Miscellaneous News

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Donald Trump Wants to 'Get Rid' of Nuclear Weapons​

President Donald Trump told reporters Thursday that he is in favor of denuclearization among global powers.

"It would be great if everybody would get rid of their nuclear weapons. I know Russia and us have by far the most," Trump said. "China will have an equal amount within 4-5 years. It would be great if we could all denuclearize because the power of nuclear weapons is crazy."

Trump's remarks come amid rising tensions between global superpowers, with the United States, Russia, and China all working to modernize and expand their nuclear capabilities.

This isn't the first time Trump has addressed the issue. In February, speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, he criticized the hundreds of billions of dollars being invested in rebuilding the U.S. nuclear deterrent. He also expressed hope of securing commitments from U.S. adversaries to reduce their spending.

"There's no reason for us to be building brand new nuclear weapons—we already have so many," Trump said. "You could destroy the world 50 times over, 100 times over. And here we are building new nuclear weapons, and they're building nuclear weapons."

Trump's comments align with his broader strategy to cut U.S. defense spending and redirect funds toward domestic priorities. He proposed initiating negotiations with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping, aiming to reduce military budgets significantly.

"One of the first meetings I want to have is with President Xi of China, President Putin of Russia. And I want to say, 'let's cut our military budget in half.' And we can do that. And I think we'll be able to," Trump said in February.

The call for renewed arms control talks echoes past efforts to bring China into nuclear agreements, a goal that eluded Trump during his first term when the U.S. and Russia negotiated an extension of the New START treaty. China has historically resisted these discussions, arguing that Washington and Moscow should scale back their arsenals before demanding cuts from Beijing.

While the U.S. and Russia have held massive stockpiles of weapons since the Cold War, Trump predicted that China would catch up in their capability to exact nuclear devastation "within five or six years."

However, despite Trump's desire to restart denuclearization efforts, some experts remain skeptical about the feasibility of such agreements. According to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, the U.S. is already spending $75 billion annually on nuclear modernization programs, with an estimated total of $1.7 trillion planned over the next 30 years.

Lucas Ruiz, a fellow with the Stimson Center, a Washington think tank focused on security issues, in a blog post: "The current modernization push is fueled by a pathology of nuclear superiority brinkmanship, which is accelerating a headlong rush into a new nuclear arms race and increasing the odds of a confrontation between nuclear powers."

Alistair Burnett, head of media for the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, told Newsweek: "President Trump has a long track record of talking about nuclear weapons and the threat they pose to humanity. He raised the issue several times during his election campaign last year, and several times since he became president, he has said he would like to talk to Russia and China about "denuclearization."

It's unclear when denuclearization talks may happen or whether China and Russia would be willing to consider these discussions.
Trump said. "China will have an equal amount within 4-5 years. It would be great if we could all denuclearize because the power of nuclear weapons is crazy."

Apparently, Trump thinks China is making a 1000 nuclear warheads per year.
 

GulfLander

Major
Registered Member
I'm honestly in awe at how China managed to maintain the perception of "neutral" to Europeans, despite Xi meeting with Putin twice a year to reaffirm the two country' unlimited partnership, how China and Russian defence ministers meet multiple times a year to talk about deep military cooperation, how Chinese drones are directly responsible for the destruction of 90% of all western vehicles and armour, and how China is the biggest contributor to collective west getting economically crushed.

There is enough for historians and psychologists to analyze for an entire department to be made.
Even Ukr seem to still doing business w CN (and vise versa since some claim before to have seen Ukr entities during HK r10ts b4?)

 

Biscuits

Colonel
Registered Member

just want to point out this comment which is bitingly insightful. White Americans, Anglos, atlanticists want war with China and believe it’ll be like desert storm and they won’t be drafted or if they do, it’s their chance to earn glory, escape the NEET life and kill Asians. Meanwhile, the despised Indians are going to move into their houses when they’re dead and maimed,
case eg Ukraine, when the war started all the Indians in Ukraine fled but the local Ukrainian men were the ones being led to slaughter.
In a way, this also mirrors corporate anglosphere where white boomer bosses inadvertently promote Indians over Chinese workers because they’re so threatened by Chinese men.
Western birthrates are higher than China because of immigrants. White westerners (exempt some groups like Mormons) have the same birthrates as Han Chinese.

So every fighting age white person drafted means another progress in the hindu/MENAization of NATO.

And because tyranny of distance + difference in national power, US will lose/draft a lot more men. Their only asset is quantity and only in terms of how big the starting army is.
MacArthur is famous for running the longest stretch in American history during the Korean war.

But what is less known about him is that he also ran from an under strength Imperial Japanese Army (at the time, less than 30% of Japan's forces were devoted to fighting US) in the Philippines, losing a whole country in the process.

Hopefully America doesn't send another MacArthur, but an American Syrsky... We don't want US to run away, we need them to send all the conscripts so every last one together with their associates can be denazified...
 

Africablack

Junior Member
Registered Member
I'm honestly in awe at how China managed to maintain the perception of "neutral" to Europeans, despite Xi meeting with Putin twice a year to reaffirm the two country' unlimited partnership, how China and Russian defence ministers meet multiple times a year to talk about deep military cooperation, how Chinese drones are directly responsible for the destruction of 90% of all western vehicles and armour, and how China is the biggest contributor to collective west getting economically crushed.

There is enough for historians and psychologists to analyze for an entire department to be made.
China doesn't have the perception of "neutral" to Europeans, due to the developing geopolitical situation they have no choice but to deal with the Chinese because they see them as the most stable and predictable of the big powers. I mean, who else are they going to turn to? India? lol!
 
Top