F-35 Joint Strike Fighter News, Videos and pics Thread

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
I think this is not a good news but the Japanese are so rich, huh?

These are aircraft the US is buying for Japan, as well as building,, we do this in active theatres of operation, Israel as well, has a package deal like that, so it enables our allies who are at risk to assume some the expense of their own defense, with a lot of help from the US..
 
Sep 11, 2017
only now noticed New F-35 program head wants lot 11 deal by October

3 days ago
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and F-35 program head blasts Lockheed for slow progress on contract
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The top F-35 program official is not satisfied with the pace of ongoing negotiations with Lockheed Martin for the 11th batch of joint strike fighters, but the government is far from having to consider imposing a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, the program head said Wednesday.


Vice Adm. Mat Winter, the program executive officer of the F-35 Joint Program Office, had initially wanted to seal a deal for more than 130 Lot 11 jets
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
— a lofty goal, considering it had taken his predecessor more than a year to get a 10th batch of jets on contract.

He missed both that target as well as his slightly more modest objective of finalizing a contract by the end of 2017.

Both Lockheed and the JPO continue to negotiate in good faith and are making progress, Winter told reporters during a roundtable Wednesday. However, he is not happy with what he sees as Lockheed’s lack of effort.

“They could be much more cooperative and more collaborative, and we could seal this deal faster. We could. They choose not to, and that’s a negotiating tactic,” he said.

Winter would not elaborate on when the JPO would consider setting a unilateral contract, calling it “an endgame tactic that is the last resort. We are nowhere near that.”

It is incredibly rare for the government to impose a unilateral contract agreement, or UCA — a one-sided deal that forces a contractor to abide by terms set by the government.

In fact, the practice was all but unheard of until the JPO forced Lockheed into a $6.1 billion contract for the ninth lot of F-35s in November 2016.

The program office felt Lot 9 negotiations had completely stagnated, and the unilateral contract was its only remaining option. Then, after President Donald Trump criticized the program and inserted himself into negotiations, Lockheed cut its losses and decided not to pursue legal action against the Defense Department for the UCA. Trump’s influence arguably helped accelerate a deal for Lot 10 jets toward the finish line, though the program office had already put in more than a year’s work at the negotiating table.

Historically, two of the major difficulties that has slowed down F-35 negotiations is figuring out how much each F-35 should cost, as well as the fee paid to Lockheed.

In the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, an “A” model dropped in cost from more than $100 million to $94.6 million. That sum includes the price of the air vehicle, engine and Lockheed’s fee, Winter explained. The price per unit of an F-35 dropped, on average, by 7.5 percent — just a little ahead of the JPO’s goal of a 6-7 percent reduction.

Winter said Wednesday he expects all variants of the F-35 to be cheaper in Lot 11 than in the previous batch. However, he would not put forward a similar cost goal for Lot 11, arguing that it could diminish his chances of having an advantageous starting point for future batches.

“If I give you a number and it gets printed, Lockheed Martin has a target. I’m negotiating for the best deal,” he said.

Perhaps surprisingly, Lockheed officials have acknowledged the difficulties in working through a deal for Lot 11. During the Singapore Airshow earlier this month, Orlando Carvalho, the company’s head of its aeronautics business, said he hopes to settle a contract “in the near future” but couldn’t give a time frame for when he expected to reach an agreement with the JPO.

“Because of the quantity of planes, the value of what we’re discussing, given the size and everything like that, it does take time. So we’re in that process,” he said. “We still have a bit of work ahead of us.”

Carvalho acknowledged a unilateral contract could be an option if negotiations fall apart, but said he also recognized “with high confidence that it is not their desire to do that.”

Since contract negotiations seem to be dragging on, isn’t it time for the president to get involved, as he did on the 10th lot of F-35s?

Winter, who was asked that question, seemed to think that was unnecessary. The program office has its best negotiator sitting down at the table with Lockheed, and she’s doing “phenomenal work,” he said.

“She’s in the NAVAIR 2.0 contracting competency. First name’s Julie. She’s great,” he said. “She will stare down anybody. More importantly, she comes prepared with facts.”
 

timepass

Brigadier
Turkey to receive first delivery of F-35 fighter jets within 12 months. The new generation of the F-35 combat jet’s vertical-takeoff capabilities will be compatible with Turkey’s amphibious multi-purpose combat frigate Anadolu TCG, currently in development.

28279975_10156141505889919_9186258770485127419_n.jpg
 
inside
US military targets F-35 labour costs, repairs for savings
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

:

"Only about 20 flight test points remain to complete testing of Block 3F software, marking the end of an 11-year flight test campaign during the system development and demonstration phase, Winter says."
 
according to AirForceMag Program Office Warns F-35 Sustainment Unaffordable Without Cost Reductions
3/1/2018
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Acknowledging that the F-35’s sustainment cost is too high, Joint Program Executive Vice Adm. Mat Winter said Wednesday his organization is taking immediate steps to get the program on a more affordable vector, although he didn’t forecast how quickly these efforts might pay off.

The JPO is conducting a “deep dive” to better understand Lockheed Martin’s production costs in order to find savings on touch labor, he said.

If current sustainment costs remain unchanged “into the future, as our fleet grows from the 280 aircraft [today] to the 800-plus that we’ll have by the end of 2021, we will be unaffordable, in that the services’ budgets will not be able to sustain that,” Winter told reporters at a press conference in Arlington, Va.

Winter said he expects the F-35 to enter full-up Initial Operational Test and Evaluation in September—some four months later than the JPO’s last estimate—and wrap up in May 2019. “Pre-IOT&E” events were undertaken with the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation’s blessing: cold-weather testing at Eielson AFB, Alaska, and evaluation for close air support along with other ground-support missions. These tests are set to get underway in March or April.

The bad sustainment actors in the F-35 fleets are in the early production lot aircraft, Winter explained. Lot 2 through 4 aircraft are available about 40-50 percent of the time, he said, while later jets from Lots 9 and 10 are turning in availability rates of 70-75 percent. The overall fleet average is about 51 percent. It makes sense that the earlier jets performing more poorly because they were built from an immature design and now have “seven to eight years of wear and tear,” he said. With the benefit of operational experience and revised design, later jets are better-functioning and more easily sustained, he said, and spare parts production is more robust.

Two things are being done now to get availability rates up. First, Winter said, the services are organically “increasing repair capacity” for spare parts because they have stood up their own depots. This frees up vendors to concentrate on making parts for production and spares on newer aircraft. The depots are taking over repairs on tires and wheels, avionics, canopies, etc., leaving vendors more breathing room for manufacture of new items rather than replacements.

“Fiscal Year '18 is the transition year to start that up,” Winter said.

Second, a push is on to get better performance from test equipment to reduce false positives, he said. Too often, parts are being pulled and sent for repair because the local test gear says they’ve gone bad, but in fact, there’s nothing wrong with them, and they get “RTO’d,” he said, meaning “Return - Test Okay.” The newest version of the Autonomic Logistics Information System should cut down on false positives, Winter said.

“So, we are putting all these initiatives in place, we are reviewing that data back to the services so they can make good, informed decisions about the path forward on sustainability, production and capabilities,” he added.

As to the overall price of the F-35, Winter said “I am not satisfied that the cost is coming down fast enough,” and so the JPO is doing a “deep dive,” in partnership with Lockheed Martin, to assess why touch labor costs aren’t going down more rapidly. They are looking “everything from bathroom breaks to how long the paperwork takes” to scrap, repair and rework events to see where there may be bottlenecks. This is also being done with the top 100 suppliers, he said, toward obtaining a fine “granularity” of cost understanding. This in turn will be applied to negotiating the Lot 11 contract, which Winter expects will yield yet another unit cost price drop. Negotiations on Lot 11 started about 18 months ago, and although Winter previously said he hoped for a signed deal by the end of 2017, it has taken a while for the new Pentagon leadership to get fully up to speed on the program, he noted.

Lockheed Martin “could be more cooperative” on the negotiations, he said. “They could be more collaborative … they choose not to. It’s a negotiating tactic.” It’s far too early to think about imposing a “unilateral” deal, as happened on Lot 10, Winter said. That was and is “a last resort,” he added.

Asked if President Trump should “get involved” in the F-35 negotiations, Winter said the civilian Pentagon leadership is kept fully updated on progress, and “how they choose to use that information is at their discretion.”
 
now F-35 Price Dropping But Not Enough for the Pentagon
The F-35 Lighting II Joint Strike Fighter production is ramping-up, but the Pentagon’s official in charge of the program warns the current $94 million to $120 million cost per jet is still too high and could become unaffordable if more savings can’t be squeezed out of the manufacturing process.

Speaking with reporters Wednesday, Vice Adm. Mat Winter, the Pentagon director of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program, detailed where production now stands and provided a sketch of where he’d like production to be in the near future.

Winter’s team is in the midst of negotiations with lead F-35 contractor Lockheed Martin to set a price for the next group of F-35 jets – Lot 11 – the Pentagon will buy.

Lockheed Martin submitted its Lot 11 proposal about a year and a half ago, but Winter said the first offer from Lockheed Martin didn’t arrive at the Pentagon until more recently. Winter conceded he had hoped to have the deal finalized by the end of 2017.

The negotiation might be dragging on, but Winter both his team and Lockheed Martin are negotiating in good faith.

“I will tell you I am not as satisfied with the collaboration and the cooperation by Lockheed Martin,” Winter said.
“They could be much more cooperative and collaborative. We could seal this deal faster. We could. They choose not to, and that’s a negotiating tactic.”

More importantly, Winter stressed the prolonged negotiation is not delaying Lot 11 production. The component parts are purchased a year before the first aircraft is built, so work on Lot 11 has already started.

Winter wouldn’t share the Pentagon’s target price for Lot 11, only saying it will be lower than what was paid for Lot 10. At the same time, Lot 11 will mark an increase in production, with 130 aircraft due for delivery. In comparison, when completed by the end of 2018, Lot 10 will have delivered 105 aircraft. Lot 9 had a delivery of 66 aircraft.

“We are on the ramp,” Winter said.

Marillyn Hewson, chief executive of Lockheed Martin, touted the increasing F-35 production during a Jan. 29 conference call with Wall Street analysts,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
from investor analysis site Seeking Alpha. Hewson said Lockheed Martin expects, “To deliver approximately 90 jets this year, an increase of over 35 percent from 2017 as we continue to progress to full rate production in the next few years.”

Lockheed Martin officials predict a production rate of 150 aircraft per year will be achieved within the next couple of years.

However, even with production increasing and the price-per-aircraft is decreasing, Winter expressed alarm the price isn’t dropping enough. Next week Winter is scheduled to appear before the House Armed Services Committee, and it is likely the program’s cost will be a topic of discussion.

Through Lot 10, the vast majority of production has been focused on building the mature designed F-35A – the Air Force variant – with an average cost of $94.3 million per jet, according to Lockheed Martin. The Marine Corps vertical lift F-35B variant and the Navy’s arrested landing F-35C variant both had a cost of more than $120 million per jet in Lot 10.

Winter has a team investigating 100 suppliers in the F-35 supply chain to identify places where production can be improved, reducing the problem of parts that aren’t manufactured correctly or where the production line can be more streamlined.

“The price is coming down but it’s not coming down fast enough,” Winter said. “We don’t know to the level of granularity that I want to know, what it actually costs to produce this aircraft.”
it's USNI News
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Jan 25, 2017
Jan 16, 2017
and A-10 vs. F-35 Flyoff May Begin Next Year: General
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
now an update:
A-10 Vs. F-35 Showdown Still Coming -- And Could Happen This Spring
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

As the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
program barrels toward its final major testing process before full-rate production, program leaders say a much-discussed comparison test between the beloved
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and the new 5th-generation fighter is very much still in planning, and could kick off as soon as next month.

In a roundtable discussion with reporters at the F-35 Joint Program Office headquarters near Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, the director of the program said the final test and evaluation plan is still being constructed. That will determine, he said, when the A-10 vs. F-35 test begins, and whether it happens in the main test effort or in an earlier, more focused evaluation.

"The Congress has directed the [Defense Department] to do comparison testing, we call it," Vice Adm. Mat Winter said. "I wouldn't call it a flyoff; it's a comparison testing of the A-10 and the F-35. And given that the department was given that task ... that is in [the] operational test and evaluation plan."

Initial Operational Test and Evaluation, or IOT&E, is set to begin for the F-35 in September. But two new increments of preliminary testing were recently added to the calendar to evaluate specific capabilities, Winter said.

The first increment, which was completed in January and February, took place at
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in Alaska and evaluated the ability of the aircraft to perform in extreme cold weather conditions, with a focus on the effectiveness of alert launches. The results of those tests have yet to be made public.

The second increment, set to begin in April, will focus on close-air support capabilities, reconnaissances, and limited examination of weapons delivery, Winter said. The testing is expected to take place at
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in California and other ranges in the western United States.

Questions surrounding the F-35's ability to perform in a close-air support role are what prompted initial interest in a comparison between the aging A-10 "Warthog" and the cutting-edge fighter in the first place.

The requirement that the two aircraft go up against each other was included as a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
amid congressional concerns over plans to retire the A-10 and replace it with the F-35.

In an interview with Military.com in 2017,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Brig. Gen. Scott Pleus, then-director of the F-35 program's integration office, said he expected the A-10 to emerge as a better CAS platform in a no-threat environment.

But the dynamics would change, he said, as the threat level increased.

"As you now start to build the threat up, the A-10s won't even enter the airspace before they get shot down -- not even within 20 miles of the target."
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
Jan 25, 2017
now an update:
A-10 Vs. F-35 Showdown Still Coming -- And Could Happen This Spring
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This will be an "EYE OPENER" for you unbelievers! or a heartbreak for those who have "KEPT THE FAITH!" LOL

anyway, for you to maintain any credibility as a credible witness, I'm challenging you to post as many adversarial posts on the J-20 and SU-57,,, otherwise I'm gonna think you're a butt kisser??

one to one, post as much "bad krap" as you can find on the F-35,,, just match it one for one on the J-20 and SU-57 threads, and yes its out there, NO WEASELING!
 
This will be an "EYE OPENER" for you unbelievers! or a heartbreak for those who have "KEPT THE FAITH!" LOL

anyway, for you to maintain any credibility as a credible witness, I'm challenging you to post as many adversarial posts on the J-20 and SU-57,,, otherwise I'm gonna think you're a butt kisser??

one to one, post as much "bad krap" as you can find on the F-35,,, just match it one for one on the J-20 and SU-57 threads, and yes its out there, NO WEASELING!
I beg your pardon, thought you knew I post stuff as it comes and goes, just check
Dec 21, 2017
and now F-35 Ascending: The Pentagon's Biggest Program Had Its Best Year Ever In 2017
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
LOL! not exactly my fault when now the officer, in rank of Vice Admiral, in charge of the F-35 Program Office doesn't like the pricing, making the USNI News Yesterday at 8:56 PM

OK I'll go attach Like to your post anyway LOL
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
I beg your pardon, thought you knew I post stuff as it comes and goes, just check
Dec 21, 2017

LOL! not exactly my fault when now the officer, in rank of Vice Admiral, in charge of the F-35 Program Office doesn't like the pricing, making the USNI News Yesterday at 8:56 PM

OK I'll go attach Like to your post anyway LOL

Sure!, it's just a man to man challenge,, hang everybody's dirty laundry to "air out",,, not just our poor little "Baby Raptor", LOL

by the way, Happy Casimir Pulaski day, we celebrate his B'day in Central Obamastan, known as the father of the American Calvary! even though I'm rather lacking as a "horse soldier" myself,, although for a time aeroplanes where calvary mounts??
 
Top