China has been talking about retaliation for a long time, but I don’t understand why there is so little reciprocity in response to hostile actions. When responses do occur, they seem sporadic and delayed. Meanwhile, the opposing side continues to act aggressively without facing consequences.
Damn, your entire being is like an inflamed nerve, isn't it? LOL You're sensitive and aggravated by things most people don't even feel.
Hostile actions are what Panama and Netherlands did. These, I don't even register. It's their right to not use Chinese inverters or Huawei or ZTE for their government funded projects. China bans many Western things in goverment tech sectors on national security grounds. As a matter of fact, I see it as weak that they only
recommend against usage of Huawei or ZTE in their national connectivity when they should be banning these things. We are in a tech war and in a global economic rut. I don't even what these technologies going to them at affordable prices.
What do you think they should do? What is your solution? If you wanna complain about the CCP, talk to me; the CCP is not here to answer your petty crap. Only I am.
Since the PRC’s accession to the WTO in 2001, its agricultural market was opened widely to external and unfair competition with unknown consequences for Chinese farmers due to a lack of comprehensive research. Food security seems to have been treated as a “nice-to-have” rather than a national security priority post-2001, leading to unfair competition between small Chinese farmers and large-scale foreign agribusiness. This is a small reversal, but a very necessary one.
LOL What is unfair competition? What do they have that we don't? You are complaining about a dangerous situation you imagined when the reality is that the CCP's policies have resulted in the Chinese diet rocketting up in protein, malnourishment eradicated, the average Chinese height increasing and China having never suffered any food security crises.
\
