Miscellaneous News

iewgnem

Captain
Registered Member
It's because Shein dares to put a physical store were all the other fancy brands are, and it's turning out to be very popular with the people judging from the long lines they're having.

This isn't about just Shein, this is about being about to define beauty/what's trendy. Being able to define beauty gives you the right to charge a large premium on luxury goods, that's what brands like LV/Chanel/Prada do and how they make the big money. You can see here that Shein making physical inroad into their home tuff means now someone else could be holding the power to define beauty and that rightfully upsets them, but all is fair in love and war.

If you want an example of a Chinese brand that has successfully gained the right to define beauty I would point to no other than Pop Mart and their Labubu which is commanding a very high premium for a soft toy. Shein is basically trying to do something similar and rug pull the old money brands in Paris.
I for one would welcome a cold war in the fashion industry, European indirect theft through BS brands need to be put to an end.
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
Unsurprisingly, Democrats capitulated for nothing. Funny how everytime the Republicans stand their ground even if it is politically damaging to themselves. The Democrats throw the towel in fear it might hurt the Republicans from losing too much. All they got is a promise to vote on healthcare insurance. Guess Americans can expect health insurance to expire in December.

Senate Democrats cave, open path to reopening government​

The Senate took a massive step forward on its way to reopening the government on Sunday, with a group of Senate Democrats caving and joining Republicans in their bid to pass a revamped plan to end the shutdown.

Signs that the shutdown, which entered its 40th day, could be ending became more and more clear as the day went on, particularly with the unveiling of a bipartisan package of spending bills that lawmakers hope to attach to a modified bill to reopen the government.

Eight Senate Democrats crossed the aisle to mark the first step in the GOP’s quest to end the shutdown. Many of the lawmakers that splintered from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., were among those engaged in bipartisan talks over the last several weeks.

Among the defectors were Sens. Angus King, I-Maine, John Fetterman, D-Pa., Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., Jacky Rosen, D-N.M., Tim Kaine, D-Va., and the number two Democrat in the Senate, Dick Durbin, D-Ill.

"The question was, does the shutdown further the goal of achieving some needed support for the extension of the tax credits? Our judgment was that it will not," King said. "It would not produce that result. And the evidence for that is almost seven weeks of fruitless attempts to make that happen."

Schumer and Senate Democrats long stayed the course that they would only vote to reopen the government in exchange for a solid deal on extending expiring Obamacare subsidies.

But the solution developed over the last several days included nothing of the sort. While there were some wins in the updated continuing resolution (CR), like reversals of some of the firings of furloughed workers undertaken by the Trump administration and guaranteeing back pay for furloughed workers, there was no guaranteed victory in sight on the Obamacare issue.

That means that Senate Democrats effectively caved with little to show for their healthcare push, save for the guarantee of a vote on the subsidies from Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., which was reflected in the updated CR.

Schumer panned the compromise deal, and charged that when Republicans rejected Democrats' own counter-proposal that would have extended the expiring subsidies for a year, "They showed that they are against any health care reform."

"This healthcare crisis is so severe, so urgent, so devastating for families back home that I cannot, in good faith, support this CR that fails to address the healthcare crisis," Schumer said.

Thune was optimistic that the plan would work, and reiterated his promise of a vote on the expiring subsidies. However, whatever legislation is produced to address the Obamacare issue is likely to fail.

"Regardless, as I have said for weeks to my Democrat friends, I will schedule a vote on their proposal, and I've committed to having that vote no later than second week in December," he said.

Progressives in the caucus were unhappy with the developments, too.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, charged that it would be a "horrific mistake" for Democrats to cave now without an Obamacare deal.

"If Democrats cave on this issue, what it will say to Donald Trump is that he has a green light to go forward toward authoritarianism," Sanders said. "And I think that would be a tragedy for this country."

Still, there is a long way to go before the government officially reopens.

Sunday’s vote was the first in a series needed in the Senate to modify the original House-passed continuing resolution and combine it with the three-bill spending package and updated CR, which, if passed, would reopen the government until Jan. 30, 2026.

Lawmakers hope that if given the extra time, they could finish funding the government with spending bills rather than turning to another CR or colossal omnibus spending package, which crams all 12 government funding bills into one piece of legislation.

"If we blow this window, we’re going to get stuck with a yearlong CR," Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., said.

And the shutdown won’t end in the Senate, given that the changes to the legislation will need to be greenlit by the House before making it to President Donald Trump’s desk.

Democrats could still extract pain through procedural hurdles unless there is unanimous agreement from all 100 senators to move forward with the remaining votes.

The Obamacare issue is still bubbling on both sides of the aisle, however. Senate Republicans slammed the state of healthcare throughout Saturday, particularly over how the subsidies funneled money to insurance companies

Democrats still remained skeptical if their frustration, and desire to make changes to take on insurance companies, was legitimate.

"The point, I think that's really relevant here, is if they're serious, and I really question whether that's the case," Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

GodRektsNoobs

Senior Member
Registered Member

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
China is killing off samsung, kia, etc let them vent a little its their own country... i mean US colony

Seems that South Korea and Japan, share a similar problem with the United States when it comes to Chinese industry, namely that they cannot compete.

When confronted with a big potentially life threatening problem, our caveman ancestors developed the flight/fight response.

Oh no! That dinosaur is looking at us! What should we do? Run!

That flight/fight response is not really available here for South Korea. There is no where to run with the global trade, and realistically there will not be much fight with these new industries.

All that is left is outbursts of 20th Century racial profiling, like that kind of vulgarity is going to make a difference in any way.

Speaks volumes to that country's politics and culture.

:oops::D
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
Hello, I'm very interested in changes to India's fertility rate, but this article isn't available for free reading. So does this article acknowledge that India's fertility rate has fallen to 1.9?

I believe the key factor for China to avoid conflict with a rising India in the mid-to-late part of this century lies in India's fertility rate plummeting to extremely low levels before completing its industrialization. This would subsequently lead to severe aging, causing the nation's development trajectory to resemble that of certain Latin American countries. By that time, Indian society would be far from matching China's educational standards and manufacturing capabilities, effectively ending India's aspirations to become a superpower.

I do not believe that.

I believe none of that matters, because India will breakup into smaller countries soon because everything there sucks.

Everyone wants to leave.

When no one believes in the country, there is really nothing holding it together.
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
Koreans used to be a lot more anti American and anti Japanese. I suspect a lot of the anti China sentiment was deliberately promoted in order to make Koreans more obedient to American hegemony.

Yeah, I think a lot of this South-Korean anti-Chinese stuff is kind of fake or manufactured.

In the end, the South-Koreans are kind of harmless.

If something is harmless, then how can there be a problem? Under any circumstances?

Something is being propped up.
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
Yes anytime you find out the US has been doing this, all they have to do is accuse China is doing to take attention off the US. Look at how they accused of China of cyber warfare where the US said it would be an act of war if China did it. Then Stuxnet came out used against Iran... The whole kill switch thing is because remember that was accused of what the US can do for any other country that had F-35s. And now China is doing it everywhere. Also there was talk of the US making it a law that automakers had to put a kill switch on cars so that police can stop high speed chases by criminals looking to escape and endangering innocent people's lives.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Seems like straight out of more recent versions of the CIA manual.
 
Top