Infantry Combat Equipment (non-firearm): Vests, Body Armor, NVGs, etc.

LawLeadsToPeace

LawLeadsToPeace

Senior Member
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Registered Member
AZaz09dude said:
View attachment 75690

So the competition shooter who has been helping train the PLA team for some of the events in the upcoming army games has confirmed two long speculated issues regarding the current iteration of the QBZ-191:

1. The top rail on the handguard portion is made of polymer, making it difficult for any optics/lasers mounted on it to hold zero.

2. The grippod with integrated push to talk is absurdly cumbersome to the point where it negatively affects the speed of mag changes.

These problems are superficial ones easily fixed by removing/swapping out components. However, due to the nature of the PLA, most units are just going to use what they get so these problems might linger for who knows how long. And for the handguard, it's definitely going to take some time for 3rd party alternatives to start popping up and entering service in meaningful numbers if the ACP and Defender rails for the 95 series is anything to go by.

Overall, aside from some apparent complaints over the new handguns, the small arms of project 1224 seems to be relatively successful. At least when compared to the new gear where, based on the postings of those who've used it, it seems like most of the components range from "workable but made some questionable design choices" (eg the new helmets) to "mediocre with notable issues" (new standard issue body armor/vest system) to "absolute garbage" (the new drop leg holster)

Hopefully the trend of "自购强军" continues to grow and creates more competition to innovate
Click to expand...
For the helmets, what are the questionable design issues that the users noticed?
 
by78

by78

General
Better versions of previously shared images.

51360247912_dfd0e6366f_o.jpg

51360247932_a0f5c07141_o.jpg

51361006426_80e491d959_o.jpg
 
A

AZaz09dude

Junior Member
Registered Member
LawLeadsToPeace said:
For the helmets, what are the questionable design issues that the users noticed?
Click to expand...
Biggest issue is the helmet suspension being attached to the external plastic frame, which is more fragile and prone to breaking compared to traditional helmet designs. Other minor ones include having yet another different NVG/Eyepiece whatever mount and the high cut version lacking an ARC rail to mount headsets on (it seems they did have a design with it, but justified the removal by going with an in ear design for the new headsets. However there's still plenty of units actively running self purchased FAST clones with headsets mounted on the ARC rail...)
 
Saru

Saru

Junior Member
Registered Member
Some more images of the NVG and another picture Im Uncertain of wether if its demonstrated look rather than what gear will be issued to infrantry men.

Last 3 Nvgs Images.

0071SbYFly1gt7ygg7mgmj30mn14aq6e.jpg
0071SbYFly1gt7ygbwhpkj30u0140tep.jpg
0071SbYFly1gt7ygcarcsj30u01407az.jpg

Gear Demonstration sharws by Bloodwing.

0071SbYFly1gt78bjczh9j32c03407wi.jpg
 
T

TheFoozyOne

New Member
Registered Member
they are wear
Saru said:
Some more images of the NVG and another picture Im Uncertain of wether if its demonstrated look rather than what gear will be issued to infrantry men.

Last 3 Nvgs Images.

View attachment 75786
View attachment 75787
View attachment 75788

Gear Demonstration sharws by Bloodwing.

View attachment 75789
Click to expand...
Saru said:
Interesting images of Special Force Unit equipped with High quality expensive gear, Seemingly there will also be new NVG model unless Im mistaken.

SOF Gear.

View attachment 75780View attachment 75781View attachment 75782

The NVG's

View attachment 75783
View attachment 75784
View attachment 75785
Click to expand...
Are they wearing their body armor too low? It’s supposed to cover your chest/heart right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top