Miscellaneous News

Randomuser

Captain
Registered Member
Another version of the Japanese's excuse:

"Japan killed more than 30 million Chinese during World War II, and Japan should be condemned."

"The CPC famine killed 100 million people, why don't you blame the CPC?"
One is an economic plan that went wrong due to various factors including really bad weather that was unusually bad by chance. Take that away and maybe the thing might have not happened, def not the same extent.

The other is deliberate killing without where nothing would change since it was dependent on intent.

Its not really hard to see.

Btw I find it funny how I have not seen a single US/UK person ever mention they deliberately sanctioned China during famine with the intent of killing more people. That is not random and will not go away.
 

BoraTas

Major
Registered Member
Monroe Doctrine 2.0 isn't going to work painlessly. If US withdraws back to western hemisphere then the dollar will become toilet paper. Without the dollar hegemony US living standards will decrease enormously.

Trump either isn't aware of this, or perhaps he is aware and he finds that acceptable.

Their upcoming war against Venezuela is presumably to establish their lordship over the American continent. If they are going to do it it better be clean win like Gulf War 1.0, if not even the Monroe Doctrine with a weaker US may not be possible. Afterall starting and failing a war in South America is how USA became New United States in Cyberpunk
Trump admin is impulsive and incompetent. I don't think they have a coherent vision and it seems they actually believe "we subsidize the entire world" stuff. There is no US hegemony without the European participation. Even the GWOT was sustained through European bases and most US sanctions would have much less bite without Europeans joining. A single example: China had a rival to Nvidia and Qualcomm by now if the Netherlands was not blocking EUV. The SWIFT is literally European too.
During the Cold War days, sure, but these days, the whole ballgame is about engaging opfor without them even knowing you are there until they get splashed. Not even some modern AAMs will give you the courtesy of a nice clear lock tone before impact.

The very fact you lived to get within WVR of opfor is already overwhelming evidence they are not trying to actually kill you.

In modern air positioning displays like this, a lock tone is purely messaging after a bout of dogfighting to tell the other guy you got them cold and that you are indisputably the superior pilot and/or have the superior plane. Only in the movies or if some literal cold warrior got teleported into the cockpit straight from the 1970s would the pilot genuinely think getting locked in such circumstances means they are seconds away from death.
This is technically not true and has a low relevance to the topic. WVR has nothing to do with the topic too. LPI modes are always separate in fighter radars because of their range and refresh rate penalty, and higher susceptibility to some jamming techniques. Even the J-20A wouldn't always be on the LPI mode.
 

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
Why Japan Defense Minister is afraid to open his comment section? :oops:

All those protests from Japan are really weird, they all basically mount to "if you keep this up we'll get angry and do something!"
But this whole thing since the start has been China catching Takaichi talking smack and basically saying "try me bitch", so threatening to do something is basically threatening China with a good time.

Or as Ayi would say "Reiwa-era far right can't even do winnism properly." They're 20 years behind on military balance between China and Japan and at least one US president behind on current geopolitical tone.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General

I don't know if this is true that Japan is that dependent on Chinese tourism but if yes, that has to be on Europe level entitlement stupid going on right now that they thought China wouldn't pull the trigger. What's in common with everyone in the West? They think everyone is in awe of them according to their own ego and thought the Chinese wouldn't dare. It makes you wonder what lies are the Japanese elite telling their people to think China wouldn't?

I see Japan and maybe also South Korea running to create an alliance with Europe since Trump disrespects them and China is flexing before they ever would admit to themselves they're on the wrong side of history. Maybe because they say China is on the wrong side of history all the time, that's why. It's like how Japan thought it could takeover TPP when the US abandoned it for domestic politics. And what an alliance would it still only be? A bunch of countries with little resources of their own still stuck at needing to sell their exports to maintain their first world lifestyles.
 

Machiavelli

Just Hatched
Registered Member

I don't know if this is true that Japan is that dependent on Chinese tourism but if yes, that has to be on Europe level entitlement stupid going on right now that they thought China wouldn't pull the trigger. What's in common with everyone in the West? They think everyone is in awe of them according to their own ego and thought the Chinese wouldn't dare. It makes you wonder what lies are the Japanese elite telling their people to think China wouldn't?

I see Japan and maybe also South Korea running to create an alliance with Europe since Trump disrespects them and China is flexing before they ever would admit to themselves they're on the wrong side of history. Maybe because they say China is on the wrong side of history all the time, that's why. It's like how Japan thought it could takeover TPP when the US abandoned it for domestic politics. And what an alliance would it still only be? A bunch of countries with little resources of their own still stuck at needing to sell their exports to maintain their first world lifestyles.
Japan wanted to take over the role of the TPP because the japanese thought they could mobilize a counterweight to China, by creating their own economic sphere of influence that would include the ASEAN nations; South Korea; Philippines, and Taiwan, and later tie it with the EU. The problem was, japan could not lead the TPP because japan was permanently dependent on import of energy, import of food, exports of its goods, too small of a domestic market, and did not have either political, or economic sovereignty--U.S' Shiba Inu.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Let's not pretend world politics ever had a single shred of morality to it from the get go. It's all just leverage and gains. China is no different. I don't see why China has to lose on softpower and profit due to some people's subjective sense of moral superiority.
Morality is what you can afford to have. If everything is going well and you either maintain a powerful dominant status or see your coronation date drawing nearer, you are likely to behave very honorably like China is doing. If you see everything you built being torn down and your challenger running you over from behind, you are first likely to try everything within your moral boundaries, then expand those boundaries, and so on until you declare that anything goes: theft, betrayal, robbery, rape, murder, genocide, they are all justified if it can prevent the evil of your challenger from winning. And right now, that is the US.
Its cute they think its only delayed.
It's delayed until Takaichi's term is over and the next guy bulldozes the Yasukuni shrine and comes to Nanjing to lick the ground. And it can't be that guy who drank a spoonful of water off the ground in Fukushima either; it has to be someone who doesn't like eating shit off the floor!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

There is a fundamental misunderstanding on China’s part as to what they think a state visit is for and what westerners think it’s for. To China, these visits are typically thought of as reinforcing and expanding relationships and friendships with other countries. An opportunity to bond. For westerners, these visits are only pomp and circumstance to demonstrate their own importance in front of their own populace and the rest of the world and maybe and opportunity to enact or pry out some kind of advantage whilst in the host country. Parasitic thinking. Should China start considering more the perspective of who they are dealing with and adjusting more instead of trying to push through “win-win” type offers that will always get taken advantage of and never reciprocated?
LMFAO, this fucker came to China smiling like the edges of his mouth were stapled, went on jogs in the park, ran to a meet and greet with students, and even brought Felix Lebrun with him to play some doubles table tennis. Then he begged Xi for some technological cooperation because according to him, France is now the developing country compared to China... except it isn't even able to develop. I bet you he didn't even dare say that shit to Xi or his trip would not have been so pleasant. When he's back home doing his post trip news interview is the first time Xi heard him say anything that sounded like a threat.
 
Last edited:

Phead128

Major
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
All those protests from Japan are really weird, they all basically mount to "if you keep this up we'll get angry and do something!"
But this whole thing since the start has been China catching Takaichi talking smack and basically saying "try me bitch", so threatening to do something is basically threatening China with a good time.

Or as Ayi would say "Reiwa-era far right can't even do winnism properly." They're 20 years behind on military balance between China and Japan and at least one US president behind on current geopolitical tone.
Sanae/right wingers: yea we ain't afraid going to war with China. if they close sealanes, let's go. we'd even sink Fujian carrier, cuz its a rubber ducky.

also Sanae/right wingers: but but my fighters were lighted like christmas tree? how can you shine!? do you know war is dangerous!?

The pacifist pearl clutching is so hilarious.
 
Top