Miscellaneous News

E

Eventine

Junior Member
Registered Member
GulfLander said:
The Yang Jianli guy, author of FP article, seem a harvard graduate " human rights activist"?
Click to expand...
Regurgitating Western liberal propaganda, as usual. This is one reason I think a ban on Chinese students in the US actually would be beneficial.

These people could never imagine that maybe, just maybe, falling interest in liberal democracy not just in China, but around the world, is a direct consequence of its disastrous track record in the last two decades, from the War on Terror, to the broken expectations of the Obama years, to the rise of Trump and American fascism.

Perhaps Western democracy just isn't all it's hyped up to be? It sure hasn't been a ticket to wealth and prosperity for the vast majority of countries that's adopted it, and the rise of China proves that other political systems can also succeed.
 
Randomuser

Randomuser

Captain
Registered Member
Xiongmao said:
China and Russia should have done more to help Assad defend Syria. This gonna come bite them in the ass.
Click to expand...
Dunno about China but Russia already did all it could. Assad should have been gone years ago but Russian support extended it. The problem is you have to teach a man how to fish and Syria is someone who refuses to learn. There's a reason why all these middle eastern states get wrecked by Israel even when they all team up. Now Russia has its hands full and we see what happens.

Supporting a country like Syria is like investing in crypto. You put a significant portion into it and it can go away overnight.
 
AssassinsMace

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
sabiothailand said:
Weird, why don't Taiwan buy higher quality weapons from the US? Why are they now relying on Indian tech?

The US's already in full support of them, why did they do this?
Click to expand...


The US didn’t take drones seriously as a weapon of war. There was some military official that mocked Elon Musk when he posted about the US should concentrate on drones and not stealth fighters. Maybe it’s that American mentality that thinks that everything comes so easily for Americans overnight that puts them at ease so they don’t think about it.

I’m not saying go all-in on drones but not to take them seriously like the US brass has been doing is asinine. Anyone ever see that video out of the Russian/Ukraine conflict where a Ukrainian FPV drone is going after two soldiers. The drone is buzzing around them like a fly while they’re evading and firing their assault rifles at it at point blank range. All their bullets miss. It’s only when one soldier runs out of bullets he has to throw his assault rifle at it and then hits it and it explodes. That’s how difficult it is to hit something buzzing and jinking around.

I was reading about blasting microwaves at drones as a solution but you have to first spot the drone in order to use it but then if if you use microwaves it affects also everything behind it for some distance meaning you might hit your own assets in the process trying to target drones coming at you from any direction.

I’m reading soldiers are deathly afraid of drones which are essentially flying IEDs that come after them when spotted. And the US is finding it difficult figuring out a defense because of how they didn’t take drones seriously meaning there’s not an effective defense technological or not against them.
 
L

Laviduce

Junior Member
Registered Member
On a side note, neocon/neolib regime bot Ryan McBeth on how to win the next neocon/neolib US instigated war (against China):

The Vietnam Mistake We’re About to Repeat Against China​



Will the next war be waged not just with weapons, but with questions we haven’t answered? In this video, I dive into what the Vietnam War can teach us about a potential future conflict with China. From technological overconfidence to undefined victory conditions, America’s 20-year war in Southeast Asia offers hard-earned lessons we ignore at our peril. As tensions with the People's Republic of China rise—and many experts predict a possible conflict around 2027 or 2028—it's time we ask:
  • What does victory actually mean?
  • Are we prepared for the logistics, legitimacy, and longevity of such a war?
  • Or are we walking into another quagmire with a shiny new uniform?
Vietnam showed us that winning every battle doesn’t mean winning the war. And in a potential war with China, strategic clarity may be more important than superior tech.


Disclaimer:

1) Ryan McBeth is another pro neocon/neolib regime bot that supports US aggression and hegemony across the planet.

2) Just like the other neocon/neolib regime bots in Washington bots, he believes that the US must fight and win against China by 2027/2028.

3) He emphasizes that the US should use its vassal states and other cannon fodder to preserve US hegemony in Asia and across the planet.

4) Just like his neofascist brethren , McBeth considers Taiwan to be a country and that China has no legitimate claims over it.

Personal View:

A) These American Neofascists are making a terrible miscalculation if they think a fight against China will be just another Vietnam.

B) The neocon/neolib regime establishment in the US are making a tragic mistake if they think they can attack China and win. It would turn into the US' Operation Barbarossa at best or the destruction of human civilization as we know at worst.

Question: Will the neocon/neolib regime establishment initiate their war in 2027/2028 in order to preserve their dictatorship over the world or will they come to their senses (if they have any left) and refrain from initiating it?
 
proelite

proelite

Junior Member
GulfLander said:
Real or psyop? Will Modi really interfere on this matter?
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1930913166059356493
...
Google translated:


https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1930903310384439604
Click to expand...

If India sells to Taiwan, China should sell to Kashmir separatists.

sabiothailand said:
Weird, why don't Taiwan buy higher quality weapons from the US? Why are they now relying on Indian tech?
Click to expand...

US weapons are maybe 20% better than Indian ones and 100% more expensive. Numbers out of my ass but for sure bang for buck won't be surprised Indian weapons are better.
 
Last edited:
AssassinsMace

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
GulfLander said:
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1929623606562378089
Click to expand...
Frankly people should stop hyping up the Uighur terrorist threat. Yeah they’re killers but what makes them supermen from anyone else? It’s the psychology that they are is what makes any terrorist powerful when they’re most likely just a bunch of uneducated idiots. That’s what the US is trying to do against China. Does anyone really think the US is going to actually employ terrorists against China and advertise it? Like using terrorists is somehow fair and the US cannot be blamed for their actions? That’s the risk which also includes making it okay for any other country to employ terrorists against the US if they want to take that road.

Americans look at it through their own lens where terrorists get due process and are protected which is frustrating for them and they want China to experience that. All because they have to show the world that they care about human rights. If they don’t, the world doesn’t follow them. But they forget China will just shoot them down on the street like a rabid dog because they don’t care about human rights over there. That’s what makes terrorism so scary for Americans while in China it’s not the same. Also because Americans think their lives are so much more valuable than anyone else’s that there’s a paranoia that engulfs and paralyzes them because they don’t want to lose their precious life. Then they get angry because no one is doing anything to protect them blaming other people… blaming the politicians slowly eating away at their society. All that goes on with an American and that’s what they want to inflict on the Chinese because if they have to suffer it, they want the Chinese to suffer it as well.

That’s what the US is trying to do too wanting to make Chinese think they’re going to unleash the Japanese Empire on the Chinese so China better do what Americans say… Japanese weren’t special. They can be killed like any Chinese and today especially so. China has that capability and they know it. That’s what’s holding the Japanese back and Americans as well from unleashing their powerful military upon the world that they like to threaten because they’re actually as mortal as everyone else. They’re the ones afraid of losing their more important in their own eyes life that holds them back. That’s why terrorism doesn’t work as well on the Chinese like it does on Americans. Do you see terrorists around the world itching to target China like they do with the US? No, so don’t think like a conceited American.
 
M

Mt1701d

Junior Member
Registered Member
proelite said:
If India sells to Taiwan, China should sell to Kashmir separatists.
Click to expand...
There are many other targets to sell to or support, should China pursue such a policy, the Kashmir side is best left alone for PAK to deal with.

There are the Maoist, the east rebels beyond the chicken neck, the Sikhs etc. Causing problems elsewhere is far more effective as PAK can capitalise, thus saving resources.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top