J-35 carrier fighter (PLAN) thread

by78

General
Nice magazine scans.

54834534958_3a5c4eb7fa_o.jpg

54834516454_883308c88d_o.jpg
54834609100_6e4fe590f0_o.jpg

54834282776_0446fecb64_o.jpg
 

Clango

Just Hatched
Registered Member
J-35A's nozzles (top) vs J-35's nozzles (bottom).

54834282416_9464853eb2_o.jpg
Wonder if it's for reliability reasons that they want to put WS21s on the J35s for now, maybe if and when it gets naval certified the J35s would also get WS19s to not have the J35 be like 40 kN behind on thrust
 

lcloo

Major
So what do you think? Is my gut-feeling totally wrong?
Very hard to say. I am still not sure as well, though it does looked like the hump is extra longer but then the video is blur and sunlight reflection could play some trick on the visibility of the top height of the glass canopy.

Once my lectucter said, "if in doubt, give it the benefit of doubt". So, tentatively I will say yes, the hump back does look longer but we need clear photo to be abosolutely sure.
 
Top