Miscellaneous News

GZDRefugee

Senior Member
Registered Member
1. Move to a new country
2. Threaten federal law enforcement agency of that country
3. ?
4. Profit!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(hope you guys enjoyed the throwback meme format)
They'll probably win, too. Canadians will starve before policy will change to prevent labor exploitation.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

‘Your rhetoric has indeed crossed the line,” Chinese Embassy in ROK says over USFK commander’s ‘dagger’ rhetoric​

In response to US Forces Korea Commander Xavier Brunson’s rhetoric calling South Korea a “dagger” aimed at China and his previous rhetoric described South Koreas as “an island or a fixed aircraft carrier between Japan and the Chinese mainland,” a spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in South Korea questioned on Thursday whether Brunson’s hostile and aggressive anti-China comments were authorized or he intended to challenge the consensus reached during the meeting between Chinese and US heads of state in Beijing. Does referring to the host country as military weapons such as an “aircraft carrier” or a “dagger” reflect his belligerence or an attempt to use other countries as pawns, the spokesperson asked.

The responsibilities of US Forces Korea are clear, and China’s position toward US Forces Korea is also clear, the spokesperson said, adding that China hopes the commander of US Forces Korea will respect countries in the region and do more to promote regional peace and stability.

“We have noticed that some South Korean media outlets published commentaries cautioning Mr Brunson that ‘you crossed the line.’ We would also like to tell the US Forces Korea commander that “your rhetoric has indeed crossed the line,” the spokesperson said.

So the US has basically said they will use South Korea to bomb China. If you want to give North Korea a opportunity for reunification then go for it.
 

Lethe

Captain
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The lead photo reportedly dates from a September 2025 encounter in the South China Sea. Without being able to identify the 052DL, she is at least 25 years younger than the Canadian frigate she is accompanying, HMCS Ville de Quebec, which was commissioned in 1994. Perhaps PLAN's radio address could include an offer to render assistance if required.
 
Last edited:

Chevalier

Major
Registered Member

siegecrossbow

Field Marshall
Staff member
Super Moderator

Israel and Zionists are formalising and cementing their control over the U.S. military in perpetuity. The coming draft of Americans will be to send them as goyim slaves in the drive for greater Israel.


we are already seeing such wonderful synergy in how Zionist ally indiansupplied material in the blue origin disaster.
Who said that India doesn’t contribute anything to BRICS again???
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Mercedes-Benz may be shut out of U.S. market under bill aimed at Chinese automaker ownership​

Mercedes-Benz could find itself shut out of the U.S. auto market — banned from making or selling new vehicles in the country — under legislation making its way through Congress.

New bipartisan legislation aimed at limiting Chinese involvement in the U.S. auto market may sweep in Mercedes-Benz unless the bill is changed or the German automaker’s largest shareholder sells its stake.

The bill, the Motor Vehicle Modernization Act of 2026, would prohibit automakers that have “any direct or indirect equity interest by a foreign-adversary government,” such as China, from importing, selling or manufacturing vehicles for sale in the U.S.

Mercedes-Benz’s largest individual shareholder is the state-owned Chinese automaker BAIC, formerly the Beijing Automotive Industrial Corp., with a 9.98% share. The potential implications of the legislation on the automaker are previously unreported.

Several people familiar with the legislation who spoke to CNBC cited gray areas in the bill that, depending on how they’re interpreted, could ban Mercedes-Benz from operating in the U.S.

Two sources who agreed to speak on the condition of anonymity for fear of repercussions or because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly said they believe the bill, as it’s currently written, would ban the company.

“The language is unambiguous,” said a former automotive policy advisor and lobbyist who was consulted about the bill.

Daniel Kelly, press secretary for the Energy and Commerce Committee, confirmed the details of the legislation. He declined to comment directly on potential impacts for individual companies, including Mercedes-Benz.

A spokesman for Mercedes-Benz declined to comment on the legislation but told CNBC on Friday the automaker has two large assembly plants and employs more than 10,000 people in the U.S.

A cap on foreign ownership

The bill comes as lawmakers in both parties seek to prevent Chinese automakers from gaining a foothold in the U.S. market, even as Chinese ownership already runs through parts of the global auto industry.

The bill, which is sponsored by House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Brett Guthrie, R-Ky., is currently a House-only initiative with no Senate companion. It includes exemptions for China-backed companies, but not if they’re directly or indirectly owned by the Chinese government.

Automakers that have manufactured passenger vehicles in the U.S. for at least five years before Jan. 1, 2026, could qualify for an exemption. But the bill says that exemption does not apply to companies with “any direct or indirect equity interest by a foreign-adversary government.”

China is listed as a foreign adversary along with Russia and North Korea.

The bill aims to ban companies with such ownership from manufacturing, selling or importing vehicles in the U.S. for five years upon enactment of the legislation.

It’s unclear where the ownership language originated or whether Mercedes-Benz was inadvertently targeted, but Chinese ownership has been a major concern for U.S. politicians. Last year, the Trump administration signed off on a deal to keep social media platform TikTok operating in the U.S. via the creation of a new entity, in which China’s ByteDance retains just under 20% ownership.

Though BAIC is a company owned by the Chinese government, the bill also includes limits on companies “controlled by” a foreign adversary, defined as a 15% stake by a “person or combination of foreign persons.”

Mercedes-Benz’s second-largest individual shareholder is Chinese billionaire Li Shufu, founder and chairman of China-based Geely, through his Tenaciou3 Prospect Investment firm. That stake amounts to 9.69% of Mercedes-Benz shares.

Combined, Shufu and BAIC own 19.67% of Mercedes-Benz Group AG, the parent company of the automaker as well as its brands and financial services.

Stephen Ezell, a vice president for global innovation policy at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a Washington, D.C., think tank focused on industrial competitiveness that has studied Chinese automakers, said Mercedes-Benz presents a smaller national security risk than Chinese-controlled automakers.

“If Mercedes were to be included in the bill, I think it would be an unintended consequence that could result in the loss of jobs and profits,” Ezell said.

A separate piece of recently introduced legislation includes a similar 15% ownership stipulation. That bill, the Connected Vehicle Security Act of 2026, was introduced in the Senate by Sens. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, and Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., and in the House by Reps. John Moolenaar, R-Mich., and Debbie Dingell, D-Mich. But exemptions under that legislation have yet to be determined.

The 15% ownership clause, depending on exemptions, could also impact other automakers with Chinese ownership, such as Volvo and smaller manufacturers like Faraday Future, Lotus and Karma Automotive.

‘Details matter’

Mercedes-Benz’s largest U.S. plant is in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. The massive facility has produced more than 5 million vehicles since it began production in 1997, the company said Friday. The automaker also has produced more than 450,000 passenger vans at a facility in South Carolina that started production in 2006, it said.

The German automaker’s lobbying efforts have been minimal in recent years, and bipartisan, according to public records, though it also lobbies through at least two trade associations for automakers to which it belongs.

John Bozzella, CEO of The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, in a letter last week to Guthrie and Energy and Commerce ranking member Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., described the bill as making “substantial progress on several policy priorities that the auto industry in America shares with members of the committee.”

Bozzella wrote China’s strategy to “dominate global automotive manufacturing” poses “a clear and present danger to American economic and national security.”

He said the organization, which represents nearly every major automaker in the U.S., would continue working with lawmakers to get the policy right, adding “details matter.”

The lobbying group declined to comment on the bill’s potential impact on specific automakers.

Autos Drive America, another lobbying group for foreign automakers that includes Mercedes-Benz, also declined to comment on the potential impact, referring to a prior statement regarding the Connected Vehicle Security Act about supporting the “overall goal of this legislation” while ensuring it “does not lead to unintended consequences that could create challenges for U.S. manufacturing.”

The new bills are in addition to previously enacted restrictions on the import and sale of connected vehicles with software from countries such as China starting with the 2027 model year as well as hardware from those countries starting with the 2030 model year.

Connected vehicles have internet access and wireless connectivity with other cars or trucks, technology that supporters say can enhance roadway safety.

Volvo, which is majority-owned by Shufu’s Geely, said on Tuesday that it received specific authorization from the U.S. government to bypass federal bans restricting connected vehicle software and hardware linked to China.

Volvo confirmed its special authorization but did not immediately respond to questions about the other bills and their potential impact on the company.

Volvo Cars sold 121,600 vehicles in the U.S. last year. Mercedes-Benz sold 303,200 passenger cars and 12,400 vans in the country during the same period.

Apparently, Mercedes-Benz is a Chinese company now.

Shufu and BAIC own 19.67% of Mercedes-Benz Group AG

Coming soon. Chinese fast food to be banned to prevent the spread of communism.
 

supercat

Colonel
Decoupling China is easier said than done.

Deal with North Korea first, then talk about China.

0SnXhFg.png


Yeah, just restart the war, see what happens.

Yup, tourists in, "journalists"/paid mouthpieces out.
 
Top