J-15 carrier fighter thread

Alfa_Particle

Senior Member
Registered Member
This was posted over at SPF, said to feature PL-15 and an improved PL-10?

View attachment 178105
A wider version of this magazine scan without the wingtips out of frame, showing the PL-10s.

As I understand it, this has not been posted yet.

View attachment 178100
张之洞 is saying that this is the 1518. As for how he can ascertain that, I have no clue. There's not a singular discernable feature here afaik that supports that assertion. The only way you can be sure is via insider confirmation, which, I sincerely doubt that's the case here.

He also wrote some brief information on the upgraded PL-10(A?) in the post:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

mack8

Senior Member
Presumably, since we can see it on the J-15T, the improved PL-10A is already integrated into other platforms such as J-20, J-16, J-10C etc.?
 

bsdnf

Senior Member
Registered Member
The shape of the seeker has indeed changed, but it's uncertain whether it's been replaced with an AESA (because the IR window isn't visible), as this could be a counterweight missile
1-20120G51J62a.jpg7223594bgy1if2fzonbccj208q05ut8q.jpg

counterweight missile is more rudimentary than a training round, since training rounds also have infrared seeker.
71038d1dgy1hai595h42kj21d60id76y.jpg
 
Last edited:

F=XX Corsair

Junior Member
Registered Member
Couldn't it be related to this one? It appears longer with a slightly sharper tip though.

Seems I missed it but stumbled across it again lately, but is there a conclusion on this missile? It looks like being based on the PL-10 IR-guided AAM, but this one features a radar-seaker. I think back then it was discussed if it could be some sort of PL-10RF like the MICA-RF.

PL-10RF maybe - 1 XL.jpegPL-10RF maybe - 2.jpeg
 

bsdnf

Senior Member
Registered Member
张之洞 is saying that this is the 1518. As for how he can ascertain that, I have no clue. There's not a singular discernable feature here afaik that supports that assertion. The only way you can be sure is via insider confirmation, which, I sincerely doubt that's the case here.

He also wrote some brief information on the upgraded PL-10(A?) in the post:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The serial number is faintly visible on the air intake as xxxx14, while the serial number of the 1518 is 010014.
7223594bgy1if2fznwu08j21uo18ltra.jpg
14.jpg
 

Blitzo

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
The serial number is faintly visible on the air intake as xxxx14, while the serial number of the 1518 is 010014.
View attachment 178132
View attachment 178133

There is no reason to believe the airframe launching with the 4x YJ-83K and two PL-10s on wingtips is the same airframe as this picture (the absence of YJ-83Ks).

Of course, we cannot rule out the possibility that they "might" be the same airframe (maybe it is landing after doing ejection/drop tests of the YJ-83Ks), but we also can't assume it as likely.

Overall, we should defer to the least exciting answer: if the image of the J-15T with four YJ-83Ks is powered by WS-10s, then without clear imagery of whether it is a production aircraft or not, we should assume it is not a production aircraft and instead is a prototype like 1518.
 

siegecrossbow

Field Marshall
Staff member
Super Moderator
张之洞 is saying that this is the 1518. As for how he can ascertain that, I have no clue. There's not a singular discernable feature here afaik that supports that assertion. The only way you can be sure is via insider confirmation, which, I sincerely doubt that's the case here.

He also wrote some brief information on the upgraded PL-10(A?) in the post:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

He has a non answer in the thread saying that he just “has a way of knowing”. I’d say we take this assertion with a grain of salt.
 
Top