D
Deleted member 675
Guest
The Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force's latest "helicopter destroyer" (and first real helicopter carrier), "Hyuga", was launched today!
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: JMSDF 16DDH Carrier Takes shape
Here are some pics (click on the thumbnails):
Hehehe...only the Japanese would call that a destroyer...and clearly purely for political purposes IMHO. With the PARS and with a 16 cell VLS carrying ESSMs, that's 64 ESSMs for self defense, and two 20mm Phalanx CIWS, they will be well defended...and probably never out of company of at least one Kongo. Embarked with a Kongo and an Atago along with a couple of other JMSDF DDGs, they will form a very impressive helo strike group.
Well, they've launched her Obi Wan. A very impressive vessel...nice lines and a lot more capability than advertised.
Here are some pics (click on the thumbnails):
Hehehe...only the Japanese would call that a destroyer...and clearly purely for political purposes IMHO. With the PARS and with a 16 cell VLS carrying ESSMs, that's 64 ESSMs for self defense, and two 20mm Phalanx CIWS, they will be well defended...and probably never out of company of at least one Kongo. Embarked with a Kongo and an Atago along with a couple of other JMSDF DDGs, they will form a very impressive helo strike group.
More pics:
Only the Japanese would call that a destroyer...and clearly purely for political purposes IMHO. With the PARS and with a 16 cell VLS carrying ESSMs, that's 64 ESSMs for self defense, and two 20mm Phalanx CIWS, they will be well defended...and probably never out of company of at least one Kongo. Embarked with a Kongo and an Atago along with a couple of other JMSDF DDGs, they will form a very impressive helo strike group.
Tasman
Junior Member
Re: JMSDF 16DDH Carrier Takes shape
She is certainly a long way from the early destroyers of the WW1 era. I suppose it will perform one of the traditional destroyer functions of screening the fleet against submarine attack!
Tas
She is certainly a long way from the early destroyers of the WW1 era. I suppose it will perform one of the traditional destroyer functions of screening the fleet against submarine attack!
Tas
D
Deleted member 675
Guest
Just as the Invincibles were first called "through-deck cruisers" - of course it's politics, though not something we should go into for obvious reasons!
Absolutely. They'll probably form the core of any future MSDF taskgroups.
Re: JMSDF 16DDH Carrier Takes shape
Imagine an extremely powerful SAG/Sea control force with these vessels. Seven vessels consisting of a Hyuga (one of these), a Kongo, an Atago, and two each of Takanami and Murasami DDGs. Add a couple of Osumis and you have a fairly powerful Amphibious assault group too.
Here's pictures of each:
IMHO, the JMSDF is really stepping things up in the western Pacific. Soon they would be able to field two of these groups, either way (SAG/Sea Control or Amphibious Assault, and the launch of these new Hyuga carriers is making a large statement to that effect.
No doubt she will use her helos for that purpose. She is also a very powerful Command and control centerpiece.
Imagine an extremely powerful SAG/Sea control force with these vessels. Seven vessels consisting of a Hyuga (one of these), a Kongo, an Atago, and two each of Takanami and Murasami DDGs. Add a couple of Osumis and you have a fairly powerful Amphibious assault group too.
Here's pictures of each:
IMHO, the JMSDF is really stepping things up in the western Pacific. Soon they would be able to field two of these groups, either way (SAG/Sea Control or Amphibious Assault, and the launch of these new Hyuga carriers is making a large statement to that effect.
Re: JMSDF 16DDH Carrier Takes shape
The Hyuga was named after the battleship Hyuga, an Ise class battleship that was later converted into a hybrid carrier/battleship in 1944. Since this ship is not really a "carrier" and not really a destroyer but a "hybrid", is Japan telling the world something? If the second one is named ISE, the other Hybrid battleship, then that could be it. Maybe the follow on class will be named Akagi and Kaga.
The Hyuga was named after the battleship Hyuga, an Ise class battleship that was later converted into a hybrid carrier/battleship in 1944. Since this ship is not really a "carrier" and not really a destroyer but a "hybrid", is Japan telling the world something? If the second one is named ISE, the other Hybrid battleship, then that could be it. Maybe the follow on class will be named Akagi and Kaga.
Well, with these vessels, the JMSDF will be able to put to sea a very credible SAG/Sea Control task force with a Hyuga, a Atago, a Kongo, and a couple of each Takanamis and Murasamis. Very powerful indeed.
If you add in two Osumis, then you have a very credible Amphibious Task force as well.
The JMSDF is really stepping things up in the Western Pacific. Very few navies have the modern capabilities, the numbers, or the experience that they have. We're glad to have them as allies.
Re: JMSDF 16DDH Carrier Takes shape
Of course, their constitution says otherwise...but what they are putting in the water makes its own statement, the written words notwithstanding. Other nations recognize this.
That's a good point. Let's see what number two is christened. Clearly, with these vessels, and the other modern and capable combatants they have built, whatever else, the JMSDF is making a large statement in WestPac. The capabilities are becoming such that you could take the "SD" letters out of their JMSDF.
Of course, their constitution says otherwise...but what they are putting in the water makes its own statement, the written words notwithstanding. Other nations recognize this.
Re: JMSDF 16DDH Carrier Takes shape
You've raised a good point. When HMS Invincible was ordered she was still being referred to as a 'Through Deck Cruiser/ Command Cruiser' rather than a carrier and she was named after a WW1 Battlecruiser instead of recieving a carrier name. The second unit was nearly named HMS Lion but by then there was growing acceptance that the class were carriers, and the second and third units recieved carrier names (Illustrious and Indomitable, later changed to Ark Royal). The new CVFs Queen Elizabeth and Prince of Wales do not have traditional carrier names either, but the reasoning is again more political than naval. If the Japanese ships had recieved traditional carrier names (eg Kaga, Akagi, Hiryu, Soryu, Shokaku, Zuikaku... you get the gist) then that would have been a very unambiguous political statement about the true nature of the ships, but by taking the path they have they can emphasise the 'non carrier nature' or at least 'not a true carrier' aspect whilst giving a knowing look to those of us watching from the sidelines.
You've raised a good point. When HMS Invincible was ordered she was still being referred to as a 'Through Deck Cruiser/ Command Cruiser' rather than a carrier and she was named after a WW1 Battlecruiser instead of recieving a carrier name. The second unit was nearly named HMS Lion but by then there was growing acceptance that the class were carriers, and the second and third units recieved carrier names (Illustrious and Indomitable, later changed to Ark Royal). The new CVFs Queen Elizabeth and Prince of Wales do not have traditional carrier names either, but the reasoning is again more political than naval. If the Japanese ships had recieved traditional carrier names (eg Kaga, Akagi, Hiryu, Soryu, Shokaku, Zuikaku... you get the gist) then that would have been a very unambiguous political statement about the true nature of the ships, but by taking the path they have they can emphasise the 'non carrier nature' or at least 'not a true carrier' aspect whilst giving a knowing look to those of us watching from the sidelines.