Miscellaneous News

sinophilia

Junior Member
Registered Member
Russia out there already annexing or occupying parts of different countries for three decades (Transnistria, South Ossetia, Abkhazia, Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk), can you imagine if China was occupying half of Taiwan, then maybe Mongolia, some of Vietnam, a little of Myanmar, part of Kyrgyzstan, etc.?

There would already be a major war and the aggression against China would be 100x worse than it already is. China hasn't occupied any land that it didn't already have three decades ago (except at best a couple acres in the SCS), yet they are angrier with China than Russia. In fact, large parts of their populations, the most war-mongering and nationalist, actually SIDE with Russia over the US. Yet those same racist scum are always talking about sitting on a throne of Chinese skulls and the like. In fact, literally those exact *same* people. Like Tucker Carlson, who desperately wants to be an ally of Russia but for 'some reason' really wants to destroy China.

If that doesn't show everyone this conflict is pretty much just racial then nothing will. It seems White Privilege really does exist.

Funny coincidence, just saw a post perfectly encapsulating what I wrote. This is on The War Zone (largest military comments section in the US).

Not a single rebuttal of this clear race-war diatribe, because ultimately, this is what they all think. Not even the left-wing regulars took pause to what he wrote.

1643117081849.png

This was in response to someone publishing an article on the German admiral in India. And people here were actually applauding that guy... So naïve about the hatred the West has for non-whites. The only non-whites that have a right to exist are poor non-threatening minorities in "shithole countries" (as the US president stated a few years ago) or minorities in white-majority countries who are being Westernized and effeminized to the point where they will never be a threat to the white oligarchy.
 

clockwork

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Seven US Navy personnel were injured after a pilot suffered a “landing mishap” on a US supercarrier and was forced to eject from the aircraft while performing operations in the South China Sea.

The US Navy
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
on Monday that one of its F-35C Lightning II stealth planes had a “landing mishap on deck while USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) was conducting routine flight operations in the South China Sea.”

The pilot ejected from the aircraft and was rescued by a military helicopter. However, a total of seven sailors were injured during the incident, with three requiring a medical evacuation to the Philippines. The three sailors are reportedly in stable condition.

The other four injured sailors were treated aboard the ship and three have since been released.

Exactly what went wrong is currently being investigated by the US Navy authorities.

Navy supercarriers USS Carl Vinson and USS Abraham Lincoln were performing a drill in the South China Sea at the time of the accident as tensions between the US and China continue.

Rear Admiral Dan Martin, the commander of Carrier Strike Group 1,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
this week that the drill “highlights the U.S. Navy’s ability to deliver overwhelming maritime force, when called upon, to support a free and open Indo-Pacific region.”

“We are committed to ensuring the lawful use of the sea and free flow of commerce while deterring those who challenge the shared vision of a free and open Indo-Pacific now and into the long-term future,”
he continued.

Beijing has territorial claims to almost all of the South China Sea, and routinely denounces Washington’s operations in the area as a violation of its sovereignty. Several other nations, including Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, and the Philippines, also claim various islands in the disputed waterway.
Tbh it's remarkable we haven't heard of major incidents like this on Liaoning and Shandong with China being new to carrier ops. Am confident that'll continue with 003 now that they're no longer new.
 
Last edited:

clockwork

Junior Member
Registered Member
Funny coincidence, just saw a post perfectly encapsulating what I wrote. This is on The War Zone (largest military comments section in the US).

Not a single rebuttal of this clear race-war diatribe, because ultimately, this is what they all think. Not even the left-wing regulars took pause to what he wrote.

View attachment 81775

This was in response to someone publishing an article on the German admiral in India. And people here were actually applauding that guy... So naïve about the hatred the West has for non-whites. The only non-whites that have a right to exist are poor non-threatening minorities in "shithole countries" (as the US president stated a few years ago) or minorities in white-majority countries who are being Westernized and effeminized to the point where they will never be a threat to the white oligarchy.
You remember that they even sometimes took issue with Russia for not being white enough and this stuff is hardly shocking lmao.

E.g. Patton once said:
"The difficulty in understanding the Russian is that we do not take cognizance of the fact that he is not a European but an Asiatic and therefore thinks deviously. We can no more understand a Russian than a Chinaman or a Japanese and, from what I have seen of them, I have no particular desire to understand them except to ascertain how much lead or iron it takes to kill them."

I've always said that I think the religious (China being an atheist state) and racial reasons are roughly equal and far outweigh all other motivations in Westerners' attitude towards China (including obviously the stated ones like "values", opposition to their form of government etc.), glad others are starting to see it too.

This is also why I expect the confrontation with China to be even more rabid and intense than with the USSR because in the latter case really only the first reason was a factor; and even then only by state atheism, much of the Russian population were still Christians.
 
Last edited:

Maikeru

Captain
Registered Member
Tbh it's remarkable we haven't heard of major incidents like this on Liaoning and Shandong with China being new to carrier ops. Am confident that'll continue with 003 now that they're no longer new.
Sounds like a wire broke. Some speculation of deployment fatigue - US CVN's typically deploy for 6-8 months at a time.

Edit: Just to add that USN really works its crews. I read somewhere that the collisions of 2 DDG51s with merchant ships a few years ago may have been at least partly due to some crew members working ~100 hours per week.
 

BoraTas

Captain
Registered Member
Sounds like a wire broke. Some speculation of deployment fatigue - US CVN's typically deploy for 6-8 months at a time.

Edit: Just to add that USN really works its crews. I read somewhere that the collisions of 2 DDG51s with merchant ships a few years ago may have been at least partly due to some crew members working ~100 hours per week.
It is rarely talked about in mainstream media but the US Navy has very serious problems with crew fatigue, training, retention and the state of equipment. Almost all military blogs I follow that specialize on the US Navy mention this a lot. They get a lot of agreeing comments from former and current sailors too. Especially their surface force personnel spend 4-6 months every year deployed away from their families for no apparent reason. Ships do a lot of double deployments (two deployments without maintenance break in between) which wear down the equipment a lot. Their submarine force is fine though since they have 2 crews per submarine and don't conduct useless 6-month deployments without any maintenance breaks.
Really though what is the reason for the US Navy's global deployments?
 
Top