JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread

Totoro

Major
VIP Professional
The JF17 really need at least one, but preferably two intake mounted mini hardpoints for pods as a priority.

It is a lighter fighter with few enough hardpoints as it is without sacrificing some for pods.

it's a small plane, not easy to add hardpoints. Granted, there are examples of similarly small planes, such as Gripens, that have them. But there are also examples such as the larger Eurofighter, which too uses the centerline hardpoint for targeting pod.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
it's a small plane, not easy to add hardpoints. Granted, there are examples of similarly small planes, such as Gripens, that have them. But there are also examples such as the larger Eurofighter, which too uses the centerline hardpoint for targeting pod.

I would argue it needs pod hardpoints precisely because it is a small fighter.

The likes of the Eurofughter and Rafale have over a dozen hardpoints, so using a couple for pods is going to have a far smaller impact on storeage capacity.

But even for medium weight fighters, the Rafale has dedicated pod hardpoints also, and the main reason the Eurofigher doesn’t is because it has semi-recessed missile hardpoints in the best place for pods already.
 

[email protected]

Junior Member
Registered Member
Advance targeting pod by Turkish OEM
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
called ASELPOD is now operational with Pakistan Air Force's JF-17 Thunder fighters. It is a 4th generation piece of equipment which greatly enhances all weather ground and sea attack capabilities.

DYzVEL2W4AAEioA.jpg


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

for the underlined part
upload_2018-3-24_19-52-36.png
 

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
I honestly thought that targeting pod for Block III

This is very good news !

No longer need to rely on F16 for high value precision targeting
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Hi,

The Aselpod weighs around 240Kg---so---it might not be an easy job to mount a hard point under the nose---.

The J10’s intake hardpoints can carry 250kg at least, it should be perfectly feasible to reinforce the JF17 intake structure enough to take a similar hardpoints.

If they can add one to each side, that would be even better. Although being air superiority primarily, maybe the PAF don’t want to take the extra weight and performance hit from the structural reinforcement for both intakes and just opt to do one side.

Although I do wonder if the PAF should not instead look at the wide array of UCAVs on offer from China as a precision strike alternative to potentially risking having the JF17 go through a similar weight gain and agility performance hit as the F16s did when they went from air superiority to multirole, despite the continuing engine uprating.
 
Top