Miscellaneous News

Zhejiang

Junior Member
Registered Member
I believe TK3600 was referring to the United States and not China. The US is already pining for the another round of chaos elsewhere in the World. Since China is officially now their main adversary, NK, Taiwan and possibly SEA is likely to receive some good old fashion American "Freedom". In any case, I agree that China should wait as long as possible before using the Big Stick on Taiwan.
ah ok, and yeah China should wait as long as possible because time is on Chinas side, China will make more allies while the US fights over who becomes the next president.
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
I trust that China has things under control

I don't think that is how it works in this game.

The idea is to play your cards or tiles in mahjongg and play it well.

No one controls the battlefield.

Right now, all the United States wants to do is play toy soldier, and put more toy soldiers into place.

Well, one counter to that, is to double down on the diplomacy and economic incentives.

If one side is only interested in playing toy soldier, and the other side wants to make more deals, then it kind of becomes do you want to plan for war or do you want peace and prosperity?

Sometimes, it is not about some grand plan.

See what is happening, and play the obvious, and see how it works out.

For the United States to go around saying the BRI is bad, when everyone wants that infrastructure investment, aka development is bad, and the United States going around wanting to play toy soldier, aka war is good, not sure how successful that will be in the short run or long run.

They might get a couple of photographs.

But when the China Coast Guard blocks a Philippines re-supply run, total lip services from those who play toy soldier.

China Coast Guard blocking re-supply runs is consistent with stated CCP policy, for friends we got fine wine, for jackals we got shotguns.

:D
 

Zhejiang

Junior Member
Registered Member
That's certainly true. All the more reason to continue poisoning their populace and crippling their national strength if it means nothing will come of it.
lol, that would work but would also create more issues with China in other countries, maybe if they gave some to smugglers because theres already smugglers of it, that they blame China for. so not un ban it but give some to the smugglers
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
I agree about him taking news too seriously but he is right about Chinese foreign policy being too passive. For example, recently NED cooked up an anti-China hysteria in Thailand and got anti-China parties elected. What good is spending billions on BRI when you are unwilling to spend a few billion on cultivating friendly media and groups?
The US fights the way it does because it lacks the power within itself. China fights the way it does because China's greatest challenge is only to cultivate the power of the Chinese people and it will be unrivaled in the world. The US, through decades of dominance, has built specific tools for manipulating other countries. Chinese doesn't have these tools and it would be very tiring and ineffective for China to fight that fight. Your few billions will end up nowhere because "friendly media and groups" can be easily censored and destroyed by corrupt zombie politicians moving to America's puppet strings. China's fight is self-development; it's actually a much much easier goal than one that involves bribing/begging/threatening/manipulating others to compensate for lack of one's own power. It's the difference between training a genius kid to be a genius adult vs trying to get the whole community together to drag down someone else's genius kid and pretend that your drunken Down Syndrome boy is brilliant. I wouldn't trade a miniscule fraction of China's innate potential for all of America's dirty desperate tricks.
 

56860

Senior Member
Registered Member
lol, that would work but would also create more issues with China in other countries, maybe if they gave some to smugglers because theres already smugglers of it, that they blame China for. so not un ban it but give some to the smugglers
That's a cucked response. They're going to blame China no matter what happens. There's no point in holding back to preserve reputation. We're well past that point.
 

luminary

Senior Member
Registered Member

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
: Former Chief Justice of India​

Inter-caste marriages have become common even in India but the Indian community residing in the US is still stuck on the idea of caste superiority.

Mainland progresses socially while the overseas cling to the mindset and ways of the past. We Chinese definitely see a similar phenomenon.


Very clever strategy to only ban some, but not all Japanese prefectures.

Firstly, this reduces the supply drop and thus price pressure for Chinese consumers.

Secondly, this promotes conflict within Japan between those affected and those not affected, whereas if China blanket banned all Japanese seafood, it will ironically create a United front in Japan, since everyone there will be in the same boat.

Lastly and most importantly, this will create the market conditions to ensure Japanese people themselves end up eating the overwhelming majority of contaminated seafood since exporters will buy up as much of the seafood from non-banned areas as economically viable, while seafood from banned areas will plummet in price until eventually someone (local) is willing to eat it.
LMAO you are right they are pleading:

J
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Japan has made a strong request to Hong Kong officials not to tighten restrictions on food imports from Japan because of its plan to discharge treated radioactive water from its Fukushima nuclear plant, Tokyo's foreign ministry said on Wednesday.
 

Zhejiang

Junior Member
Registered Member
I don't think that is how it works in this game.

The idea is to play your cards or tiles in mahjongg and play it well.

No one controls the battlefield.

Right now, all the United States wants to do is play toy soldier, and put more toy soldiers into place.

Well, one counter to that, is to double down on the diplomacy and economic incentives.

If one side is only interested in playing toy soldier, and the other side wants to make more deals, then it kind of becomes do you want to plan for war or do you want peace and prosperity?

Sometimes, it is not about some grand plan.

See what is happening, and play the obvious, and see how it works out.

For the United States to go around saying the BRI is bad, when everyone wants that infrastructure investment, aka development is bad, and the United States going around wanting to play toy soldier, aka war is good, not sure how successful that will be in the short run or long run.

They might get a couple of photographs.

But when the China Coast Guard blocks a Philippines re-supply run, total lip services from those who play toy soldier.

China Coast Guard blocking re-supply runs is consistent with stated CCP policy, for friends we got fine wine, for jackals we got shotguns.

:D
my point was that i bet China has plan or is thinking of a plan when they got news of this.
 

Zhejiang

Junior Member
Registered Member
That's a cucked response. They're going to blame China no matter what happens. There's no point in holding back to preserve reputation. We're well past that point.
true, but i dont want China to lose more freinds, China has some in NATO trying to keep NATO in Euroupe, but your right the US would blame China no matter what.
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
I can only lol.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Didn't the Muricans reported that the Chinese people were asking for divine intervention because they are too worried about the economy just last month?

20230611_191428.jpg

So did Mikey meant that people in China are actually asking Xi Jinping for divine intervention in the Chinese economy because Xi is the God of China?

Make sense.
 
Last edited:
Top