Miscellaneous News

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Lithuania is showing the world a way to resist China's growing pressure by diversifying supply chains and uniting with fellow democracies, the EU nation's foreign minister said Wednesday.

One of the smallest EU nations, Lithuania has been punching above its weight diplomatically by letting Taiwan open an office in its own name and, separately, welcoming the opposition from neighboring Belarus which says it won last year's election.

On a visit to Washington, Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis said he spoke to senior US officials on Lithuania's efforts to reduce reliance on China for supplies and called for longer-term efforts to help other nations facing pressure.

"I think that the biggest lesson out of Lithuania is that economic coercion does not necessarily mean that the country needs to step away from independent foreign policy decisions,"...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Lithuania will adapt to "short-term" economic pain dealt by China over its moves to enhance ties with Taiwan, foreign minister Gabrielius Landsbergis said on Wednesday, while urging Europe to brace against Beijing's economic "coercion" by getting more involved in the Indo-Pacific.

China downgraded diplomatic ties with Lithuania on Sunday over the Baltic country's move to allow self-ruled Taiwan to open a de facto embassy there. Lithuania has formal relations with China and not Taiwan.

Beijing views democratically-governed Taiwan as a province, and Lithuanian officials say China has also sought to inflict pain such as cutting trade links in retaliation for its decision...


--->It seems that this US vassal/satellite state in Europe has placed its bets on its Neocon/Neolib overlords in Washington DC.


What will China do ?
"What will China do?"
China will show the world way to withstand "Lithuania's withstanding", I say. :D

To each points that you highlighted:
  • China will unite with fellow "authoritarians", you know who that is.
  • China will not sacrifice its own interest for neglectable economic benefit (from Lithuania).
  • China will apply "long term" economic pain on Lithuania and anyone who may follow suit.
Lastly, I will add, confrontation is not the exclusive option of Lithuania, China has it too.
 
Last edited:

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
A study combining linguistic, genetic and archaeological evidence has traced the origins of the family of languages including modern Japanese, Korean, Turkish and Mongolian and the people who speak them to MILLET FARMERS who inhabited a region in Northeastern China about 9,000 years ago.

The findings detailed on Wednesday document [2021-11-10] a shared genetic ancestry for the hundreds of millions of people who speak what the researchers call Transeurasian languages across an area stretching more than 8,000 kilometers.

There are 98 Transeurasian languages. Among these are Korean and Japanese as well as: various Turkic languages including Turkish in parts of Europe, Anatolia, Central Asia and Siberia; various Mongolic languages including Mongolian in Central and Northeast Asia; and various Tungusic languages in Manchuria and Siberia.

This language family's beginnings were traced to Neolithic millet farmers in the Liao River Valley, an area encompassing parts of the Chinese provinces of Liaoning and Jilin and the region of Inner Mongolia. As these farmers moved across northeastern Asia, the descendant languages spread north and west into Siberia and the steppes and east into the Korean peninsula and over the sea to the Japanese archipelago over thousands of years.

"Accepting that the roots of one's language, culture or people lie beyond the present national boundaries is a kind of surrender of identity, which some people are not yet prepared to make," said comparative linguist Martine Robbeets, leader of the Archaeolinguistic Research Group at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Germany and lead author of the study published in the journal NATURE.

The researchers determined that farmers in Northeastern China eventually supplemented millet with rice and wheat, an agricultural package that was transmitted when these populations spread to the Korean peninsula by about 1300 BC and from there to Japan after about 1000 BC.

(...)

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



The linguistic relatedness of the Transeurasian languages -- also known as ‘Altaic’ -- is among the most disputed issues in linguistic prehistory. Transeurasian denotes a large group of geographically adjacent languages stretching across Europe and northern Asia, and includes five uncontroversial linguistic families: Japonic, Koreanic, Tungusic, Mongolic, and Turkic (Fig. 1a). The question of whether these five groups descend from a single common ancestor has been the topic of a long-standing debate between supporters of inheritance and borrowing. Recent assessments show that even if many common properties between these languages are indeed due to borrowing, there is nonetheless a core of reliable evidence for the classification of Transeurasian as a valid genealogical group.

In contrast to previously proposed homelands, which range from the Altai to the Yellow River to the Greater Khingan Mountains to the Amur basin, we find support for a Transeurasian origin in the West Liao River Region in the Early Neolithic [an area encompassing parts of the Chinese provinces of Liaoning and Jilin and the region of Inner Mongolia]. After a primary break-up of the family in the Neolithic, further dispersals took place in the Late Neolithic and Bronze Age. The ancestor of the Mongolic languages expanded northwards to the Mongolian Plateau, Proto-Turkic moved westwards over the eastern steppe and the other branches moved eastwards: Proto-Tungusic to the Amur–Ussuri–Khanka region, Proto-Koreanic to the Korean Peninsula and Proto-Japonic over Korea to the Japanese islands (Fig. 1b).

Around 3300 BP (Before Present), farmers from the Liaodong–Shandong area migrated to the Korean peninsula, adding rice, barley and wheat to millet agriculture. This migration aligns with the genetic component modelled as Upper Xiajiadian in our Bronze Age sample from Korea and is reflected in early borrowings between Japonic and Koreanic languages. Archaeologically it can be associated with agriculture in the larger Liaodong–Shandong area without being specifically restricted to Upper Xiadiajian material culture.

By advancing new evidence from ancient DNA, our research thus confirms recent findings that Japanese and Korean populations have West Liao River ancestry, whereas it contradicts previous claims that there is no genetic correlate of the Transeurasian language family.

(...)
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I've read that report. I do believe the finding in the report about the possible originating location. But I don't believe anything "altaic" and its derived ethno-linguistic relationship theories, especially the link between it and Japan. Even the link between Korea and Japan is far stretched.

To be honest, the concept of "altaic" is IMO a very political and nationalistic construct by the morden Turkish nationalism, besides trying to lump all historical nomadic populations in northern euroasian continent into one single group, there is not much scientific evidence to the concept. One can see that attempt by the word "Altaic", it is in reference to the Altai mountains in Northern Xinjiang where the original Ashina clan of Tujue arise. The modern turkish nationalists have tried hard to make a direct link of Turkey with Ashina Tujue, it is a national prestige thing. In reality how much connection could Ashina have with modern Turkish? Pretty small.

Here is the game that this concept is trying to play.
Mongol, Manchu, Japanese, Korean, Central Asian -> Altaic ->Altai -> Ashina-> Turkey (the heir to the glory).

The following photo perfectly illustrated the love by Turkish nationalists' bloated "altaic" concept. It is a joke of pretending to be the son of a VIP.
1637949645046.png
 

NiuBiDaRen

Brigadier
Registered Member
this voting pattern on Xinjiang in 2020. red and blue map. Turk people take cues from Germanic people. there is no China in it.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
It's about Central Asian elites. The elites in Central Asia control the countries and natural resources. The ordinary folk may be against China but they are powerless lol
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I wonder the extent to which Central Asian elites are beholden to China because of natural gas and trade connections
Have you heard this
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
lead by Turkey, or
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
a US initiative by H. Clinton?

Essentially, everybody is trying to gain influence. It is investment and culture exchange that make people choose. So it is not the elites are beholden to China specifically, they are beholden to everybody including Turkey and US as well.

The article worth nothing more than trying to make the Russians feel resentment to China's influence, a trick that the west is always doing, India and Turkey as well.

I am usually sceptical to all articles "flattering" China's clout abroad by pitting China against non-western countries especially the articles from western leaned platforms. It is called "高级黑", roughly translated as "sophisticated sabotaging", or "糖衣炮弹" = "sugare coated poison (canon ball)", or "抬轿子" = "hold you high in order to crash you hard".
 
Last edited:

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Low on Jomon features. You can't really find Takeshi Kaneshiro or Hiroshi Abe's features in Han.

Or Shinzo Abe and Moon Jae In. Their features are very... Altaic?

View attachment 79399

View attachment 79400


Kim Ji Won and Ayaka Miyoshi have these 'Altaic' features which are rare in Han population
View attachment 79401
View attachment 79403

It's almost as though they have some Hungarian features
I seen this face everyday I would say they are closest to peranakan Chinese rounder eye deep seated eye Not surprising since Japanese gene include Ryu Kyu which is Austronesian Peranakan Chinese is mixture of Han and Austronesian but only 20% Add that Malay 10% it become 30% the same as Japanese. But 70% of Japanese gene are from people in Central China close to han
1637963766582.png
The modern Japanese has even larger Han like gene than the Kofun Japanese not surprising since there are large immigration of Han Chinese mostly from Fujian province. There is very small Jomon gene in Japanese the Okinawan is more pronounce
1637963980036.png

Look at this video they are both Chinese one of them is Cantonese with slitty eye and flat face and the other is peranakan with rounder eye and more chisel face
 
Top