Miscellaneous News

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
Nope, and their website is unaccessible without a VPN. However, BBC reporters and journalists can still operate in China.
That sounds more like a yes, the BBC can broadcast to get it message out inside China.

I saw a couple of spoofs from Chinese youtube videos, that mocked BBC reporting.

The BBC is broadcasting their anti-China Indian views inside China, it is getting through but the reaction is comical, fake news comical. LOL!

:p
 

j17wang

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Whites thinking they can do whatever they want over there in Asia.

Doesn't the fact that he is white mean he should know better, and be held to higher "western standards". They need to make an example, give the guy the death penalty and make sure his family pays the appropriate bullet fee. You follow Asian laws when your in Asia, no exception.
 

Mr T

Senior Member
China does have the legitimate right to response when the interests involves a Chinese entity operating in a foreign country
Then on what basis does the CCP say censorship of international media in China, including the internet, are "internal affairs"? Or is it your view that it's ok for non-Chinese citizens such as myself and foreign governments to criticise censorship in China because it concerns the international media as well as domestic Chinese media? That would certainly be an unpopular position on this forum and PRC social media.
all monies are passed onto the government, who then passes the funds back to the BBC in the form of a grant-in-aid by a department of the state
The money is for the BBC (and a small amount goes to other channels like Channel 4). The government does not have discretion to not pay the funds to the BBC. If it didn't the BBC would take the government to court and the courts would order the money be handed over.

Also how the BBC is funded is irrelevant because it is not controlled by a political party. It isn't even controlled by the British state. Financing does not mean control.

their editorial choice to question to ministers with difficult questions about their own internal affairs is irrelevant, this extents also onto questions of views and actions of ministers and government regarding foreign policy which is an internal matter until an official statement by said ministers or by the government is made.

In the same way, the editorial choice of CGTN to express the position of the government of PRC is their own business so long as the programs presents facts.
I honestly have no idea what you mean. The BBC carries critical reports of government internal and foreign policy. It hosts critics of both internal and foreign policy. It doesn't just repeat ministerial statements.
... the state media company merely made the editorial choice to stand with a pro-state view
CGTN is required by Chinese law to follow media directives handed down by Chinese regulators. That isn't the same as to say it just repeats statements made by Chinese ministers. Along with other Chinese media groups it is handed instructions on how to cover various issues. China Digital Times publishes
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
of these, but I'm sure they're available elsewhere.

Regarding the Chinese Kuomintang’s March 7 by-election for chairperson, it is important to keep it low-key. You may report objective news on the circumstances and results of the by-election to Taiwanese and foreign readers, but do not hype related topics. Reports must not touch on our relationship with the Kuomintang, and must not analyze or predict future cooperation between the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and the CCP. If the person elected makes critical, false, or negative remarks about issues concerning the mainland and cross-Strait relations, they can be criticized. (March 7, 2020) [
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
]


In contrast the BBC receives no such directives.

Al Jazeera’s editorial choice to express views that are pro-Doha is the same as your above accusation you place on the Chinese
Again, you're ignoring the Ofcom rules. CGTN had their licence revoked because it is ultimately controlled by a political party, the CCP. No one would expect a Chinese state TV channel to just run negative stories about China or even to be negative about China in the round.

If you have evidence that Al Jazeera is controlled by a political party, you're free to make a complaint to Ofcom. But my guess is they will want some evidence.

I am not sure how to response to this... since if fairness is main driving force behind the rules then if almost all channels have one singular voice... and that is anti-China...
Fairness is the drive behind the no political party ownership rule. It's unrelated to whether channels can have negative stories about the Chinese Communist Party because those aren't part of Ofcom rules. There are impartiality rules, but those aren't triggered by how China is sometimes reported in the UK. Chinese officials/diplomats have been invited on to UK TV to talk about allegations made against the Chinese government.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Liu Xiaoming had a 20 minute interview broadcast on a prime-time weekend political/news show last year. That was a huge opportunity to put across the CCP's viewpoint.

in that case the initial justification to award the license was enough for the UK to award the license
It means one of two things. One, the no political party ownership rule did not exist when the licence was granted and CCTV-9/CGTN wasn't in breach of the rules. Two, the rule existed but Ofcom simply didn't know enough about the channel's ownership to refuse the licence. If the licence was granted in error that doesn't mean CGTN can complain Ofcom finally understood that it was controlled by the CCP.
 

canniBUS

Junior Member
Registered Member
It is obvious the BBC represents a political party. The UK like all capitalist countries are one party states, ruled by the party of the capitalist class and the BBC acts as their propagandists. Look at the lies and slander against Jeremy Corbyn who wanted to institute some mild social democratic reforms. Any threats against the profits of the wealthiest 0.1% is ruthlessly denounced by the capitalist state machine, the media including BBC, is just one small part of the organs of oppression.
 

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
Well here's more BBC lies being exposed. What has China ever done to you to warrant such hatred?


Victim’ in BBC report found to have changed her anti-China story multiple times

By Global Times Published: Feb 07, 2021 01:15 AM


The source in the BBC’s sensational report accusing China of “mass rape” in the training centers in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region has been found to have changed her “testimony” multiple times in the past years, especially after she was found and “supported” by a US-based-and-funded anti-China organization when she began to make the latest “rape” accusation.

Tursunay Ziawudun, the “victim” in a BBC report who recently claimed to have been gang-raped in a training center in Xinyuan county, Ili Kazak Autonomous Prefecture, first appeared in the media in October 2019. She was in Almaty, Kazakhstan at the time, and the interview she gave included no allegations of rape or harsh treatment.

Then, in an interview released on October 15, 2019 by Radio Free Asia, one of the US government’s overseas broadcasting agencies, Tursunay made no direct claim that she had been raped. On February 15, 2020, when BuzzFeed News interviewed her, she said she was “terrified she might be raped,” but that she “wasn’t beaten or abused.”

According to materials from a website named moonofalabama.org, in September 2020, the US-based Uyghur Human Rights Project (UHRP) picked Tursunay up and began to “use her for their agitation against China.”

The BBC’s report released on Wednesday said the UHRP helped Tursunay get to the US where she is applying to stay.

The UHRP is part of the US-backed World Uyghur Congress, which is generally believed to seek the fall of China. The project is funded by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). The NED granted the UHRP a "whopping $1,244,698 between 2016 and 2019," according to the Grayzone.

After the UHRP stepped in, Tursunay’s testimony changed and she claimed to have been raped in training centers. This claim appeared in the BBC report, along with some other small details that were different.

For example, she said her "earrings were yanked out," where previously she had said that Police “told the women to take off their necklaces and earrings." In the BuzzFeed interview she said: “I wasn’t beaten or abused.” In her later BBC account she said she was beaten and raped.

These reports of "camps," "forced labor," "genocide" and "sexual assault" show the West's escalating hype over Xinjiang. These media reports are aimed at future political moves, an old tactic used by the Western media and governments. This is why so many people in different countries have stood up to criticize the BBC reports, Jia Chunyang, an expert at the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, told the Global Times.

Global Times


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

NiuBiDaRen

Brigadier
Registered Member
Alex Turnbull, son of ex Aussie PM Malcolm Turnbull, squatting in Singapore and asking Chinese Americans to go back to China. While saying he feels sorry for Chinese people. Oops! I've heard a lot about how Westerners come to Singapore and do sleazy things to the Chinese there even though Chinese are the majority in Singapore.

 
Last edited:
Top