Infantry Combat Equipment (non-firearm): Vests, Body Armor, NVGs, etc.

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Those plate carriers are way too big. I would hate to wear those and try sitting around in those. It looks like they all got a standard one fits all size and they weren’t able to pick out their sizes? Or is that just their SOP? I’m 5’9 and 170 lbs and a medium SAPI feels uncomfortable to me.

It’s funny to see these photos because they have all of their high speed gear but the goggles are just too funny.

Where’s the comm gear/ear pro? Also what’s the point of those NODs when they don’t have IR/IFF strobes and IR illuminator on their weapons?

Do they not use have combat shirts/pants? Are those the standard flag patches or the camo/IR versions?

Lol this is the PLA, it's a big event when a soldier is equipped with both a semi sensible plate carrier and a rifle that has an optic installed.

Those are digital NODs and to my knowledge are not intended to be used with IR illuminators on weapons. I'm not even sure if those NODs are even meant to practically enable night shooting without an actual dedicated thermal scope on a weapon.
 

Tiberium

Junior Member
Registered Member
Lol this is the PLA, it's a big event when a soldier is equipped with both a semi sensible plate carrier and a rifle that has an optic installed.

Those are digital NODs and to my knowledge are not intended to be used with IR illuminators on weapons. I'm not even sure if those NODs are even meant to practically enable night shooting without an actual dedicated thermal scope on a weapon.
The inside joke of these digital NODs is “走路辅助器”, walking aid kit, which means its primary use is not for combat but generally movement at night
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
These digital night vision monocles cost at most $3-500 each, probably a lot less. A decent civilian IR laser and illuminator can easily cost over $600 to over a thousand.

But the biggest factor above even cost as to why the PLA are not issuing IR lasers and strobes en mass is because their opfor are not farmers with museum piece AKs only

If you are running against opfor with NV capabilities, you have to radically change your game in terms of IR discipline.

The PLA seems to be side stepping that by going pure passive night vision for their general infantry while reserving the active stuff for special forces only.

For proper night fighting, I would expect them to use their digital NODs for general night time movement while running night vision and thermal weapons scopes for shooting. They will probably have scouts and select members of squads who will be issued with proper tubed NODs for recon and situational awareness.

PS, digital night vision absolutely can pick up IR lasers.
 
Last edited:

drowingfish

Junior Member
Registered Member
The inside joke of these digital NODs is “走路辅助器”, walking aid kit, which means its primary use is not for combat but generally movement at night
you do understand that that is essentially the case of any NVG right? 90% of what an infantry soldier does is essentially walking and waiting. if this NVG can get them to a place at night without tripping and making too much noise, then it is sufficient.
 

externallisting

New Member
Registered Member
As the branch least funded in the PLA overall, I don't find it particularly surprising there is a dearth of updates besides a new rifle and better kit.

I'm keen to see how/when/if we start seeing IVAS kind things on CCTV(number - 9?)

Like other things, we don't, won't know until we do most the time.

I think NVG isn't quite the "game changer" (I really, really hate the term) people assume it to be. But I think something like IVAS in proper implementation might be.

Sooner see a new tank..
 

by78

General
Tundra/arid camouflage in its natural environment.

52362132837_e8ed744b7f_k.jpg
52363512000_bc17859f3e_k.jpg
 
Top