It also potentially means that the range at which a J20 can detect and hit a Block 20 F22 exceeds the range at which the F22 can detect and hit the J20.That statement makes it seem that the only reason why the 2008 vintage Increment 2 F-22 is not competitive against the J-20 is its outdated AIM-120C-7 AMRAAM with a range of 105km. Either the US is confident in being able to track the J-20 at ranges where AIM-120D is relevant (160km+) or the AIM-120C variant seeker struggles against VLO targets.
Possible. The J-20 has IRST and a bigger radar.It also potentially means that the range at which a J20 can detect and hit a Block 20 F22 exceeds the range at which the F22 can detect and hit the J20.
Possible datalink advantage, too. I may be wrong but afiak the block 20 F22 still has only limited link 16 capabilities (and IFDL, but that is a whole new can of worms), which is a far cry from what we've heard concerning the J-20.Possible. The J-20 has IRST and a bigger radar.
I remember a particularly stupid article questioning if the J-20's landing gear could retract.These kind of statements are however useful as receipts in recounting articles like this where J-20 was viewed even by the Chief of Staff of the USAF at the time as only comparable to the F-117 because of its supposed sensing and networking, let alone the many articles in pop-defense and think tankland about J-20 in years past.
How does that compare to J20's competitors, threats, and targets?
I saw this but I can't find any recent CCTV that was saying this.
Zhuhai:maximum Operating MachThat's not possible. Official specs at Zhuhai airshow clearly states Mach 2.0. High Mach speeds approach M3.0 is not practic