Schhhh. Remember Naepolian's words. Something about Never interrupt.......... And mistakes and all that. Lol
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
Schhhh. Remember Naepolian's words. Something about Never interrupt.......... And mistakes and all that. Lol
This seems a rookie mistake. I don’t think Pompeo would make this.
Say what you like about fat, we lie, we cheat, we stole Pomp. But he sure won't make a mistake like this.
broadsword
Brigadier
It seems Pomp stole the $6,000 whisky.
Well, they would say what's the concern? If you're clear and clean of child pornographic materials then you should be worry free. What's the big deal? Unless of course people arguing against Apple's recent action is for child pornography.
Which countries in Asia have western colonisers today? I can think of Singapore, Hong Kong, not many other Asian countries. Both are city states and not really countries though.
Africa and South America is different of course.
solarz
Brigadier
They're matching your files hashes against a known database of child porn hashes.
This means:
- Your files are not truly encrypted, since everyone files uses the same encryption or hash algorithm, otherwise this wouldn't even work.
- The user is put into a position of having to prove their innocence. There can and will be plenty of false positives, and they will shut down your account. It would be up to you then to prove that you're not a pedophile.
- Theres no transparency on what would constitute child porn. Maybe you have some naked baby pics of your kids and that would trigger the algorithm. You would then need to prove to a complete stranger that these aren't child porn pictures in order to get your account back. What if you have some very personal pictures on your device that gets flagged? Would you need to show those pics to a stranger to prove your innocence?
Hosted at the opulent four-star Omni Shoreham hotel in Washington, DC (the first conference hosted there since the start of the coronavirus pandemic), the hottest topic at the summit — dubbed the “Davos of religious freedom” by co-chair Sam Bronback — was regime change and Balkanization in China. The affair laid bare the true aims of the human rights industrial complex and featured the majority of the network working to bring down Beijing. Russia and China were frequently invoked as evildoers against religious believers, and terms like “genocide” and “never again” were tossed around casually.
The event was a rare, unvarnished glimpse into the moral hypocrisy of Democratic Party leaders, showcasing their willingness to ally with those they claim to otherwise oppose ostensibly in the name of protecting "religious freedom," a concept which these ruling class factions can't even agree on a common definition of — even if ultimately it was all just cover for advancing an imperial agenda against a rising superpower.
The event was a rare, unvarnished glimpse into the moral hypocrisy of Democratic Party leaders, showcasing their willingness to ally with those they claim to otherwise oppose ostensibly in the name of protecting "religious freedom," a concept which these ruling class factions can't even agree on a common definition of — even if ultimately it was all just cover for advancing an imperial agenda against a rising superpower.
Thank you for a thorough reply. I appreciate your time and effort for doing so, and I learned a lot.