Funny article thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
BMUFL

BMUFL

Junior Member
Registered Member
horse said:
60d33be89c10a5b2f1d5dec6-w-EUE9-Cg-YOh-BCLN7l5m-Z3-Dk-RM7-Pi4w-Vnf-Vh-E0b-RBs-Jsh-cb1g0bbi8-S2o-RDj5ssj-Dwo7cqi4-T9-P.png


The student should have gotten some part marks, like a 1 or a 2.

This is not the textbook answer, this is real world shit.
Click to expand...
I mean, it's actually the Waterfall model, just stated differently. Notice the order is actually "Denial-Bargaining-Anger-Depression-Acceptance" compared to the conventional order of "Denial-Anger-Bargaining-Depression-Acceptance".
  1. Requirement Gathering/Analysis - Denial: "Guys, guys! Don't worry about it. We can fix this. This seems simple enough. It's not a problem, guys!"
  2. System Design - Bargaining: "I have talked to the client, and they wanted it that way, exactly, to the letter. I was assured that the client had a reason for doing it that way. I'm assured of this."
  3. Implementation - Anger: "Wh- wh- what the f*ck? The f*ck is this sh*t? It doesn't even actually work! There is no way this could work. How? Just how?"
  4. Testing/Verification - Depression: "This whole thing is a buggy mess. It's a spaghetti monster. Nothing makes logical sense, and it's impossible to tell which part caused which change. Where is my bottle of Everclear?"
  5. Maintenance - Acceptance: "I'm outta here. Bonne chance, boys."
... although I suppose the conventional order could also work.
 
BlackWindMnt

BlackWindMnt

Major
Registered Member
solarz said:
  1. Denial: no, that's a stupid idea, we're not going to do it.
  2. Bargaining: okay, maybe if we build this feature, they'll be satisfied.
  3. Anger: what? more scope creep?
  4. Depression: so many bugs...
  5. Acceptance: eh, screw this, just ship it.
Click to expand...
You can do this again every sprint.....:p
 
coolgod

coolgod

Brigadier
Registered Member
1686728410549.png
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
New caption contest.
1 Year ago:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

PM Scott Morrison declined to meet new Chinese ambassador​

China’s ambassador Xiao Qian asked to meet Scott Morrison soon after arriving in Australia to deliver a message from Xi Jinping, but the Prime Minister declined to take the meeting.

I recall a few years ago there was another prominent Chinese ambassador to another country whose meeting requests were all turned down, what ever happened to that guy ;)
 
Last edited:
C

caudaceus

Senior Member
Registered Member
BMUFL said:
I mean, it's actually the Waterfall model, just stated differently. Notice the order is actually "Denial-Bargaining-Anger-Depression-Acceptance" compared to the conventional order of "Denial-Anger-Bargaining-Depression-Acceptance".
  1. Requirement Gathering/Analysis - Denial: "Guys, guys! Don't worry about it. We can fix this. This seems simple enough. It's not a problem, guys!"
  2. System Design - Bargaining: "I have talked to the client, and they wanted it that way, exactly, to the letter. I was assured that the client had a reason for doing it that way. I'm assured of this."
  3. Implementation - Anger: "Wh- wh- what the f*ck? The f*ck is this sh*t? It doesn't even actually work! There is no way this could work. How? Just how?"
  4. Testing/Verification - Depression: "This whole thing is a buggy mess. It's a spaghetti monster. Nothing makes logical sense, and it's impossible to tell which part caused which change. Where is my bottle of Everclear?"
  5. Maintenance - Acceptance: "I'm outta here. Bonne chance, boys."
... although I suppose the conventional order could also work.
Click to expand...
Based and techbropilled
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top