Those are excellent pictures. Are they taken by official sources?
I can't see your picture.
To add a picture to your post:
1. Go to a free hosting service (i.e. imgur.com, imageshack.com, photobucket.com, or tinypic.com). Personally, I prefer IMGUR.com. Anyway, type "IMGUR.com" to go to their home page.
2. Click on "browse" button.
3. Select picture to upload from your computer onto the hosting service.
4. Copy and then Paste url link to your picture for "message boards" on IMGUR.com. The procedure is similar on Imageshack. I've used both and IMGUR.com is a lot faster and easier.
Good luck. If you have any questions, just leave a message here.
Those are excellent pictures. Are they taken by official sources?
From educated men on Stealth issues (I really mean just Carlo Kopp), the T-50 should have about -20 dbsm all aspect RCS, which equates to about .001 m2
The F-22 is known to have about a -40 dbsm all aspect RCS, which equates to about .00001 m2
I think we can all agree that the J-20 looks more like a F-22 than a T-50 and we can all agree that the J-20 is also relatively bigger than the F-22?
Before I say my estimate, I'll state where I am on the credential bar.
1-100, where 1 is someone who know this from playing Call of Duty and 100 is someone who designed the stuff, I'd be about a 20, I've talked to some people who are in the 70s (Engineers and learned men), so I'm not that far away from idiot.
Anyways, I'd guess that the J-20 would have a RCS similar to the of the F-35, about .001 m2 Frontal and .001 everywhere else.
Don't shoot me.
Regarding the engine, take note that an engine designer was ceremoniously awarded by President Hu Jin Tao just before the first flight of the J-20. Are they trying to tell us that the engine development is way better than what some would like to make it out to be?