manqiangrexue
Brigadier
Ok, so you actually are so far behind me that you don't even understand the concept of a debate. Yeah, in a debate you need to address the other person's points and prove them wrong. What you just wrote is the equivalent of a boxer saying he's not gonna waste everyone time by hitting his opponent.... but somehow, in his mind, that makes him the winner LOL
Not only is that not the most important aspect, it's not any aspect of our conversation.
Which is to be timid and wait for encouragement from the people (which it already got) or to prepare a shower deprivation plan? Which one did it do? Because you had no other "wants."
That's true, and I've said many times that I would give them my undying support anyway because I have confidence in their judgement. But you fail to realize that Beijing is not doing what you want it to do either (outlined as those 2 things above), though our debate was never about if Beijing should use force; it was about if Beijing should deprive Hong Kong of shower water during a non-existent secession or if the patriots of Hong Kong had done enough to stave off city-wide blanket punishment by Beijing. Both points you could not sustain due to ignorance and stupidity.
You will always win your dad's backyard special Olympics, but never a debate with me, and that will be the essential point of your life.
Notice how a competent person like myself dissects your writing and addresses it point-by-point. This is a debate skill that you would do well to learn, but unfortunately, may never be capable of.
Last edited:
