godzilla, where he was more neck, and that's just comparable to the other versions. Gareth's Edward's Godzilla... he was a little chubby especially with those stubby feet.
It looked more like a Iguana. Actually because it did what it did I have come to forgive Emmerich for that abomination. I still hate it but I can forgive. Why?Well whatever form the new Godzilla takes, I have no doubt it'll be 100X better than the Roland Emmerich fiasco of 1998. He almost single handedly doom the entire franchise with the disastrous oversized T-rex lookalike!
I'll chip in for Interstellar as well -- **************spoilers ahead ***************
I think the movie was ambitious in scope, and I could respect and appreciate the lengths to which they went to depict "realistic" long haul space travel, as well as some of the physics involved -- the redocking scene after Matt Damon blows open the Endurance is a great example.
However, by trying to make the movie so realistic, I can't help but poke holes in it, physics/practicality wise (story wise comes later). These qualms aren't big issues, but:
-Why did the initial Ranger leaving earth need a rocket booster if the Ranger shuttles could leave the other planets through VTOL/direct ascent on their own power? Of course if the other planets have a small radius (even if they have 80% or 130% earth's gravity), then the escape velocity of the Ranger shuttle could be correspondingly smaller. That said, this is a smaller issue I have, because there are ways to explain this. I just feel like they wanted a dramatic "leaving" sequence.
-Shoudln't it have taken Cooper months to retrain and learn the mission, instead of just leaving right on cue?
-Are the Ranger shuttles frigging water proof?? Why?? And are they able to survive a mile high tidal wave and still fly?
-Why did the inside of the Endurance's stasis pod room look like it was an old bathroom, with chipped paint and everything? Wouldn't the interior of such a vessel seek to minimize tiny floating particles that could damage circuitry or enter individual's mouths and noses?
The plot is a bigger issue for me:
-Introducing 5th dimensional beings/humanity in far future in the end is the ultimate dues ex mechina, especially for a film that has tried to be so realistic. I'm left wondering if everything else prior to Cooper entering the blackhole was thus pointless, because it felt like everything was just a distraction for Cooper and TARS to get the blackhole's data
-Why did the 5th dimensional beings choose Murph's frigging bedroom as the vehicle of communication for Cooper?? Are the future 5th dimensional beings that fond of symbolism and poetry? Couldn't they have created a tesseract that allowed Cooper to interact with a blackboard in (adult) Murph's office in NASA or something? that way he could have simply written out everything on a blackboard instead of having to translate it via morse code to that stupid watch. There are so many other more practical ways for Cooper to return the information back to Murph. Of course, I understand that Nolan wanted something poignant and symbolic and personal. For a movie like Inception, symbolism can work given everything is occurring in a dream. But for Interstellar, everything is happening in physical reality where symbolism shouldn't matter as much. It feels shoe horned.
-How did Murph know it was her father who was the ghost/sending her the information??
-Why didn't earth send another expedition through the wormhole in the years after Endurance left, or even after Murph solved the gravity issue?
I can appreciate Nolan bringing sci-fi ideas on the big screen in the most realistic way in recent years, and despite the plot holes and skepticism regarding issues of practicality, it also works on an emotional level. Cinematography is also fantastic, but these days with CGI and practical effects nothing is particularly mind blowing. I will say that the entire redocking scene after Matt Damon's screw up is quite epic -- the music there was amazing.
Personally I give it a 6.75/10 -- for comparison, I rate Inception as a 9.5/10.
**********END SPOILERS ************
You forgot where the light on the planets came from (since they circle a black hole).
You'd think that a black hole — which traps everything, including light — would be invisible. But that's not true.
If you could look at a black hole at different angles, you would see a strange warping motion of the background starlight. This is because black holes warp the space around them, so what you're seeing is an altered version of the real thing — similar to how you see a distorted image of an object when it's immersed in water. See an animation of this warping below:
-Why did the initial Ranger leaving earth need a rocket booster if the Ranger shuttles could leave the other planets through VTOL/direct ascent on their own power? Of course if the other planets have a small radius (even if they have 80% or 130% earth's gravity), then the escape velocity of the Ranger shuttle could be correspondingly smaller. That said, this is a smaller issue I have, because there are ways to explain this. I just feel like they wanted a dramatic "leaving" sequence
-Shoudln't it have taken Cooper months to retrain and learn the mission, instead of just leaving right on cue?
-Are the Ranger shuttles frigging water proof?? Why?? And are they able to survive a mile high tidal wave and still fly?
-Why did the inside of the Endurance's stasis pod room look like it was an old bathroom, with chipped paint and everything? Wouldn't the interior of such a vessel seek to minimize tiny floating particles that could damage circuitry or enter individual's mouths and noses?
-Introducing 5th dimensional beings/humanity in far future in the end is the ultimate dues ex mechina, especially for a film that has tried to be so realistic. I'm left wondering if everything else prior to Cooper entering the blackhole was thus pointless, because it felt like everything was just a distraction for Cooper and TARS to get the blackhole's data
-Why did the 5th dimensional beings choose Murph's frigging bedroom as the vehicle of communication for Cooper?? Are the future 5th dimensional beings that fond of symbolism and poetry? Couldn't they have created a tesseract that allowed Cooper to interact with a blackboard in (adult) Murph's office in NASA or something? that way he could have simply written out everything on a blackboard instead of having to translate it via morse code to that stupid watch.
-Why didn't earth send another expedition through the wormhole in the years after Endurance left, or even after Murph solved the gravity issue?