Hong-Kong Protests

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Liu Rushi earned her a place among the eight ladies through her literary talents. She married the 51 years old Qian Qianyi, a leading figure in literary circles, when she was only 20 years old. As the Qing army advanced towards Beijing, Liu Rushi supported her husband’s opposition of the invaders. When the Qing army arrived at Nanjing, Liu urged her husband die for the country by diving into the river together, but Qian declined because he could not jump into cold water. Later, Qian surrendered to the Qing government and even served in an official position. Liu, on the other hand, continued to support and fund the opposition to the Qing army. In the end, Qian felt too ashamed to maintain his position and returned home after resigning.
 

KYli

Brigadier
That's because it was part of the handover agreement. China didn't want the UK giving HKers British nationality because it would conflict with its stance of rejecting dual-nationality. If HKers could have full British nationality and Chinese passports, that would mean the CCP was recognising dual-nationality.

It is funny how you could rewrite the history by manipulating information. If I were not a HKer, I probably would fail to recognize the lies and twisted facts within your narrative. People in HK understood that it is unrealistic to ask UK to grant citizenship to all HKers. Hong Kong people only asked the British to grant them a way to immigrant to UK. And British has denied even this simple request. In the end, only a few people met the stingy requirements and threshold to immigrant to UK and most of them are privileges and high ranking officials who served in the Hong Kong government.


They'll be extremely useful from now on.

That's a pipe dream that I have heard for 3 decades. I am still waiting for the day that this so called BNO passport to become truly useful.

Those who can leave HK and thrive in US, UK, Canada, Australia have already done so. Those who can't leave or were forced to return don't stand a chance. Those who stayed are the ones that have no plan to leave. After all these decades, the West is still selling the same snake oil.
 

EtherealSmoke

New Member
Registered Member
This Hong Kong exodus brain drain narrative is ridiculously exaggerated. The wealthy have long been able to buy overseas residencies and citizenships through investor visas, while top students and professionals have already had access to talent schemes and work visas.

These new citizenship pathways are mainly appealing to young, unestablished types further down the socioeconomic spectrum. And guess what, that’s just the socioeconomic group struggling the world over with too much competition, facing increasingly high costs amid stagnating wage growth and underemployment!

I can imagine Beijing and the HK establishment secretly actually quite happy to rid their hands of the HK share.
 

supercat

Major
UK politicians are really a cunning bunch. Ever wondered why they would support the clown Guaido and his puppet "exile government" instead of the democratically elected legitimate leader of the Venezuela Maduro? Because they want to keep Venezuela's gold in the Bank of England.

On the other hand, anyone who thinks the U.S. was not involved in the Hong Kong's riots is either naive or ignorant. Anyone who takes even a cursory look of the following article will understand that why the National Security Law is needed and why it's needed now.
US has been exposed for funding last year’s Hong Kong protests
  • The little-known but powerful US Agency for Global Media has financed protesters in the city and helped them with technical support
Imagine how the American government would react if multiple Chinese state agencies such as Xinhua were exposed secretly helping protest groups across the United States to evade surveillance and crackdowns by law enforcement agencies.

Washington would probably threaten China with war. Roughly, though, the little-known but powerful US Agency for Global Media has been doing just that in Hong Kong. It oversees funding for various news and information operations around the world, including Voice of America and Radio Free Asia.

About US$2 million was earmarked for the protest movement in Hong Kong, but has now been frozen as part of a general overhaul and restructuring by a new agency boss. An ally of President Donald Trump, CEO Michael Pack didn’t specifically target the Hong Kong funding, which was apparently caught up in his management overhaul.

The restructuring, though, has inadvertently exposed the US funding long denied by local protesters and pan-democrats.

According to Time magazine, the held-up funds were to have been distributed by the Washington-based Open Technology Fund (OTF), supposedly an independent non-profit, but financed by the US Congress. One cancelled project was to set up “a cybersecurity incident response team” to provide protesters with “secure communications apps” after analysing “Chinese surveillance techniques”.

According to Time, OTF “was a key early funder of Signal, the encrypted messaging app of choice for many Hong Kong protesters. Between 2012 and 2016, it donated nearly US$3 million to the development of the encryption protocol the app is built on”.

Another suspended project was “a rapid response fund”, which “has made several payouts to groups in Hong Kong since unrest began” in June last year. “The freeze,” reported Time, “has so far prevented at least one Hong Kong-related payout from the rapid response fund.”

Libby Liu, the former CEO of OTF who resigned over the funding freeze, acknowledged the operations. “We have several projects housed in Hong Kong,” Liu told Time. “We can’t help [people in Hong Kong] get ready if we can’t be in business.”

The agency and OTF are not the only ones. The National Endowment for Democracy, another Congress-funded entity, spent US$643,000 in Hong Kong last year. In 2013, according to its own records, it was US$695,031. Those amounts seem roughly to be recurrent annual spending in the city, at least until December when Beijing imposed sanctions against it.

They are probably just the tip of the iceberg.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

localizer

Colonel
Registered Member
Just personal experience of how Western propaganda is instilled from birth like Islam.

In AP "World" history class, they didn't teach about Japanese atrocities beyond Pearl Harbor. Than Japan became friend. Then Japan was always friend. :)

Then the parents teach this to their kids.

Hongkong somehow decided it was a good idea to continue to be ignorant in their own ways.



Westerners don’t know about the Opium Wars. How can they understand the politics behind Hongkong?
 
Last edited:

Mr T

Senior Member
It is funny how you could rewrite the history by manipulating information. If I were not a HKer, I probably would fail to recognize the lies and twisted facts within your narrative.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"In his 2007 Review of Citizenship, Lord Goldsmith recognised that to give BN(O)s full British citizenship automatically would be a breach of the commitments made between China and the UK in the 1984 Joint Declaration on the future of Hong Kong, and that to secure Chinese agreement to vary the terms of that treaty would not be possible."

Feel free to post a legal opinion that said the opposite.

People in HK understood that it is unrealistic to ask UK to grant citizenship to all HKers. Hong Kong people only asked the British to grant them a way to immigrant to UK. And British has denied even this simple request.

I'm not sure what you mean. HK residents have been able to travel to the UK without a visa whether or not they had a BNO passport. If you're talking about the right to come and live in the UK without restriction, only EEA citizens had that right. If the UK had offered a similar scheme to HK residents without the same being offered to British citizens who wanted to live and work in Hong Kong (same applies in reverse, British citizens can travel to HK for 6 months but need a visa to stay longer, study or work), the government would probably have been challenged in court by other nationalities who said that the policy was racial discrimination.

Those who can leave HK and thrive in US, UK, Canada, Australia have already done so. Those who can't leave or were forced to return don't stand a chance.

I don't see why. Up until now there was hope that Hong Kong would do fine under Chinese rule and that 1C2S might even be extended (Deng said as much). Therefore normal HKers had every reason to stay. Now the situation is quite different because it's clear that the CCP wants to run Hong Kong like any other Chinese city.

This Hong Kong exodus brain drain narrative is ridiculously exaggerated. The wealthy have long been able to buy overseas residencies and citizenships through investor visas, while top students and professionals have already had access to talent schemes and work visas.

Why would well-educated HKers want to work abroad? Surely Beijing did a wonderful job ruling Hong Kong and making it a wonderful place to live.

You're not saying that Hong Kong is a scummy city where only those with low ambition live, are you? Oh dear, what did China do to the city after the handover? :D
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Why would well-educated HKers want to work abroad? Surely Beijing did a wonderful job ruling Hong Kong and making it a wonderful place to live.

You're not saying that Hong Kong is a scummy city where only those with low ambition live, are you? Oh dear, what did China do to the city after the handover? :D

That's implying that general fear, anathema and hostility to China, mainland Chinese people, and the CCP is not a sufficient motivator..
 

Figaro

Senior Member
Registered Member
Just personal experience of how Western propaganda is instilled from birth like Islam.

In AP "World" history class, they didn't teach about Japanese atrocities beyond Pearl Harbor. Than Japan became friend. Then Japan was always friend. :)

Then the parents teach this to their kids.

Hongkong somehow decided it was a good idea to continue to be ignorant in their own ways.



Westerners don’t know about the Opium Wars. How can they understand the politics behind Hongkong?
To be fair, American history curriculum and textbooks still talk about the atrocities and acts of aggression of the Japanese towards the Chinese, such as the Rape of Nanking. World history I assume is a very big class so they wouldn't cover things in too much detail.
 

Mr T

Senior Member
That's implying that general fear, anathema and hostility to China, mainland Chinese people, and the CCP is not a sufficient motivator..

Certainly there was plenty of fear in the run up to 1997, but after that most HK people seemed pleasantly surprised by how things went. Bar the 2003 protests I think the first decade went reasonably well. Even 5-10 years ago I think people were mostly willing to stick it out and had hope things would get better.
 

EtherealSmoke

New Member
Registered Member
Why would well-educated HKers want to work abroad? Surely Beijing did a wonderful job ruling Hong Kong and making it a wonderful place to live.

You're not saying that Hong Kong is a scummy city where only those with low ambition live, are you? Oh dear, what did China do to the city after the handover? :D

Oh dear, such resentment!

The well-educated elite and moneyed classes have done incredibly well in Hong Kong after the handover, thank you very much. :p I'm guessing you don't mingle in those circles?

Why would they leave now when things are calming down, and markets going back up? Things look nice and rosy from here on out.

In all honesty though, I sympathise.

However, HK's problems result from tycoon capture of governance. Case in point - the HK housing market. Lotta open land in HK, but because the market's controlled by a few tycoon firms, we’ve got no housing supply and sky-high pricing.

HK would've done better with more PRC influence, not less. Instead, 1C2S forced the CPC to rely and empower the only HK interest group they had any influence over, the tycoons, to protect Chinese interests in Hong Kong. After all, who else could the Party work with?

We all know the rest of the story from there - a tycoon-led, hypercapitalist utopia with massive elite profits against an imploding middle-class. Tragic.

However, not to fret my friend! Things are looking up now with the CPC sidelining the tycoons and asserting more direct political control with the new national security law!
 
Top