Over 66% gets refugee aproval... just convert to hard core christain, falung gong , post anti-ccp stuff... etc
I'm certain it will move out of US in the not so distant future. It should never have been in the US in the first place. America is not a neutral country to host such events and there is an existential danger to heads of states of hostile countries should they attend the General Assembly in NYC. USA is a known breaker of treaties, violator of international law, and executor of foreign leaders. It is not to be trusted in providing security to hostile foreign leaders. Forget the leaders, US has been implicated numerous times in spying on UN at NYC. The State Department, CIA, and NSA have spied not only on the UN but also on foreign diplomats attending UN GHQ, going as far as bugging devices.Then the UN HQ should be moved out of New York and to countries that truly abide by the UN cause.
I wouldn't mind Shanghai or Guangzhou hosting the UN HQ.
Olaf Scholz did not enjoy thisDon't think this was posted before, but this clip of Xi Jinping's procession through Paris earlier this week is pretty incredible.
A lousy attempt at deflecting. You've been arguing with me all this while that his conspiracy theory is sound. Did you even read what you wrote?You're arguing with yourself by miscomprehending.
I did not say the Brazilian journalist is right or wrong - you assume this.
This is childish armchair general talk. You talk as if you can qualify the Delilah missile as a nuclear strike weapon, capable of detonating a nuclear warhead at high altitude. When the facts run against you, you pluck out the old US W54 warhead and say: "See! I was right all along!". Do you know who amateurish you sound? It's like a dude saying that his brand new Honda Civic stock car can compete with a BMW M3 in street racing because his Honda has a turbocharged engine.The point is in refuting your claim that a small Delilah warhead is unsuitable for nuclear weapons delivery. The W54 M388 round was an example of a small, similar sized warhead capable of delivering a nuke. Like you said, an outdated weapon.. meaning, it shouldn't be difficult to manufacture.
LOL! You were not even comprehending what you were writing. You insist on supporting a conspiracy theory that has so little legs in it. When confronted with reasonable doubt, you turn into an amateur military fanboy and put forward childish arguments.Where do you keep getting these "must have" from? The amount of time you've attributed must to me is the textbook definition of assume.
*Comprehension has left the chat.*
Weren't they supposed to do this 2 years ago?I frankly don't really care about the name, I'm just watching with pop corn and watermelon.
LOL! The Wanwanese military needs porn for motivation, but the PLA only needs patriotism and duty to the motherland for motivation. This is not a sustainable fight in the long term.
Nope. I haven't. I repeatedly said I am posting media content, not insisting anything. Like I said, you have an issue in comprehension.A lousy attempt at deflecting. You've been arguing with me all this while that his conspiracy theory is sound. Did you even read what you wrote?
First ensure the as if is legitimate and not your mind playing tricks on you.This is childish armchair general talk. You talk as if
Nope. Did not say that. Comprehension problem on your part. I did imply, to refute your comment, that warhead size isn't a factor in whether it's nuclear or not. If you could make a 34kg nuclear warhead in the 1950s, why not a 30kg in 2020s?you can qualify the Delilah missile as a nuclear strike weapon, capable of detonating a nuclear warhead at high altitude. When the facts run against you, you pluck out the old US W54 warhead and say: "See! I was right all along!".
I know how randomly butthurt you sound.Do you know who amateurish you sound? It's like a dude saying that his brand new Honda Civic stock car can compete with a BMW M3 in street racing because his Honda has a turbocharged engine.
Did not insist that. Comprehension issue for you again.Why do you keep insisting that a Delilah missile can carry a W54 warhead to high altitude and detonate it over Iran?
8500m ceiling, as previously stated.Its just so amateurish. Do you even understand the flight performance of the Delilah?
Yup. I mentioned one earlier: the Popeye Turbo, in case you missed it in your mania. LolThere are much better alternatives in the Israeli Airforce arsenal for such a mission.
Who said anything about high altitude? See what poor comprehension does.I'll give you a hint: its not the Delilah. Another question to you. Do you even know the yield of the W54 warhead? Would detonating it over high altitude achieve your idea of an effective EMP attack over Iran?
Israel has access to more or less everything in US inventory.Does Israel have such a weapon, and why? Ask yourself these questions before you argue.
Oh, so you're gonna tell me now what I implied, contrary to what I've made clear repeatedly?LOL! You were not even comprehending what you were writing.
Nope. The only thing I insist is that you now learn what the word insist means before employing it.You insist on supporting a conspiracy theory that has so little legs in it. When confronted with reasonable doubt, you turn into an amateur military fanboy and put forward childish arguments.
LOL! You're really, really clueless! You don't even remember the conspiracy theory you're trying so hard to push. EMP high altitude blast, W54, Delilah, F-35 sacrificing stealth to launch Delilah, or Popeye Turbo. But no Jericho missile, because you don't like it. What the hell is all this? You're hopping all over the place to justify a stupid nuclear attack theory. Do you even know what you're talking about?Nope. I haven't. I repeatedly said I am posting media content, not insisting anything. Like I said, you have an issue in comprehension.
First ensure the as if is legitimate and not your mind playing tricks on you.
Nope. Did not say that. Comprehension problem on your part. I did imply, to refute your comment, that warhead size isn't a factor in whether it's nuclear or not. If you could make a 34kg nuclear warhead in the 1950s, why not a 30kg in 2020s?
I know how randomly butthurt you sound.
Did not insist that. Comprehension issue for you again.
8500m ceiling, as previously stated.
Yup. I mentioned one earlier: the Popeye Turbo, in case you missed it in your mania. Lol
Who said anything about high altitude? See what poor comprehension does.
Israel has access to more or less everything in US inventory.
Oh, so you're gonna tell me now what I implied, contrary to what I've made clear repeatedly?
Nope. The only thing I insist is that you now learn what the word insist means before employing it.
You are unnecessarily hostile, indicating a lack of maturity.